Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Justice Alito and Family at Undisclosed Location, Pro-Life Group Firebombed In Night of Leftist Terror

By

This is what Biden and Psaki refuse to condemn. It’s what the media carefully avoids denouncing.

Vandals set a fire inside the Madison headquarters of the pro-life group Wisconsin Family Action early Sunday, police and an official with the group said Sunday.

Investigators are calling the fire at the building, on Madison’s North Side near the Dane County Regional Airport, an arson.

Arriving at the office at 2801 International Lane at the same time as a reporter, Appling and group event coordinator Diane Westphall found shattered glass from a broken window covering a corner office riddled with burned books. The smell of smoke persisted for hours after the fire, which damaged the corner office carpet and the wall beneath the window.

The outside of the building was also sprayed with graffiti depicting an anarchy symbol, a coded anti-police slogan and the phrase, “If abortions aren’t safe then you aren’t either.”

Meanwhile, the targeted harassment of Supreme Court justices continues to escalate with the complicity of the Biden administration.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito is paying a price for authoring a draft opinion that was leaked last week in which he and four other justices appear to be on the verge of overturning the Roe v. Wade decision that legalized abortion.

For the sake of safety, Alito has reportedly been moved to a location that will not be revealed, according to Breitbart.

Last week, Alito canceled an appearance at the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals’ judicial conference. Although no official reason was given for the cancellation, the move came only days after fierce protests greeted the leak of the opinion.

This is political terrorism.

The same folks who effectively outlawed protests after the election have now unleashed their mob to terrorize judges. Imagine if conservative groups were protesting outside the homes of Elana Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor. They’d all be doxxed, fired, and serving six-month sentences. 

Even if the Dems can’t pack the court, they’re using their mobs to intimidate judges. And the mobs know that they’re being covered for by the media and the administration.

Comments

  1. Honestly, what else would you expect from a mob of baby-killers?

  2. Women hoping that their daughters in Texas and other Christianity Rules!!! states will not be forced to have a rapist’s kid, but not that any of you good Christian men would care. It will never be your daughter… will it?

    All this has really clarified how much Christianity and its virgin gods and goddesses hate sex and how much your basic attitude is “Woman! What Have I To Do With Theeeeee?!?’

    I have a bunch of “godless” friends who still insist you are better than the Left because you have “values”. Well, one of your “values” is thinking I have never had a right to my own life. Or your wives, daughters, sisters, mothers and those girlfriends on the side.

    • Put a sock in in you leftie loonie.

      That’s the first thing you kooks bring up: What about rape and incest?

      Okay, how about at least that’s a start? We’ll allow it for rape and incest, if you grant our position when it’s not rape or incest.

      By the way. Babies of rape are still human, and plenty have testified they are SO GRATEFUL their mothers had the GRACE to go through the pregnancy and give them life.

      You just can’t get it through your science denying skulls, a fetus (Which is LATIN for BABY) is ALWAYS a genetically separate human life and not just a clump of the mother’s tissue, and ALL YOU WANT is the right to kill one so you don’t have to take responsibility for your actions,.

      As for Christians hating sex, you gotta be flipping NUTS

      I’d say use the brain God gave you for a second and THINK, but you want “God” out of this, so let’s go with the logic of what happens when people commit “immoral” acts.

      Right or wrong doesn’t even have to come into the picture.

      Every single action considered “immoral” EXPONETIALLY increases the chances of getting in trouble, of having an accident or wreck and it ALWAYS costs to recover from a wreck.

      Which means you are set back in life.

      Maybe the mortgage payment now had to go to a lawyer bill.

      Or maybe somebody drank the money away, or used it on drugs, and a family couldn’t put food on the table.

      Or maybe you got fired because you CHOSE to do the wrong thing.

      It’s the same with sex, but this is the ONLY case where people are demanding as solution, the slaughter a COMPLETELY INNOCENT, DEFENSELESS HUMAN BEING.

      And now your side is even demanding the right to kill a baby a week after it’s been born, when you’ve ALREADY GONE THROUGH all the “stigma” of pregnancy, and all you have to do is abandon the baby at one of those “Safe Abandonment” places.

      ALL you want, is the right to kill a human being. That’s it. Case closed.

      If you’re so sure a baby in the womb isn’t human, PROVE IT.

      Provide scientific data, not somebody’s OPINION.

      • Well said, but this woman won’t even blink an eye in admission that you are right.

        • Probably, she won’t.

          But as that saying goes,

          “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men should do nothing.”

      • Regarding “the right to kill a baby a week after it’s been born”:

        Of course, these infants would be killed with dignity (sarc) with an injection or gas or some other humane way of killing.

