“Indeed, those who malign Allah and his messenger, Allah has cursed them in this world and the hereafter, and has prepared for them a humiliating punishment. And those who malign believing men and believing women undeservedly, they bear the guilt of slander and obvious sin. O prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to draw their veils close around them. That will be better, so that they may be recognized and not molested. Allah is always forgiving, merciful. If the hypocrites and those in whose hearts is a disease and the alarmists in the city do not stop, we will indeed urge you on against them, then they will be your neighbors in it only for a little while. Cursed, they will be seized wherever they are found and killed with a slaughter.” (Qur’an 33:57-61)
Abu ‘Afak was a poet who was over one hundred years old, and had mocked Muhammad in his verses. Muhammad asked his companions: “Who will avenge me on this scoundrel?” One of them murdered Abu ‘Afak in his sleep. Likewise with another poet who mocked him: the poetess ‘Asma bint Marwan. Muhammad on another occasion cried out, “Will no one rid me of this daughter of Marwan?” One of Muhammad’s companions, ‘Umayr ibn ‘Adi, went to her house that night, where he found her sleeping next to her children. The youngest, a nursing babe, was in her arms. But that didn’t stop ‘Umayr from murdering her and the baby as well. Muhammad commended him: “You have done a great service to Allah and His Messenger, ‘Umayr!” (Ibn Ishaq, 674-676)
Then there was Ka’b bin Al-Ashraf, another poet whose crime was mocking Muhammad. Muhammad again asked his companions: “Who is willing to kill Ka’b bin Al-Ashraf who has hurt Allah and His Apostle?” One of the companions, Muhammad bin Maslama, answered, “O Allah’s Apostle! Would you like that I kill him?” When Muhammad said that he would, Muhammad bin Maslama said, “Then allow me to say a (false) thing (i.e. to deceive Kab).” Muhammad responded: “You may say it.” Muhammad bin Maslama duly lied to Ka’b, luring him into his trap, and murdered him. (Bukhari 5.59.369)
“Rajasthan: Maulana Mufti Nadeem threatens to gouge eyes and chop hands over ‘blasphemy’ in presence of Police, watch video,” OpIndia, June 5, 2022:
On June 4, a video of Maulana Mufti Nadeem of Bundi, Rajasthan, went viral on social media in which he threatened to gouge eyes and chop the hands of those who speak against Prophet Mohammad. The controversial statement came in the backdrop of the remarks made by Bharatiya Janata Party spokesperson Nupur Sharma. Maulana Mufti gave the provocative statement in the presence of Rajasthan Police.
The Muslim community had gone to meet the collector on June 3 to submit a memorandum regarding the remarks made by Sharma. While addressing the crowd at Collectorate premises in the presence of Police, Maulana Mufti said, “If the administration says it is not against the law, we will go against the law. If it is against the law, the local administration and the union government must listen… If she has done blasphemy against my master, which she has done, and if someone else does the same, listen carefully… take action against them. If you fail to take action, Muslims will take the matter into their hands.”
He added, “If Muslims give reactions, look at the history, whenever Muslims gave reaction against any community they became homeless. If you do not take action, we will react. This is not a request. This is an open threat. The Muslims from everywhere around the world will rise, and we know how to take revenge for the blasphemy against my master.”
Threatening to chop hands and gouge eyes for blasphemy, he said, “You can abuse me, I will tolerate. You can abuse my father, I will tolerate it. You can abuse my family, I will tolerate it. But if you speak even a word against my Nabi, your tongue will be cut. If you raise your hands, they will be chopped. If you raise your finger, it will be chopped. Even if you raise your eyes, we will gouge the eyes and throw them away. After that, you can throw us in jail or do a lathi-charge, we will tolerate it. But we cannot tolerate a word against Nabi.”…
CogitoErgoSum says
I don’t see Allah cutting the tongues of people who insult Muhammad. It seems that Allah does not care one way or another if Muhammad is insulted. What’s up with that? Isn’t that an insult to Muhammad in itself? Muhammad’s own god does not care enough about Muhammad to stop people from insulting him.
bill says
The Christian ‘god’ is exactly the same and does nothing to protect his followers (what ever the bible may claim otherwise) In fact if one reads the history of Christianity one sees that they been constantly murdering each other over differences of opinion about how their ‘god’ should be
worshipped.
raja says
bill,
Are you a jihadi? When did Christians kill each other over worship? Citation please.
