Order The Critical Qur’anhere. Order The History of Jihadhere.
Comments
Infidelsays
The idea by David to create bots based on quran verses, various places in the world that have muslims, and then have them generate stories about a jihad attack at place X sounded brilliant. Even though this may be the textbook definition of generating fake news, chances are that a lot of these bot generated stories would turn out to have varying degrees of truth
The parts where RS asks David to guess where the jihadist aimed for (the neck) was pretty hilarious!
gravenimagesays
Infidel, David Wood was not actually suggesting bot generated stories–i.e, “fake news”.
He said that you could set up a template and just plug in the appropriate details as news stories come up, since many of them are so predictable, both Jihad terror and pusillanimous Western authorities reactions’ to them. This is *not* the same as urging the creation of fake news at all.
gravenimagesays
Video: This Week in Jihad with David Wood and Robert Spencer
……………….
Yes, Robert Spencer certainly has a lot to answer for in authoring the Qur’an! 🙂
Is it perverse that I am actually enjoying reading The Critical Qur’an, even though the topic is so ugly. Darn great writing!
Of course, here are those who take this vicious tome at face value–in India, a Hindu man is murdered by his Muslim wife’s family. The family had previously tried to hang her–*twice*. The couple actually fled to a large city–but sadly they did not run far enough…
And yes–compulsion is rife in Islam. This just means that you can just ‘choose’ to die if you don’t want to convert to Islam.
Good that David Wood sent a book to that seminary student in Nigeria. Hope it gets there–and that, as Robert Spencer notes, he doesn’t have a Fulani postman…
Then in Egypt more constant oppression of Christians in Egypt–and this is under al Sisi, not the Muslim Brotherhood. And a Christian woman is insulted and assaulted *by her pharmacist*–then her report to the police is falsified. As noted, this is small potatoes compared to the horrors one finds in other parts of Dar-al-Islam. *Ugh*.
Then Singapore has banned The Kashmir Files–as if a film causes “community disharmony”, but the original violence does not. Just grotesque.
But *very* common. Any criticism or even acknowledgement of Islamic violence is regularly crushed. Never mind that appeasement *does not work*.
Then in France another Mohammed (Muhammed? Mohammad?) stabs a man–in the neck, unsurprisingly–and dismiss his open claim that he did so in the name of Allah. Yet authorities are still confused as to motive…
Also in France a knife-wielding Muslim terrorizes a church. Business as usual–imagine if this were the other way around–not that this would ever happen.
And yes–Anders Breivik was actually inspired by *Jihad violence*, not peaceful anti-Jihadists.
gravenimagesays
Infidel, Breivik did not attack Jihadists–he attacked his own countrymen, including children.
You are a decent person and I am sure you would do no such things.
Falsafasays
Brevik was guided by Mr Spencer and his rhetoric, egged on by the vitriol gushing out from the motley crew of bigots which follow him…see the ‚lovely‘ contributors above. You ‚jihad watch‘ fanatics all have blood on your hands!
gravenimagesays
What is the grotesque self-styled “Falsafa” babbling about now? How is preaching non-violence violent? Note that Breivik noted that he was inspired by violent *Jihadists*.
How are any of the posts above preaching violence?
He is just saying that noting that Jihadists are murdering people is having blood on our hands–actually murdering people, however, is not. This is Islamic “logic”.
Note that “Falsafa” has not a word of condemnation for all the Jihad atrocities cited in the above interview. But then, why would he?
gravenimagesays
Then there is the Muslim student in Australia who tried to murder the man renting her a room, stabbing him in the neck in the name of “Allah” while he as taking a nap with his five-year-old daughter. And now she is back in the news for trying to murder a fellow inmate who had been friendly to her and was just reading a book at the time. She had secreted the weapon in her Hijab.
She called the woman a “coward” for running and not just letting herself be murdered. And she has said that she would do it again. Will she be sent to a high security facility? Will she have her Hijab taken away? Likely not.
Teaching Jihadists that Islam is not factual? Why no–that would be “Islamophobic”. As Robert Spencer mentions, no doubt this Jihadist was allowed to read the Qur’an in prison.
