What Nupur Sharma said was accurate. Hadiths that Muslims consider authentic record that Muhammad’s favorite wife, Aisha, was six when Muhammad wedded her and nine when he consummated the marriage:
“The Prophet wrote the (marriage contract) with Aisha while she was six years old and consummated his marriage with her while she was nine years old and she remained with him for nine years (i.e. till his death)” (Bukhari 7.62.88).
Another tradition has Aisha herself recount the scene:
The Prophet engaged me when I was a girl of six (years). We went to Medina and stayed at the home of Bani-al-Harith bin Khazraj. Then I got ill and my hair fell down. Later on my hair grew (again) and my mother, Um Ruman, came to me while I was playing in a swing with some of my girl friends. She called me, and I went to her, not knowing what she wanted to do to me. She caught me by the hand and made me stand at the door of the house. I was breathless then, and when my breathing became all right, she took some water and rubbed my face and head with it. Then she took me into the house. There in the house I saw some Ansari women who said, “Best wishes and Allah’s Blessing and a good luck.” Then she entrusted me to them and they prepared me (for the marriage). Unexpectedly Allah’s Apostle came to me in the forenoon and my mother handed me over to him, and at that time I was a girl of nine years of age. (Bukhari 5.58.234).
Muhammad was at this time fifty-four years old.
So what is all the rioting about? It is about making non-Muslims afraid to say anything remotely critical about Islam. If Nupur Sharma had applauded and justified Muhammad’s marriage to Aisha, none of this would be happening. But she disapproved, and here we are. The idea is to force us all to accept Sharia blasphemy laws forbidding any criticism of Islam, Muhammad, or the Qur’an.
“Remarks against the Prophet: 2 killed in Ranchi as protests erupt across country,” Express News Service, June 11, 2022 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):
At least two persons died of a bullet injuries in Jharkhand’s Ranchi, where the police fired in the air to disperse a crowd pelting stones, as protests erupted in several towns and cities across the country on Friday against derogatory references to the Prophet made by former BJP spokespersons Nupur Sharma and Naveen Kumar Jindal.
The protests also turned violent in UP’s Prayagraj and West Bengal’s Howrah. The protests in Delhi and parts of Madhya Pradesh, Telangana, Gujarat, Bihar and Maharashtra were peaceful even as a shutdown was observed in Srinagar.
Internet services were suspended till 6 am on Saturday in Ranchi and 6 am on Monday in Howrah.
In Delhi, the Shahi Imam distanced himself from the protest and called for reconciliation. The All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB), meanwhile, appealed to Islamic scholars and intellectuals to not participate in “those television debates in which the sole intention is to…insult Islam and Muslims”. Sharma’s comments were madeduring [sic] a TV debate.
The protests came days after the remarks of Sharma and Jindal were criticised by over a dozen countries, including the Gulf nations, with India responding that they “do not reflect the views of the Government”. Sharma has since been suspended and Jindal expelled from the BJP.
In Ranchi, the police fired in the air to disperse a gathering that pelted stones, injuring Ranchi SSP Surendra Jha, another officer, and a policeman. Jha suffered a concussion after a stone hit the helmet he was wearing. The district administration later imposed prohibitory orders in the Main Road area.
Speaking to The Indian Express, SP Ranchi (Rural) Naushad Alam said: “Two of the protesters died. The others, who have been admitted to the Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, have injuries caused due to stone-pelting as well as pellets.”…
Black Sabbath says
Mozelms are angry because the Hindus won’t accept and respect their pedophile prophet. They have openly declared war against India. Until now, their war was clocked under a mantle of secularism. Mozzies are hoping to weaken India’s internal security through Qatar’s terror funding, to the point hat China can invade from north and take significant territories. Islam needs to be banned globally. It has zero contribution to society and it is a massive liability.
Joh says
Yep,The Shahada and the Name of Prophet Mohamed (Ibn Abi Kabsha).
The Shahadah is not in the Quran. No Muslim can find it. It is not there. It was written in AD 691-692AD, at the same time the Al Aqsa mosque was built. The Shahadah, testimony, is one of the pillars of Islam. Yes it is a pillar. It is used when praying five times a day and in conversion to Islam.