PMK says
raja,
European Christians experienced what is known as the Protestant Reformation. Protestant denominations split from the Catholic Church, which had dominated most of Europe for a millennium. Much of the 1600s saw persecution on both sides and also religious wars. You can google Protestant Reformation Violence for a list of the five worst incidents of violence in that time period.
john smith says
One thing we we can be certain of Raja, Bill seams to have no respect at all towards Christians or Christianity.
somehistory says
Christians have never “killed each other over differences in worship.” some people who claimed to be Christian….which is not the same thing at all….have killed others.
no where does Jesus say to ‘kill’ another person; even when He advised buying a sword if a disciple did not have one, He was not saying kill another who may disagree.
this fighting between those who claimed to be Christian has been used as a weapon to slander Christianity since the beginning, but anyone who delves into the facts can see that it is not how Jesus said to do, nor how His True disciples behave toward others. Christians are told, “When being reviled, do not go reviling in return.” And, “As far as it depends upon you, be peaceable with all men,” and Paul even wrote that Christians should not be taking each other to court, but to settle matters between themselves in accord with Christ’s teachings.
Just don’t fall for the tactics used by enemies of Christianity, as this old, tired and untrue one is used.
john smith says
Somehistory, did you notice the way bill denounced our Christian God, I guarantee you this much he would never denounce allah in the same sort of way that you or I would. He would never call allah a filthy stinking sack of maggots and shit. WOULD YOU BILL..
somehistory says
Yes, John, I noticed. He is not the only person who comes to comment who will say such things about Christ and His Holy Father, our Creator. It’s rare that those ones will say what the “god’ of islam really is. Most people alive would not say the truth of it to a mozlum’s face or on a place where they congregate to encourage their self-improvement.
It proves that our Way is very different and our God is very different.
john smith says
Congratulations Raja, you’ve seen through him, how long does he believe he can go on trying to fool people on this site. He must think we are a load of idiots
CogitoErgoSum says
Bill, I have to disagree with you about the Christian god being the same as Allah. For one thing, the Christian god, in the form of Jesus, has never encouraged anyone to cut the tongue of anyone else – for any reason. If the god of Islam does encourage such an act and the Christian god does not, how can they be exactly the same? I fail to see the logic in your comment.
BTW, how would you know whether a god has protected someone or not? A god that has the power of granting eternal life, even though the physical body may die, may have decided to grant eternal life to a person even though that person may appear to be dead. So again, I don’t see your logic … or maybe you do not understand Christianity. I would say your argument needs more work.
libertyORdeath says
The only good thing I could say is that it’s about time for us to embrace this same type of refusal to “compromise”. I wish Western “conservatives” had as much determination to defend their way of life that this guy has. It might be crazy, but at least he believes in something.
gravenimage says
India: Muslim cleric says ‘if you speak even a word against my prophet, your tongue will be cut’
……………..
Orthodox Islam.
Why is India allowing this incitement to violence? About the only speech that should *not* be allowed are these calls for violence and murder.
Infidel says
The state in question – one that had a proud history of resisting muslim aggressors for 1000 years – is currently run by the Congress. The secular party that compounded the destruction of Indian civilization by both the muslims and the Brits
There lies your answer
raja says
Infidel,
The Brits plundered India in different ways and they also had missionaries who worked independent of the administration. I wonder how they destroyed the Indian civilization. Surely, it couldn’t have been worse than the jihadi and Lefty agenda? Could you elaborate please..
Infidel says
Raja
Two things that the Brits did:
– Interrupt the de-islamization of India by the Marathas, and empowering the Nizam of Hyderabad and letting him expand to the point that in 1947, his state was a considerably large state that incorporated Marathwada, Telengana and North-East Karnataka (former parts of the Bahamani sultanate)
– Empower Syed Ahmad Khan and working w/ him to create Aligarh Muslim University, which is where the ideological foundations of Pakistan were laid
– McCaulay system of education, where the entire history of pre-islamic India was re-written to show Hindus as the marauders. It’s only now, w/ newer research, including the works of Hiuen Tsang and Megasthenes, that it’s becoming known that pre-Islamic Hindu society (and even Hindu society during islamic rule) was far less dysfunctional than McCaulay presented
It wasn’t worse than Jihadis and Leftys, but it was close. As I’ve pointed out in the past, Britain played a heroic role in opposing Nazism and Communism, but is a villain when it came to opposing islam e.g. the Great Game, the Crimean War. (England, otoh, was very different, as the Third Crusade showed)
raja says
Infidel,
Thank you for educating me on the grave mistakes of Brits when it came to dealing with Islamic regimes. Unfortunate to know that the Brits failed in knowing the true enemy of mankind and his freedoms. The Brits seem to have played havoc with India as they probably thought that islam was “close” to Christianity.
Thank you again for the invaluable info on Brits dealing with Islamic demons.
Ren says
Muslims don’t want anybody to slander Muhammad, a scum.
