The establishment media a few years ago made a full-court press to convince Americans that “Allahu akbar” was a benign phrase that only greasy Islamophobes could possibly be concerned about.
In the New York Daily News, Zainab Chaudry of the Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) argued that non-Muslims shouldn’t “believe the worst” about “Allahu akbar” because Muslims don’t just scream it while murdering non-Muslims, but use it in a variety of contexts. She even offered this chilling advice, certain to get people killed were it ever heeded: “So the next time you hear Allahu Akbar — whether it’s in a media report, on an airplane, or in a shopping mall, remember that the phrase used by millions of Muslims and Christians daily to praise God regardless of their circumstances, can never be justified for use when harming His creation.” So stay put, evidently; fleeing would be “Islamophobic.”
On CNN, Omar Suleiman — the imam who prevailed upon Google to alter their search results so as to bury any negative information about Islam — also argued that Muslims say “Allahu akbar” in a variety of contexts, many of them positive. And the New York Times actually tweeted that the phrase “Allahu akbar” had “somehow” become “intertwined with terrorism.”
Somehow! How could this have possibly happened? Could it have anything to do with the thousands of Muslims who have screamed “Allahu akbar” while in the process of murdering or trying to murder infidels?
An update on this story. “ISIS claims responsibility for fatal attack on J&K ASI, releases video,” by Nidhi Sinha, Inshorts, July 14, 2022 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):
The Islamic State has claimed responsibility for the attack in Jammu and Kashmir’s Srinagar on Tuesday which left Assistant Sub-Inspector (ASI) Mushtaq Ahmad dead. Amaq, the propaganda group of ISIS, has released a 40-second purported body camera footage where an attacker is seen carrying a pistol and opening fire at policemen while raising slogans such as “Allah-o-Akbar” and “Lailaha-illallah”.
Infidel says
India did one thing incomplete while repealing Article 370 of their constitution: they should have also separated Jammu and Panun Kashmir from Muslim Kashmir, and then laid out various policies and proposals for those union territories/states. They ought to revisit that so that Hindus in the state are safe
Once this is done, then Kashmiri jihadists will have their work cut out for them