And in Cologne a memorial to victims of the Armenian Genocide as taken down out of fear of reaction of Muslims in Germany. Say we are violent, and we will be violent…
And a Jihadist was kicked out of Sweden, but then goes no further than France, where he molests a nine-year-old boy. His lawyer claims that these are just “cultural differences”–that is, that Muslims are fine with abusing children. Isn’t this actually a problem? And yes–this is orthodox Islam.
And this is an ideology where same sex relations are fine so long as the victims are children or to be humiliated by rape. All that is *really* condemned are consensual same sex relationships. *Ugh*.
Then, the perp whines that his “life is destroyed”–no concern about his poor victim, of course, or understanding that if his life is destroyed it is that he did it himself.
Then, in Nigeria more Christians driven out and murdered–all while the Jihadists screamed “Allahu Akbar!”. Meanwhile, Muslims are playing the victims because exams were held at a university on Friday.
I’m sure Christians in Nigeria wish all they had to worry about was exams held on Sundays…
And the “Karen” thing is often deemed “racist”–that is, when an older white woman is either scared of minorities or else a stickler for the law. One case here involved a woman calling the police because some people were BBQing at Oakland’s Lake Merritt. Now, this actually *is* illegal, but is considered minor and is often flouted, especially during Summer weekends and often by African Americans.
This is hardly necessarily “racist”, though–and has even been applied to women who actually had good reason to consider themselves to be in a threatening situation. Ugly stuff.
Then in Italy an Imam imprisoned and beat his wife. This is actually Purdah, and is not necessarily in reaction to her having done anything wrong under Islam. This is what is happening to women all over Afghanistan during the Taliban.
Then, if this *is* in response to her having been an “adulterer” (often no more than speaking to an unrelated male) or having left Islam, this is often not ‘just’ imprisonment, but is accompanied by starvation. Just hideous.
Then in Yemen there are Muslims attacking each others’ Mosques. More proof that Shia are just as savage as Sunnis when they have superior numbers. And now such plots have reached the US–condemned by CAIR as “Islamophobia” until it turned out that the plotters were themselves Muslim.
Am I looking forward to next week’s “This Week in Jihad”? No, indeed!
Discover more from
Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.
Infidel says
The idea by David to create bots based on quran verses, various places in the world that have muslims, and then have them generate stories about a jihad attack at place X sounded brilliant. Even though this may be the textbook definition of generating fake news, chances are that a lot of these bot generated stories would turn out to have varying degrees of truth
The parts where RS asks David to guess where the jihadist aimed for (the neck) was pretty hilarious!
gravenimage says
Infidel, David Wood was not actually suggesting bot generated stories–i.e, “fake news”.
He said that you could set up a template and just plug in the appropriate details as news stories come up, since many of them are so predictable, both Jihad terror and pusillanimous Western authorities reactions’ to them. This is *not* the same as urging the creation of fake news at all.
gravenimage says
Video: This Week in Jihad with David Wood and Robert Spencer
……………….
Yes, Robert Spencer certainly has a lot to answer for in authoring the Qur’an! 🙂
Is it perverse that I am actually enjoying reading The Critical Qur’an, even though the topic is so ugly. Darn great writing!
Of course, here are those who take this vicious tome at face value–in India, a Hindu man is murdered by his Muslim wife’s family. The family had previously tried to hang her–*twice*. The couple actually fled to a large city–but sadly they did not run far enough…
And yes–compulsion is rife in Islam. This just means that you can just ‘choose’ to die if you don’t want to convert to Islam.
Good that David Wood sent a book to that seminary student in Nigeria. Hope it gets there–and that, as Robert Spencer notes, he doesn’t have a Fulani postman…
Then in Egypt more constant oppression of Christians in Egypt–and this is under al Sisi, not the Muslim Brotherhood. And a Christian woman is insulted and assaulted *by her pharmacist*–then her report to the police is falsified. As noted, this is small potatoes compared to the horrors one finds in other parts of Dar-al-Islam. *Ugh*.
Then Singapore has banned The Kashmir Files–as if a film causes “community disharmony”, but the original violence does not. Just grotesque.
But *very* common. Any criticism or even acknowledgement of Islamic violence is regularly crushed. Never mind that appeasement *does not work*.
