Normally, I groan at very long videos, but great to see a wide variety of topics discussed?
1:00 Why isn’t ‘The Critical Qur’an available’ on Nook in ebook format? Last I checked, there are no supply chain issues w/ slaughtered trees: all one needs, if I have it right, is the book in one of the Adobe formats that makes it viewable in ebook wrappers like Kindle or Nook. On a different note, it would be useful to also be able to revisit your series ‘Blogging the Qur’an’ that you did on HotAir several years ago
Talking about Hindi translators, I’d suggest Neeraj Atri (who is an occasional guest on The Jaipur Dialogues), who’s written books of his own in Hindi covering islam. If all he were doing were translating it, it would make his job somewhat quicker
Also, Robert, you should promote your book ‘Did Muhammad exist’ there as well, so that they know that Muhammad is even more fictitious than the Hindu deities that muslims like to deride as imaginary
12:00 It’s supposed to be clear…. It sure is – as clear as mud! ?
14:00 Instead of using the example of the Chicoms, I’d have used the example of the Burmese. The Burmese, who had problems w/ their muslims, kicked them out and let them flee anywhere. The Chicoms, by contrast, have an extradition agreement w/ every muslim country, so that the Uyghurs can’t flee to a muslim country w/o fear of extradition, and then they are forced to flee to non-muslim countries, thereby endangering their citizens. The Rohingyas, otoh, can flee to countries like Bangladesh, Pakistan and Malaysia: they don’t have to be sheltered in India, even if the BJP government is stupid enough to do it
20:00 The straightforward answer to Vibhuti’s question of ‘which islam’ is sunni, since they are 90%+ of the ummah. Of course, one can then break it down into Hanafi, Shafi’i, etc, or in the case of the sub-continent, Deobandi vs Barellvi
21:00 I’m glad he brought up the issue of halal economics: something we need to cover more out here
23:00 Nowadays, I have pork – be it bacon or sausage or rib-eye – as often as I can, to avoid the possibility of halal meat. As for other foods, I check the labels and avoid halal whenever I can
33:00 In his otherwise excellent coverage of this problem, Sanjay Dixit has one blind spot: a love of ‘Pasmanda’ muslims, who are native Indian muslims not descendant at all from Arabs or Turks or Pathans or anyone. This despite the fact that those groups are as active participants in jihad against Hindus in various riots throughout India
34:00 Despite islam being a vehicle of Arab supremacy, it’s funny that non-Arab peoples – Turks, Pakistanis, Iranians – all wanna claim the leadership of islam
1:04:00 No, India was not calling out what islam had done to it for years. They were always in a mode of denial: it wasn’t until 2014 that things finally started becoming better known by the population at large
1:09:00 Where can I get RS’ ‘The Ladies’ guide to Kuraan’? Maybe someone can translate it from Kannada ?
1:10:00 Is there a Nook edition of the book? I boycott Amazon b’cos they are one of the top woke companies
All in all, a great interview
Walter Sieruksays
As covered in the interview of this above video those “e-radicalization programs” just don’t work .
The reason is why those systems “de-radicalization” is because they are based on the false premise that “Islam is a non-violent peaceful religion”
What is needed is a n Islam de-programming system. which recognizes that Islam is violent and deadly religion because its based on the Qu ‘ran which does instruct in violence and killing for the cause of Islam. As found in for example Sura 2:191. 4:89. 5;33..9:5,111,112. 47:4.
Therefore, for an effective Islamic de-programming to successful the foundation for this deadly violent false the Muslim needs to come to understand and sincerely acknowledge that Islam is false because is based on the Qu ‘ran.
A good place to start is such a system is in THE ISLAMIC INVASION by Robert Morey on pages 145 through 157 in which he wrote a section on the Qu‘ran with its self-contradictions. Just two of the many he cited are the following “The Qu’ran differs on whether a day is a thousand years or fifty thousand years i n God’s sight’ and “Who was first to believe? Abraham or Moses [Sura 6:14 versus 7:143]? The above is inconsistent and illogical.
Further, Morey wrote about “The fact that Judaism and Christianity broke up into different sects was used in the Qu ‘ran to prove that they are not of God [Suras 30:20-32. 42:13, 14]. Yet Islam has broken up into many warring sects and therefore cannot be true if the Quran is right.”
Moreover, Morey in his book shows many more contradictions and absurdities in the Quran, there are and how Muhammad incorporated extra Biblical and Jewish folklore along with pre-Islamic Arabian myth and parts of Zoroastrian and Hindu stories into the Qu ‘ran.
Furthermore, the Muslims claim that “the Qu ‘ran is the direct, literal word of God unmodified in any way by the Prophet who uttered them at the bidding of God.” In addition , in the book UNVEILING ISLAM by Ergun Mehmet Caner and Eethi Caner has shown that the Qu ‘ran was modified in the following account on pages 45. “Muhammad felt the need to improve on the words of Allah, since he changed Allah’s wisdom for his own on several occasions. A hadith tells of the nonchalant emendations of Muhammad:.