        They would not be killed by stabbing the back of their heads at the spinal column, or by collapsing their skulls, or by snipping off their limbs like in an abortion.

        No, killing infants less than a week old would be done with dignity and in a humane manner.

        And disposal of their bodies ? Here again, it would be done with humanely. Not like with aborted babies that are thrown in to dumpsters, picked up by medical waste services in plastic drums, stored, or thrown in the trash. Of course, like for older people, their bodies could be sold scientific purposes or organ donation.

        No, these infants would be buried or cremated. By one week they may even have a name, or a wrist band that says male or female.

        Names on their graves or urns would be optional, of course.
        Also, death notices in the newspapers would be optional, but one would have to file with a government registrar, unlike with an abortion situation.

        NB: The idea of infanticide being legal is “out there” now.
        Maryland Senate Bill 669, otherwise known as the Pregnant Person’s Freedom Act of 2022, sponsored by Senator William Smith, would allow mothers to “abort” their baby a whole 4 weeks after it has left the womb. Many believe infanticide should be allowed after birth for several years.

        • Keys,

          You sound like me….when I get heated up with this issue, I can forget to use punctuation and likely misspell many words. Your points were so well made, I didn’t notice any typos or errors.

          These people are ghouls. Demon-possessed, followers of molech.

    • “Well, one of your “values” is thinking I have never had a right to my own life. ”

      There are so many assumptions in your comments that you appear to be a drive-by commenter, unfamiliar with the authors or readers.

      Abortion as convenience assumes that a conceived human, “never had a right to its own life” for 9 months, to paraphrase your potential “victim” claim. At least, your mother gave you, “a right to my own life”.

      California will happily be a national abortion mill along with 20 and more other states. Abortion will always be available in the US with a little effort and with less restrictions than in the EU.

      As an Agnostic, I have no religious stake in the abortion question. It’s simply a respect for human life and a stable society that informs a cautious approach to abortion.

    • A whole host of Christians have family members who have gone through with pregnancy when, if it had been your group, the outcome would have been so different.

      NY, CA, WA, OR, CO governors have already promised the baby-killers will be only too happy to take out the babies of those females who have done something and refuse to accept responsibility for their actions. Some companies have already said they will pay for the travel for those women if they live in the MORAL states of MS, TX, FL, SD,…

      If you stay in a lovely hotel room, if you have a fancy party someplace, if you eat at a four star restaurant, you expect to “pay the price” for your enjoyment; but if you engage in sex, you want to avoid all of the price, but esp if an innocent child…who has no “choice” in any of it…no choice as to who is the mother, father, or his/her own life…and would not want to die.

      Babies are killed in the most horrible of ways. But, rra, you don’t give even a little bit of your self-righteous care for the baby. Nearly 93% of baby-killing is done out of lazy, selfish, convenience. Acknowledge that fact, why don’t you?

    • revereridesagain, your constant implications that only rape victims have abortions is just absurd. Never mind that in many cases exceptions in abortion bans are made for just this reason–this is just a canard.

  3. I think I now understand the meaning of “Do not resist the evil person.” It is better to let these people stop reproducing themselves. As their numbers decline ours will grow.
    When there are no other choices but ones that seem bad, choose the one that does the least harm. Allowing these people to destroy themselves may seem wrong now but in the long run it is the right thing to do.

    • It seems a logical expectation for the results of unimpeded abortion. Unfortunately, young women seeing the examples of unmarried sex, as recreation without “apparent” consequence, might be inclined to follow the examples and become new examples, themselves.

      • Perhaps, but the Soviet Union and Communist China allowed abortion and now their populations are in decline. It is important to teach our children a good set of moral values and hope that more of them will stick with those those values than those that will not. Planting seeds is an act of faith and hope.

  4. Supposedly, biden has condemned the arson. But, will he say it shouldn’t happen again, willl he say that the Justices should be left alone, will he say that the Justices should be allowed to stay in peace in theier own homes with their families…or will he and his spokes “person” say there should be peaceful…knowing it won’t be…protests because people are “angry and scared”?

    Imagine the ‘scared” babies if they could only know what their mothers and the “doctors” are going to do to them, what they have already done to millions upon millions of other small children, tiny children who only want to be loved and cared for and “welcomed” in to the homes of those who ***caused**** the babies to be.

  5. This urgent insanity, A flirtation with mass nuclear death and destruction, sure, but worth it if only we erase that evil Amerika.

    Distracted by simultaneous crises [ inspired by Cloward-Piven ] the cementum holding the Republic will fail, and world will be again free.