Then in France another Mohammed (Muhammed? Mohammad?) stabs a man–in the neck, unsurprisingly–and dismiss his open claim that he did so in the name of Allah. Yet authorities are still confused as to motive…
Also in France a knife-wielding Muslim terrorizes a church. Business as usual–imagine if this were the other way around–not that this would ever happen.
And yes–Anders Breivik was actually inspired by *Jihad violence*, not peaceful anti-Jihadists.
gravenimage says
Infidel, Breivik did not attack Jihadists–he attacked his own countrymen, including children.
You are a decent person and I am sure you would do no such things.
Falsafa says
Brevik was guided by Mr Spencer and his rhetoric, egged on by the vitriol gushing out from the motley crew of bigots which follow him…see the ‚lovely‘ contributors above. You ‚jihad watch‘ fanatics all have blood on your hands!
gravenimage says
What is the grotesque self-styled “Falsafa” babbling about now? How is preaching non-violence violent? Note that Breivik noted that he was inspired by violent *Jihadists*.
How are any of the posts above preaching violence?
He is just saying that noting that Jihadists are murdering people is having blood on our hands–actually murdering people, however, is not. This is Islamic “logic”.
Note that “Falsafa” has not a word of condemnation for all the Jihad atrocities cited in the above interview. But then, why would he?
gravenimage says
Then there is the Muslim student in Australia who tried to murder the man renting her a room, stabbing him in the neck in the name of “Allah” while he as taking a nap with his five-year-old daughter. And now she is back in the news for trying to murder a fellow inmate who had been friendly to her and was just reading a book at the time. She had secreted the weapon in her Hijab.
She called the woman a “coward” for running and not just letting herself be murdered. And she has said that she would do it again. Will she be sent to a high security facility? Will she have her Hijab taken away? Likely not.
Teaching Jihadists that Islam is not factual? Why no–that would be “Islamophobic”. As Robert Spencer mentions, no doubt this Jihadist was allowed to read the Qur’an in prison.
And in Cologne a memorial to victims of the Armenian Genocide as taken down out of fear of reaction of Muslims in Germany. Say we are violent, and we will be violent…
And a Jihadist was kicked out of Sweden, but then goes no further than France, where he molests a nine-year-old boy. His lawyer claims that these are just “cultural differences”–that is, that Muslims are fine with abusing children. Isn’t this actually a problem? And yes–this is orthodox Islam.
And this is an ideology where same sex relations are fine so long as the victims are children or to be humiliated by rape. All that is *really* condemned are consensual same sex relationships. *Ugh*.
Then, the perp whines that his “life is destroyed”–no concern about his poor victim, of course, or understanding that if his life is destroyed it is that he did it himself.
Then, in Nigeria more Christians driven out and murdered–all while the Jihadists screamed “Allahu Akbar!”. Meanwhile, Muslims are playing the victims because exams were held at a university on Friday.
I’m sure Christians in Nigeria wish all they had to worry about was exams held on Sundays…
And the “Karen” thing is often deemed “racist”–that is, when an older white woman is either scared of minorities or else a stickler for the law. One case here involved a woman calling the police because some people were BBQing at Oakland’s Lake Merritt. Now, this actually *is* illegal, but is considered minor and is often flouted, especially during Summer weekends and often by African Americans.
This is hardly necessarily “racist”, though–and has even been applied to women who actually had good reason to consider themselves to be in a threatening situation. Ugly stuff.
Then in Italy an Imam imprisoned and beat his wife. This is actually Purdah, and is not necessarily in reaction to her having done anything wrong under Islam. This is what is happening to women all over Afghanistan during the Taliban.
Then, if this *is* in response to her having been an “adulterer” (often no more than speaking to an unrelated male) or having left Islam, this is often not ‘just’ imprisonment, but is accompanied by starvation. Just hideous.
Then in Yemen there are Muslims attacking each others’ Mosques. More proof that Shia are just as savage as Sunnis when they have superior numbers. And now such plots have reached the US–condemned by CAIR as “Islamophobia” until it turned out that the plotters were themselves Muslim.
Am I looking forward to next week’s “This Week in Jihad”? No, indeed!