’On a number of occasions he [a scribe] had, with the Prophet’s consent changed the closing words of verses. For example, when the prophet had said ‘God is mighty and wise ‘ Adbollah b. Abi Sarh suggested writing down ‘Knowing and wise’ and the Prophet answered that there was no objection. Having observed a succession of changes of this type, Adbollah renounced Islam on the grounds that revelations, if from God could not be changed at the prompting of a scribe such as himself. After his apostasy he went to Mecca and joined the Qorayshites.’ Other writers reveal that later Muhammad and his people did go war with the Qorayshites and he personally killed Abdollah. Obviously Abdollah knew too much and Muhammad wanted Abdollah’s knowledge to die with him.”
In conclusion, the Qu ‘ran is not only a fiction, it’s also a hoax.
Walter Sieruksays
One of the many topic regarding Islam on this video is the ploy that some Muslims use is the charge on anyone who seems suspicious of them is making the charge of “racial profiling” against him or her.
This is absurd , because Islam is not a race but a religious ‘political / Sharia system that has complete tyrannical control over the beliefs , ideas ,values and behavior of millions of people around the world.
Relating to to topic , before I retired I’m a senior citizen I had ,for a time ,in the past worked in security and some Muslims who seemed a bit suspicious of caught on quick that I was watching them and then one of them ask “We want to know , do you have a problem with us ? So I answered honesty “We under yellow alert.” At that the Muslim who asked that question pointed his finger at me and said “you have committed racial profiling that is illegal ”
Well in reality I had maybe committed “religious profiling ” but not the other .for a already exampled Islam is not a race..
In fact at the gym that i had gone to at that time I another gym member at that place was a Muslim, a White Muslim, who has converted from Roman Catholicism to Islam . So at my station if he was there knowing his religion I would keep an eye on him also .
Getting back ti what actually happened at the most in reality I was guilty of was a politically incorrect “thought crime” So what ! Maybe he should have called the :”thought police” and have them take me to jail for a “politically incorrect thought”
Maybe America is becoming l, somewhat, like the nation in the novel “1984”
Deborah R. Evanssays
Very insightful and informative as well as honest. Thank you.
Discover more from
Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.
Infidel says
Normally, I groan at very long videos, but great to see a wide variety of topics discussed?
1:00 Why isn’t ‘The Critical Qur’an available’ on Nook in ebook format? Last I checked, there are no supply chain issues w/ slaughtered trees: all one needs, if I have it right, is the book in one of the Adobe formats that makes it viewable in ebook wrappers like Kindle or Nook. On a different note, it would be useful to also be able to revisit your series ‘Blogging the Qur’an’ that you did on HotAir several years ago
Talking about Hindi translators, I’d suggest Neeraj Atri (who is an occasional guest on The Jaipur Dialogues), who’s written books of his own in Hindi covering islam. If all he were doing were translating it, it would make his job somewhat quicker
Also, Robert, you should promote your book ‘Did Muhammad exist’ there as well, so that they know that Muhammad is even more fictitious than the Hindu deities that muslims like to deride as imaginary
12:00 It’s supposed to be clear…. It sure is – as clear as mud! ?
14:00 Instead of using the example of the Chicoms, I’d have used the example of the Burmese. The Burmese, who had problems w/ their muslims, kicked them out and let them flee anywhere. The Chicoms, by contrast, have an extradition agreement w/ every muslim country, so that the Uyghurs can’t flee to a muslim country w/o fear of extradition, and then they are forced to flee to non-muslim countries, thereby endangering their citizens. The Rohingyas, otoh, can flee to countries like Bangladesh, Pakistan and Malaysia: they don’t have to be sheltered in India, even if the BJP government is stupid enough to do it
20:00 The straightforward answer to Vibhuti’s question of ‘which islam’ is sunni, since they are 90%+ of the ummah. Of course, one can then break it down into Hanafi, Shafi’i, etc, or in the case of the sub-continent, Deobandi vs Barellvi
21:00 I’m glad he brought up the issue of halal economics: something we need to cover more out here
23:00 Nowadays, I have pork – be it bacon or sausage or rib-eye – as often as I can, to avoid the possibility of halal meat. As for other foods, I check the labels and avoid halal whenever I can
33:00 In his otherwise excellent coverage of this problem, Sanjay Dixit has one blind spot: a love of ‘Pasmanda’ muslims, who are native Indian muslims not descendant at all from Arabs or Turks or Pathans or anyone. This despite the fact that those groups are as active participants in jihad against Hindus in various riots throughout India
34:00 Despite islam being a vehicle of Arab supremacy, it’s funny that non-Arab peoples – Turks, Pakistanis, Iranians – all wanna claim the leadership of islam
50:00 On the question about the Kashmir Files, if you were referring to David Wood, he did a review of the movie here – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFCKuMPZRHA
1:04:00 No, India was not calling out what islam had done to it for years. They were always in a mode of denial: it wasn’t until 2014 that things finally started becoming better known by the population at large
1:09:00 Where can I get RS’ ‘The Ladies’ guide to Kuraan’? Maybe someone can translate it from Kannada ?
