The Qur’an says “When you meet the unbelievers, strike the necks” (47:4).
But of course it would be “Islamophobic” to notice that.
“UK: Afghan Sex Offender Gets Short Sentence for Trying to Cut Teen’s Throat on Public Bus,” by Jack Montgomery, Breitbart, July 16, 2022:
An Afghan migrant still in Britain despite being convicted of 23 offences including a sexual assault has received a short sentence for trying to slaughter a teen boy like an animal on the floor of a public bus in Runcorn, England.
Hamid Akhonzada, who arrived in Britain supposedly aged 16 claiming to be a refugee from Afghanistan’s Western-backed government ten years ago, evidently faced no significant punishments for his many crimes, given he was a free man last March when the attack took place.
Chester Crown Court heard that Akhonzada, who claimed he was “close to God” heard voices, “held [his 17 year-old victim’s] head back and drew a bladed article described as a steak knife across the throat”, as one might slaughter an animal, after sitting behind him and his girlfriend, 16, on a public bus.
Despite this shocking testimony, recounted in a Liverpool Echo court report, and CCTV of the attack, prosecutors did not charge him for attempted murder — the victim’s throat was not fully opened, although he required glue and stitches to stem the bleeding and his girlfriend was also injured — but accepted a guilty plea to the relatively minor crimes of Section 18 wounding with intent and having a bladed article in public.
He was also convicted of assaulting an emergency worker, having beaten a prison guard so brutally that he was left unconscious for minutes some time after being taken into custody.
For this, the career violent criminal and sex offender was handed a mere four years plus four years on an extended licence after his release by Judge Michael Leeming, despite a lot of tough talk about how his “record for violence and sexual assault [was] a statutory aggravating factor”….
Keith O says
Of course, we are left to wonder what the sentence would have been for a Brit who committed the same string of offenses? I would almost guarantee that he would have been charged with attempted murder and if it had been a mudslime who was the victim of the attack, then the charge of a hate crime would also have been added and he wouldn’t see the light of day for decades.
mortimer says
UK’s new TWO-TIER justice system … Muslims get reduced sentencing for hair-raising crimes!
However, anyone who criticizes Islam gets jailed in maximum security where Muslim terrorists torture them by pouring boiling water on the British blasphemers who are then put into isolation for weeks for the ‘crime’ of being attacked by the Muslim terrorists in prison.
Michael says
How is Tommy Robinson treated inside?
Hoi Polloi says
Exactly. His treatment at their hands exposes their lies and agenda. Further, I read an article on this case in UK media and they described the result of the attack as having left the victim with SCRATCHES on his throat.
CogitoErgoSum says
Only in Islam can a person get “close to God” by cutting someone’s throat. How could that not be attempted murder? Did the court think he was under the illusion that he was at a restaurant slicing into a steak? This man should be sent back to Afghanistan without delay following four years of hard labor cleaning out sewers. He should be living in an environment more suitable to his upbringing and character.
mortimer says
Sharia law provides no punishment for a Muslim who kills a kafir who has not even provoked him.
A popular Sharia law manual called ‘The Hedaya’ says:
-“The destruction of the SWORD is incurred by infidels, although they be not the first aggressors, as appears from various passages in the sacred writings which are generally received to this effect. (Margin note) Infidels may be attacked without provocation.
“If a Mussulman attack infidels without previously calling them to the faith, he is an offender, because this forbidden: but yet, if he do attack them before thus inviting them, and slay them, and take their property, NEITHER fine, expiation, or atonement ARE DUE, because that which protects (the infidel)(namely, ISLAM) does not exist in them, nor are they under protection by PLACE, (namely, the Mussulman territory) and the mere PROHIBITION of the act is not sufficient to sanction the exaction either of fine, or of atonement for property: in the same mannas the slaying of the women or infant children of infidels is forbidden: but if, notwithstanding, a person were to slay such, he is not liable to a fine.” -from The Hedaya (manual of Sharia)
…………………………………
According to Sharia law, the Muslim receives no punishment for murdering a kafir … even though there was no offense by the kafir. Sharia just says, in effect, ‘it was regrettable’ … don’t do it again.
In this case, the attack took place in the ‘Region of War’ (Dar al Harb), so the Muslim has even less responsibility for killing a kafir who deserves death because of the kafir’s unbelief.
Thus Sharia law is inherently and systemically promoting bigotry.
somehistory says
Put him to work feeding hogs and he can hear the oink, oink for real and not the pretend ‘voices.’
‘heard voices”… that part was to try to convince the judge that he was a mental case and needed therapy.
tough talk doesn’t undo the damage done to the throat nor the damage done to the emotions…probably every time the teen and his girl ride a bus.
Have him do four years of slopping hogs, and then send him back to the taliban with a note about what he has been ‘ up to.’