David M says
This cleric doesn’t have much faith in his god if he gets so upset he has to kill anyone who speaks badly against Allah. Sounds like somebody caught up in a lie, knows it, yet doesn’t want to be reminded about it.
Devasur says
Lol, the hypocrisy these barbarians who abuse all Non Muslim religions. While they want to kill people for pointing out facts which their own Islamic scholars accepted it. Yet hindus are intolerant and these barbarians are example of tolerance and piece. MSM pimps trying their best to portray Islam and Muslims as such.
Kenneth J Johnson says
The prolem ithat anyting you say, evthmopst ionnouous, for a Muslem is blasphemy.
The key is not to talkk about anyting with a Musle, excep the weather., and even there yoiu must be cafeful. It must be difficult to live in a county where you cannot even have a conversation. KEN.
Fitna says
Even that won’t stop them from killing you. They’ll find another excuse. There was a story of a migrant in Europe, think it was Germany who killed a white guy because he looked happy and he was jealous.
I don’t know in how many ways it can be said, we need Muslims in this world like we need cancer. Non-Muslims nations need to deal with them with an iron fist.
The terrorists/radicals need to be wiped out. The rest should be given a chance to convert or leave our countries or face the same end. When you’re tolerant towards the intolerant, then they will destroy you. We need to be even more intolerant of them.
Fitna says
It’s the same BS with the hijab…if you wear this head-rag Muslim men won’t rape you. But they still do it anyways. They’ve attacked, raped, beheaded Muslim women.
Submitting to Islam is like submitting to a psychotic serial-killer. You exist at his pleasures and whims. If you annoy him or break his “sacred rules” he’ll use it as an excuse to torture, punish or kill you.
What we need to do is eradicate these psychos because they won’t give us any other options to live in peace with them.
raja says
Fitna,
If you do you are damned and if don’t you are damned anyway. If you go in front of a donkey it bites you and if you to the rear it kicks you..
somehistory says
I was watching an old western movie. the “good” guy laid his gun down, thinking the fighting for his life was over, when the main “bad” guy came through a doorway. The hero reached for his gun, and the bad guy warned him against it, and the hero retreated, even knowing the bad guy was going to shoot him.
and on another old movie, a guy had been poisoned and the doctors told him nothing could be done; it was a homicide, He had hours to live. Later in the show, while he was trying to find the guy who had given him the poison, another bad guy drew a gun on him and was ordering him about…with the “murdered” guy acting as if it made a big difference somehow.
Giving in to someone you know will kill you anyway, is just plain nuts.
James Lincoln says
somehistory,
Your second example alluded to one of my favorite film noir movies DOA (1949).
somehistory says
Yes, James. that’s it. Too bad he didn’t tell his girl at the beginning what he told her at the end.
James Lincoln says
Yep, somehistory.
We’ve all learned things just a little bit too late – without the ability to do a “do-over”.
Bob Seeger said it best in a song called “Against the Wind”:
“Wish I didn’t know now what I didn’t know then”…
somehistory says
James,
“If only”….often said phrase. And deeply felt phrase.
and there is a country music song with that same line about wishing to not know.
Kenneth J Johnson says
The problem is that anyting you say, even the most ionnocuous, for a Muslem is blasphemy. The key is not to talk about anyting with a Muslem, except the weather., and even there you must be careful. It must be difficult to live in a country where you cannot even have a conversation. KEN.
Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY) says
The poet Abu ‘Afak, the poetess “Asma bint Marwan, and the poet K’ab bin Al-Ashraf are noted for their mockery of the Prophet. But the content of their mockery is never given; their poems are never quoted. Does Arabic literature make use of the limerick form?
Maybe what we need, even more than a Muhammad art contest, is a Muhammad Limerick Contest. We need poetry like
There once was a prophet from Mecca
who gained widespread fame as hecka
‘v a caravan robber
who knew how to clobber
his victims and strangle their necka.
This doggerel is just a proof of concept. Surely better poetry is possible.
Infidel says
Problem w/ this cleric’s demand is that he and his ilk won’t stay shut about deities or revered figures in other religions. They are happy to blaspheme Christ, Moses, Abraham and other Judeo-Christian figures, mock Vishnu, Shiva, Kali and other Hindu deities and so on. And when people turn it around on Muhammad, they scream bloody murder
The way to deal w/ them is to start targeting them for violence when they ‘blaspheme’ any non-islamic deities, even if blasphemy is not a crime in any non-muslim country. Otherwise we’ll end up w/ a lopsided situation where Christ, Moses, Krishna, Buddha, et al can be derogated but Muhammad can’t
raja says
Infidel,
There must be some “level playing” field for all belief systems. Right now it is too lop-sided. The Crooks of the West and India don’t muster any strength to confront this grave injustice despite The Kashmir Files and wealth of info on the net. Who will bell the cat.