The first time the Shahadah was revealed ,was on the coins of Damascus. Abdul Al’Malik, the Caliph and Governor of Damascus, removed the bust of Caesar, from the coins.and replaced it with the Shahadah.
The final time the Shahadah was revealed, was in the Al Aqsa mosque. This was the moment Abdul Al’Malik moved to unite the Arab tribes. The Arabs, conquered the Levant but still operated as individual tribes. Some were pagans and others followers of Abrahim and Zoroastrian. This is important. They were not Muslim. The Arabs who invaded Spain were not Arab or Muslim but known as Moors from Morocco.
The oath or testimony, important, proving their loyalty to the Caliph as a united force, was the Shahadah. The name of Mohamed at this stage, was unknown. Abdul Al’ Malik, united the tribes by calling them Muslim. This is important. Their new religion Islam. Mohamed’s name was not in the Al Aqsa mosque. The “Praised One” was the name used. Why….??
Abdul Malik needed a holy book. He gathered the Qurans (recitations) or aghruf (seven dialects,given to Mohamed from the “angel”), from all the tribes and combined it into what we now know as the Quran. This explains why the Quran is so hard to read and not in chronological order. There were many Aghruf (dialects) and Readers or Isnaad (very complicated). The Aghruf was from all the tribes who conquered the Levant. Scholars can not define the Aghruf.
He then needed a prophet. There was a Warlord/King in Arabia with the credentials. This explains why Mohameds’ name is only listed four times in the Quran, 3:144, 33:40, 47:2, 48:29. The name Mecca only once. Why??? The Praised One”, according to Al’Bukhari Volume 1, Book 1, Number 6 :
Mohamed, was the King of Bani Al Asfar, who’s name was Ibn Abi Kabsha. Muslims do not know this.
Quote,“The narrative has holes”, unquote.
The fables of this King became the Prophet of Islam and is still growing in the 21st Century.
Most tribes never knew this prophet, The Quran refers to the “unknown” prophet as the,”messenger of Allah”, but they accepted him and his deeds. They called him “Mohamed”, only after the Al Aqsa mosque was completed. The “Praised One” was no longer used. There are debates whether the “Praised One” was a reference to Jesus. The noun Mohamed, was now the identity of Islam. The Quran uses “The messenger of Allah” not “Mohamed” because each tribe had their own deity. There were 360 idols around the Kaa’bah. This explains the different Aghruf. This also explains why the name of “Mohamed” is not in the Al Aqsa mosque. Why don’t Muslims ask these questions.
Today scholars argue and debate the Aghruf. Yassir Qadhi and Shabir Alley admits this. There are many Qurans or Aghruf. The most popular Hafs AD796, Warsh AD812 and Al Durie AD860. These were all written, 180 years after the death of “Mohamed” of the “traditions”. . These are very different in theology and written by men who never knew or met “Mohamed” (Ibn Abi Kabsha).. They depict the different tribal beliefs when Abdul Malik united them .
The Quran of Uthman, is nowhere to be found. He wrote nine and sent it into the Levant. Scholars can’t agree as to what happened to the Uthmanic Qurans. Why…??
Al Bughari died in AD870. Mohamed died in AD632. Shahadah 692. These do not line up historically. The traditions have them all in the same time of “Mohamed”.
The formula was complete, They had a religion, holy book and prophet. They were united as Muslims, the new religion., to defeat the Byzintine, Roman Catholic Empire. Not Christains. Abdul Malik achieved the wishes of Marwan his father who laid the groundwork for this.
Bikinis not Burkas says
Can they handle this TRUTH from their own sacred texts?
The perfect man, NOT, defective DNA.
Muhammad was WHITE!
http://quranx.com/Hadith/Muslim/Reference/Hadith-2340/
Muhammad was a dwarf and fat!
http://sunnah.com/abudawud/42/154
Infidel says
The riots in Bengal are a tad funny, given that Mumtaz Banerjee, who had supported muslims in rioting against Hindus over the last 2 years, now expects them to stop and protest only in Delhi, but not in her state. In response, the muslims reminded her how she is in power due to the charity of muslims, and that humiliation is too funny to watch
https://www.opindia.com/2022/06/an-islamic-cleric-reminded-mamata-banerjee-that-muslims-made-her-cm
Joh says
Muhammad wrote Nothing,The Shahada and the Name of Prophet Mohamed (Ibn Abi Kabsha).