Donovan Nuera says
The prosecutor is an idiot; does he think that slicing a person throat is NOT associated with a high mortality rate? It’s not like slicing a shoulder or back or buttock or forefoot. If you don’t die of rapid and painful exsanguination and aspiration of blood into one’s windpipe, damage to a carotid artery can lead to a massive hemispheric ischemic stroke from the lack of blood flow that would have to happen when paramedics put pressure on the wound leaving the victim hemiplegic, and if it involved the dominant language hemisphere, the loss of speech. And if the ischemic brain tissue was of large volume, the edema over the next few days would require a hemicraniectomy to allow the brain to swell outside the skull before replacing the skull weeks to months later. Similarly, if the carotid is nicked, a dissection can form and lead to the same above stroke injuries. Or an air embolism in the brain. For a refresher, the prosecutor can watch any ISIS exection video. Or the NHL hockey games when Richard Zednik (2008) and Clint Malarchuk (2007) got their throats slashed by skates and almost died on the ice. Pools of blood! For islam, throat slashing is an ecstatic sacrament of evil. See how eager they are during Eid Adha. Pure bloodlust.
mortimer says
I agree with Donovan Nuera that Islamic slaughter rituals are a training for slaughtering humans. However, I disagree that the prosecutor was ‘an idiot’. They obviously made a plea bargain, the details of which are confidential.
This man obviously hates British people because they are kafirs, but hate crimes from Muslims are almost never called that.
The prosecutors may not realize that Islam requires Muslims to hate kafirs and be hostile to them ‘for the sake of Allah’. If they did, violent crimes from Muslims would require a deprogramming part in the sentencing.
gravenimage says
True, Donovan. This was clearly a deliberate attempt to murder this young man. This wasn’t just a knife fight.
Fitna says
More examples of cowardice and weakness by the UK state. The more brutal the attacks the lighter the sentences, it’s disgusting to watch a nation implode and refusing to fight back against a deadly enemy.
It just sends the msg to Islamofascists that your cause is just and the infidels will not oppose you, so they’ll just get more aggressive and violent in the future.
They’re laying the groundwork for civil war. If people don’t believe the state is on their side, they’ll start their own form of vigilante justice. What’s worse is they’ve banned guns, which means the state is even more responsible to protect citizens as they have no means for self-defense.
This is what you get with retarded Liberal utopian fantasist thinking. The US will never be conquered by Islam, because Americans have guns and are not afraid to kill invaders to defend their freedom. This is what the rest of the free world lacks. All western nations should adopt US policy, esp. 1A and 2A.
gravenimage says
UK: Afghan Muslim migrant convicted of 23 offenses gets just 4 years for trying to cut teen’s throat on public bus
……………………………….
*Of course* this was attempted murder. And this thug is also a sex offender and in this latest crime also assaulted an emergency worker and beat a prison guard unconscious. And generally prison guards know how to handle violent perps, so he should be regarded as especially dangerous.
And he has been convicted of *23* offences in the ten years he has been in the UK–these are just the convictions, and those are just the ones he has been caught for.
And why would he need asylum from “Afghanistan’s Western-backed government” in the first place? This was generally amazingly corrupt, but not much of a direct threat to its citizens.
Will this violent Muslim *finally* be deported after serving his pathetically short term? I wouldn’t count on it…
mortimer says
It isn’t a ‘HATE CRIME’ when a Muslim fanatic does it.
However, hating the kafir ‘for the sake of Allah’ is required by Sharia law.
-Imam Abdul-Latif ibn Abdur-Rahman Rahimullah said, “It is not possible for someone to realize Tawheed (Islamic faith) and act upon it, and yet not be HOSTILE against the mushrikeen (i.e. wrong worshippers). So anyone who isn’t HOSTILE against the mushrikeen, then it cannot be said that he acts upon Tawheed nor that he realizes it.” [ad-Durar as-Saniyyah 8/167]
– “The Muslim should regard the Kuffaar as ENEMIES and HATE them because of their kufr (wrong belief), just as he HATES their kufr (wrong belief) itself.” – from Umar Sulayman ‘Abd-Allaah al-Ashqar, “Belief in Allah”
-“The doctrine of al Walaa wal Baraa is the REAL IMAGE for the actual practice of this faith.” – source “Al Walaa wal Baraa According to the Aqeedah of the Salaf”, by Sheikh Muhammad Saeed al Qatani, authoritative Saudi Sharia lawyer and imam at the Abu Bakr and Al Furqan Mosques in Mecca.
-Sheikh Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab said: (The profession of …) “Islam of a man can never be accepted, even if he abandons polytheism, unless he shows ENMITY towards the disbelievers and polytheists, as Allah says in Surat al-Muja’dila 58:02”
– “Killing a Kafir who is fighting you is OK. Killing a Kafir for any reason (e.g. criticism of Islam), you can say, it is OK – even if there is NO REASON for it. You can poison, AMBUSH and kill non-believers. You must have a stand with your heart, with your tongue, with your money, with your hand, with your sword, with your Kalashnikov. Don’t ask shall I do this, just do it.”Abu Hamza al-Masri (Egyptian born British Cleric)
gravenimage says
+1
Andrew Blackadder says
If a non muslim, pick a religion, that was to do something like this to a muslim on a Bus, on the street or wherever, I can be 100% sure that the attacker would get much more than a few years in prison and then placed among other savage muslims who would try and kill him.
My birth land of the UK is now dead and almost buried.
Glad I dont live there since 1970.