    The the world will return to the perpetual tranquility we enjoyed until the tragedy of the Enlightenment.

    A Swiss chemist isolated lysergic acid compounds at the height of the movement to “amend” our geological water tables with, eh, salts of flouride [ for our teeth, see? ]. Or, am I reading too much in this?

    • The real problem is, I’m trapped in the future with a bunch of crazy people who’ve taken over.

      I have to get back to 1963 and warn them.

    • The the world will return to the perpetual tranquility we enjoyed until the tragedy of the Enlightenment.
      …………..

      Sarcasm?

  6. Of more importance than the abortion issue is the issue of the independence of the Supreme Court. That is where the administration should be exerting its influence and definitely not in criticizing the Court. After all it is the last bastion of the law and of order in society.
    If the legislators disagree with a law after the Supreme Court has dealt with it they have the option of changing that law within the appropriate legal parameters. If that means that each State must deal with it individually so be it.

    • The Supreme Court is supposed to be free of the influence of the Executive and Legislative branches of our government. The administration should be concerned with carrying out the laws passed by the legislature and the judiciary should concern itself with deciding which laws are Constitutional if a dispute arises. Apparently, the people of the United States no longer understand how their government was designed to work.

      • and they don’t want to “understand” the design. They want it to be as they please to act at any given time
        as Mr. Greenfield says, their violence is free speech and for those whom they oppose, free speech is violence. they make up their own laws.

        • You are right. They don’t want to understand it. They want to destroy it. That’s why I no longer care if they kill their own children and they go extinct. Those who love America as it was should be fruitful and multiply and then teach their children to be strong in the ways that are good. We will inherit the Earth.

        • Jesus said we would “inherit the earth,” and told us to Pray for the “earth” to be made, by God’s Kingdom, like “heaven.”

          No such evil exists in heaven where God does His will, and as He will do “on earth as it is in heaven.” That’s the “earth” we “will inherit.”

          I pray for that every day. It’s difficult to be patient, but I keep Jesus’ promises in mind and heart, and try not to dwell on the awful things around me, but to pray that He end them all, and soon.

        • The unborn who are aborted and the innocents who are killed will find justice … and so will we all. I feel no guilt about the sins of others nor do I feel I am washing my hands of anyone’s blood. I will trust that what awaits me is a place better than this.

  7. This is what a real insurrection looks like. Not the people who loitered around in the Capitol on January 6th taking selfies of themselves

    • Yes, because the Court is there to decide if a Law is Constitutional or not. They don’t make the laws, they don’t enforce the laws and they don’t use the laws as politicians do.

      So, when violence is used to terrify them and their families, it is a criminal act and the “protestors” seek to overthrow the very entity that supports the Constitution more than any other.

      • One could reasonably expect the President to act as a calming influence in these situations and support the SC — even when he doesn’t like the decision.

        • You are talking about a Marxist cabal that runs the US, and a completely dazed Biden is just the figurehead. A part of me is sympathetic towards him given the way he is being abused, but I absolutely have no sympathy for this government, which is being manipulated by a Leftist bureaucracy, as opposed to being run openly from the front

      • somehistory says,

        “…the Court is there to decide if a Law is Constitutional or not.”

        I’m not an attorney, but I do understand that that is the function of the US Supreme Court.

        Regardless of one’s opinion regarding what Roe vs. Wade, I can’t understand how something could be “Constitutional” in 1973 but – the very same thing – not “Constitutional” in 2022.

        That being said I would personally favor overturning Roe vs. Wade – and let the individual states make their own laws.

        • James,

          even rbg said that the Court was wrong in ’73 and she was in favor of baby-killing.

          the guys back in ’73 were wrong. They may have been pressured, threatened or just in favor of it also, but they made a wrong decision.
          Other wrong decisions have been made since then, and possibly before.
          The Constitution says “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness”…and it gives no age limit…early or late. And the “rights” said nothing about when a person was in the “right” on outright taking of the life of another person.
          Self-defense in court has to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt, and this issue isn’t even self-defense.

          Children are expected to learn to exercise self-control. so, how come adults decide that other adults don’t have to do likewise?
          I posted some info on the Glaxov Gang with Daniel Greenfield that I received in my email today. It should be enough to make anyone take a stand against this horrific practice that has been allowed for all of these years.

        • I have taken a look at the leaked Court decision and it says the 1973 decision was wrong and it cites some other Court decisions that were wrong and later overturned. The Court does sometimes make mistakes but those mistakes can be corrected later. The Court is not supposed to make laws and it found no place in the Constitution any support for the idea that a woman has the right to an abortion. The draft (if not changed) says the individual states can decide for themselves what to do about abortion. Abortion everywhere in the U.S. will not be outlawed by this decision. It is despicable of the President and the media to be acting as if it will be.