1:10:00 Is there a Nook edition of the book? I boycott Amazon b’cos they are one of the top woke companies
All in all, a great interview
Walter Sieruk says
As covered in the interview of this above video those “e-radicalization programs” just don’t work .
The reason is why those systems “de-radicalization” is because they are based on the false premise that “Islam is a non-violent peaceful religion”
What is needed is a n Islam de-programming system. which recognizes that Islam is violent and deadly religion because its based on the Qu ‘ran which does instruct in violence and killing for the cause of Islam. As found in for example Sura 2:191. 4:89. 5;33..9:5,111,112. 47:4.
Therefore, for an effective Islamic de-programming to successful the foundation for this deadly violent false the Muslim needs to come to understand and sincerely acknowledge that Islam is false because is based on the Qu ‘ran.
A good place to start is such a system is in THE ISLAMIC INVASION by Robert Morey on pages 145 through 157 in which he wrote a section on the Qu‘ran with its self-contradictions. Just two of the many he cited are the following “The Qu’ran differs on whether a day is a thousand years or fifty thousand years i n God’s sight’ and “Who was first to believe? Abraham or Moses [Sura 6:14 versus 7:143]? The above is inconsistent and illogical.
Further, Morey wrote about “The fact that Judaism and Christianity broke up into different sects was used in the Qu ‘ran to prove that they are not of God [Suras 30:20-32. 42:13, 14]. Yet Islam has broken up into many warring sects and therefore cannot be true if the Quran is right.”
Moreover, Morey in his book shows many more contradictions and absurdities in the Quran, there are and how Muhammad incorporated extra Biblical and Jewish folklore along with pre-Islamic Arabian myth and parts of Zoroastrian and Hindu stories into the Qu ‘ran.
Furthermore, the Muslims claim that “the Qu ‘ran is the direct, literal word of God unmodified in any way by the Prophet who uttered them at the bidding of God.” In addition , in the book UNVEILING ISLAM by Ergun Mehmet Caner and Eethi Caner has shown that the Qu ‘ran was modified in the following account on pages 45. “Muhammad felt the need to improve on the words of Allah, since he changed Allah’s wisdom for his own on several occasions. A hadith tells of the nonchalant emendations of Muhammad:.
’On a number of occasions he [a scribe] had, with the Prophet’s consent changed the closing words of verses. For example, when the prophet had said ‘God is mighty and wise ‘ Adbollah b. Abi Sarh suggested writing down ‘Knowing and wise’ and the Prophet answered that there was no objection. Having observed a succession of changes of this type, Adbollah renounced Islam on the grounds that revelations, if from God could not be changed at the prompting of a scribe such as himself. After his apostasy he went to Mecca and joined the Qorayshites.’ Other writers reveal that later Muhammad and his people did go war with the Qorayshites and he personally killed Abdollah. Obviously Abdollah knew too much and Muhammad wanted Abdollah’s knowledge to die with him.”
In conclusion, the Qu ‘ran is not only a fiction, it’s also a hoax.
Walter Sieruk says
One of the many topic regarding Islam on this video is the ploy that some Muslims use is the charge on anyone who seems suspicious of them is making the charge of “racial profiling” against him or her.
This is absurd , because Islam is not a race but a religious ‘political / Sharia system that has complete tyrannical control over the beliefs , ideas ,values and behavior of millions of people around the world.
Relating to to topic , before I retired I’m a senior citizen I had ,for a time ,in the past worked in security and some Muslims who seemed a bit suspicious of caught on quick that I was watching them and then one of them ask “We want to know , do you have a problem with us ? So I answered honesty “We under yellow alert.” At that the Muslim who asked that question pointed his finger at me and said “you have committed racial profiling that is illegal ”
Well in reality I had maybe committed “religious profiling ” but not the other .for a already exampled Islam is not a race..
In fact at the gym that i had gone to at that time I another gym member at that place was a Muslim, a White Muslim, who has converted from Roman Catholicism to Islam . So at my station if he was there knowing his religion I would keep an eye on him also .
Getting back ti what actually happened at the most in reality I was guilty of was a politically incorrect “thought crime” So what ! Maybe he should have called the :”thought police” and have them take me to jail for a “politically incorrect thought”
Maybe America is becoming l, somewhat, like the nation in the novel “1984”
Deborah R. Evans says
Very insightful and informative as well as honest. Thank you.