France stood its ground when targeted by sundry jihadi nations with regard to hijab or whatever. Israel has remained firm in its dealings with the Palis but India tamely licked the boots of the terror-happy nations. I can think of at least 4 nations (China and Myanmar included) who are holy cows viz a viz the terror supporters. It is high time India picks up a leaf or two from these nations. First it must shed itself of the image of a poor and third world nation, then the perspectives will change over a period of time.
Personally, I feel freedom of speech and expression should be absolute but that is just a pipe dream, with all the thuggish leaders (current lot) of the world hanging around.
Infidel says
I do support absolute freedom of speech in theory. However, when you have one group – the muslims – exercising a ‘street-veto’, you have the situation that you have now w/ Nupur Sharma. In order to reverse that, Hindus need to organize themselves and form groups of their own. There is one group in India – Shri Ram Sena Sangatan – led by a Hindu activist who started up in Bihar and is building up a presence in neighboring states – Jharkand, Bengal, UP… I was watching a video of him yesterday where he described that when some muslims wanted to run an anti-CAA demonstration in Patna (similar to Shaheen Bagh), he and his group organized a counter demonstration at the same site and shut down the entry and exit points, so that those thugs wouldn’t have the food supplies and other things that kept the Shaheen Bagh operation going for months. That muslim demonstration quickly faded
About France and Israel, I disagree. Just yesterday on this site, Dan Greenfield was pointing out how the Israeli government had banned Jews from getting anywhere near the Western Wall: this is how Congress governments used to treat Hindus who wanted to get to the converted sites in Ayodhya, Varanasi and Mathura. At least in India, you now have the start of a movement to recover these converted sites, and they’re even starting to look at the Quwaat ul islam mosque in Delhi which was built by destroying 27 Vaishnav and Jain temples.
India does need to take a page out of Burma, but not China. China is bent on enslaving muslims but keeping them in, and has extradition treaties w/ every muslim country to send back the Uyghurs. Burma did this right – they kicked out the Rohingyas, and don’t care where they go. One other advantage that Burma has is that they have no traitors in their midst: all their leaders, be it the current junta or Ahn San Syu Ki or Dr Thet Thet – all of them are on record as saying that the Rohingyas are terrorists and don’t belong in their country. If only India and the West were as lucky
Sri Lanka, for all its economic woes, is on the right track as well. After the Easter bombings 3 years ago, they cracked down heavily on muslims. During the Chinavirus lockdowns, they banned the burial of anybody, and had an arrangement w/ Maldives to send there any muslims who wanted to be buried. Sri Lanka also completely banned cow slaughter, much to the chagrin of muslims. If India combined the policies of Burma and Sri Lanka, they’d be well off
But the first thing India needs, as I have repeatedly noted, is a new Hindutva political party that promises to liberate all temples (currently, mosques, churches and gurudwaras are independent of any government control, but Hindu temples ain’t), repeal the 1991 act that locks the status of any religious structure to India’s independence in 1947, repeals secularism and socialism from the Indian constitution, restores the right to property and introduces the right to bear arms – the Second Amendment, and follow a foreign policy fully embracing Israel and Taiwan and severing relations w/ China. Once India has such a party threatening the BJP, the latter will be forced to end any appeasement or fear of muslims. Right now, the BJP just takes Hindutva votes for granted, just like the GOP does here w/ conservatives. Bring in a new party, and the BJP will fall in line
raja says
Infidel,
Thank you for the detailed reply on how India needs to pull up its socks viz a viz Islamic terror. You are a fountain of information. Regards..
James Lincoln says
Makes me think of Nazi Germany, when no one was allowed to criticize the Führer.
PMK says
This is their plan for the world. And we continue with a suicidal policy of letting them come to the West. They’re sadists and we are masochists. What a combination!!!
Andrew Blackadder says
This Indian mullah moron is obviously extremely shallow in his faith if he gets his wee knickers in such a twist when somebody, like me, calls his belief system nothing more than a Fascist Religious Cult…
So come get me cupcake and bring yer book with ya so I can stick it right up yer arse.
raja says
PMK,
Thank you for the reply. From what I understand from little known history, Protestantism came from Catholicism because the latter was seen to be too deviant from the original pattern of Christianity. Chief propeller for the protest was Martin Luther, who posted some 99 errors of the Catholic church on the doors of a church building. Then ensued all kinds of war, witch hunt against every perceived evils of the society, and tragically the state of the time got dragged into the “movement” / war. King Henry iv split the then church to fulfill his own lust. But to say that Christians kill each other over worship is highly misleading. Mind you, he has put it in present tense.