The Shahadah is not in the Quran. No Muslim can find it. It is not there. It was written in AD 691-692AD, at the same time the Al Aqsa mosque was built. The Shahadah, testimony, is one of the pillars of Islam. Yes it is a pillar. It is used when praying five times a day and in conversion to Islam.
The first time the Shahadah was revealed ,was on the coins of Damascus. Abdul Al’Malik, the Caliph and Governor of Damascus, removed the bust of Caesar, from the coins.and replaced it with the Shahadah.
The final time the Shahadah was revealed, was in the Al Aqsa mosque. This was the moment Abdul Al’Malik moved to unite the Arab tribes. The Arabs, conquered the Levant but still operated as individual tribes. Some were pagans and others followers of Abrahim and Zoroastrian. This is important. They were not Muslim. The Arabs who invaded Spain were not Arab or Muslim but known as Moors from Morocco.
The oath or testimony, important, proving their loyalty to the Caliph as a united force, was the Shahadah. The name of Mohamed at this stage, was unknown. Abdul Al’ Malik, united the tribes by calling them Muslim. This is important. Their new religion Islam. Mohamed’s name was not in the Al Aqsa mosque. The “Praised One” was the name used. Why….??
Abdul Malik needed a holy book. He gathered the Qurans (recitations) or aghruf (seven dialects,given to Mohamed from the “angel”), from all the tribes and combined it into what we now know as the Quran. This explains why the Quran is so hard to read and not in chronological order. There were many Aghruf (dialects) and Readers or Isnaad (very complicated). The Aghruf was from all the tribes who conquered the Levant. Scholars can not define the Aghruf.
He then needed a prophet. There was a Warlord/King in Arabia with the credentials. This explains why Mohameds’ name is only listed four times in the Quran, 3:144, 33:40, 47:2, 48:29. The name Mecca only once. Why??? The Praised One”, according to Al’Bukhari Volume 1, Book 1, Number 6 :
Mohamed, was the King of Bani Al Asfar, who’s name was Ibn Abi Kabsha. Muslims do not know this.
Quote,“The narrative has holes”, unquote.
The fables of this King became the Prophet of Islam and is still growing in the 21st Century.
Most tribes never knew this prophet, The Quran refers to the “unknown” prophet as the,”messenger of Allah”, but they accepted him and his deeds. They called him “Mohamed”, only after the Al Aqsa mosque was completed. The “Praised One” was no longer used. There are debates whether the “Praised One” was a reference to Jesus. The noun Mohamed, was now the identity of Islam. The Quran uses “The messenger of Allah” not “Mohamed” because each tribe had their own deity. There were 360 idols around the Kaa’bah. This explains the different Aghruf. This also explains why the name of “Mohamed” is not in the Al Aqsa mosque. Why don’t Muslims ask these questions.
Today scholars argue and debate the Aghruf. Yassir Qadhi and Shabir Alley admits this. There are many Qurans or Aghruf. The most popular Hafs AD796, Warsh AD812 and Al Durie AD860. These were all written, 180 years after the death of “Mohamed” of the “traditions”. . These are very different in theology and written by men who never knew or met “Mohamed” (Ibn Abi Kabsha).. They depict the different tribal beliefs when Abdul Malik united them .
The Quran of Uthman, is nowhere to be found. He wrote nine and sent it into the Levant. Scholars can’t agree as to what happened to the Uthmanic Qurans. Why…??
Al Bughari died in AD870. Mohamed died in AD632. Shahadah 692. These do not line up historically. The traditions have them all in the same time of “Mohamed”.
The formula was complete, They had a religion, holy book and prophet. They were united as Muslims, the new religion., to defeat the Byzintine, Roman Catholic Empire. Not Christains. Abdul Malik achieved the wishes of Marwan his father who laid the groundwork for this.
john smith says
Thank you for this excellent and very informative post.
Larry Culp says
I thank you for the well, written information