        • Yes, it is despicably evil to make all of the claims they are making in order to get more people on their side of this issue, by bringing up things that won’t be changed.

          Justice Thomas has a White wife, but they are claiming that interracial marriages will be outlawed, as well as a bunch of other stuff.

          I just hope and pray that the Court doesn’t waffle. If they do, then there is nothing the mob won’t do to get their way…on everything. they will see the violence and threats…arson and assault…as working for them and won’t stop.

        • “I can’t understand how something could be “Constitutional” in 1973 but – the very same thing – not “Constitutional” in 2022.”

          Neither do I, James Lincoln.

          It must be a matter of interpretation, and perhaps a balancing of the different parts of the Constitution. Hence, decisions are not always – in fact, rarely, I think – unanimous.

          Also, applying it to the 21st century could be a matter of interpretation; especially if the Legislature does not do it’s job (ex: regulation of social media sites on the internet to protect free speech).

          In fact, one vote could make the difference between constitutional or unconstitutional. This always made me uncomfortable!

          I am sure you believe that “Dred Scott” was wrongly decided. Humans are fallible; judges are human; therefore …..

  8. “Reporter calls for violence against pro-lifers, says they shouldn’t have ‘peace or safety’ until they’re dead”

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/reporter-calls-for-violence-against-pro-lifers-says-they-shouldn-t-have-peace-or-safety-until-they-re-dead/ar-AAX4zDY?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=

    “A reporter for Rewire News Group called for “more” violence against pro-life Americans over the weekend as she appeared to celebrate reports of vandalism against the headquarters of a pro-life group in Wisconsin.”

    • The moral code of some of these pro-abortion people is like that of Islam. You either have to submit to them or they will kill you.

      • Yes,..the same. In NYC, they threatened to bomb a church, so the PD told the priest not to continue with their usual procedures because they couldn’t protect them… This is the same as when mozlums are threatening and women are told not to go out alone, and to dress differently, etc.

    • *Deeply* disturbing stuff, Somehistory. Thanks for that link.

      Calling for violence is about the only speech *not* protected by the First Amendment.

  9. And this from the despicable pelosi….who makes the claim of having a favorite Bible verse, encouraging the angry, violent mobs. She has no clue, in her evil witch’s head, the meaning of the word “righteous.”

    “”While we have seen and heard extraordinary anguish in our communities,” Pelosi, D-Calif., said, “we have been moved by how so many have channeled their righteous anger into meaningful action: planning to march and mobilize to make their voices heard.”
    In the statement, Pelosi also attacked Republicans and the Supreme Court over the expected ruling, and says that Democrats will “fight relentlessly to enshrine Roe v. Wade as the law of the land.”
    If any one of the Justices, or anyone at a church, is injured by these mobs, pelosi, schumer and bidne should be held accountable. and warren too.

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/pelosi-lauds-protesters-using-righteous-anger-to-march-and-mobilize-as-supreme-court-set-to-overturn-roe/ar-

  10. I’m certainly in favour of people “controlling” themselves but it is somewhat Pollyanna-ish to expect it to happen to any significant degree. I suggest that the same people would be “sloppy” in 2022 as in 1973. Similarly, simply saying “no” to a rapist is probably just as ineffective today as then.
    That doesn’t mean that I support “abortion on demand” nor does it mean that I don’t. Since I’m not female I don’t really feel entitled to be part of the debate.
    However, the reality is that, for the most part, the same people will get an abortion regardless of what the law says.– whether they travel to where it is legal (the more affluent) or seek out the local amateur armed with a coat hanger.
    On balance it would probably wiser for society to allow abortions to some degree.

  11. Going to the homes of the Justices is actually a violation of federal law about intimidation of judges, jurors, witnesses, in order to get a different verdict.

  13. Justice Alito and Family at Undisclosed Location, Pro-Life Group Firebombed In Night of Leftist Terror
    …………………..

    Just appalling–worse than I thought it would be. I suppose I should not have been surprised. I hope Justice Alito, his family, and his colleagues stay safe.

  14. This political terrorism conducted by the Left will likely backfire on them during the upcoming mid-terms.

    But they just can’t help themselves…

  15. These same rioters for abortion, would riot against the death penalty for a person who committed mass murders of children. Confused! I’d vote for the baby being allowed to take that first breath. The murderer had that right and freely abused it.

Discover more from

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Skip to content