Is Amira Khawasak some kind of “Islamophobe”? I’ve been pointing out for years that these groups and others have a common belief system and ideology, and have only gotten abuse, ostracism and deplatforming for doing so. So expect the civilized world to shun Amira Khawasak in the same way, but don’t hold your breath. Everyone really knows she’s right.
“Egyptian Writer Following Killing Of ISIS Operative Who Was Nephew Of Hamas Leader Yahya Al-Sinwar: There Is No Difference Between ISIS, Hamas And Muslim Brotherhood,” MEMRI, April 4, 2022:
On March 26, 2022, the Saudi Al-Arabiya television channel reported, citing Egyptian sources, that the Egyptian armed forces and the Sinai Tribes Union had thwarted an attempt by several ISIS operatives to infiltrate Sinai from Gaza, killing three of the operatives and capturing three others. One of the operatives who was killed was identified as Mus’ab Mutawa’, aka Abu Jamil Al-Ghazzawi. He is the son of Jamil Mutawa’, who is in charge of Hamas’ charity foundations in Khan Younis, and Jamila Al-Sinwar, sister of Yahya Al-Sinwar, the head of Hamas’ political bureau in Gaza.[1] Mus’ab Mutawa’ was formerly a commander in Hamas’ military wing, but two years ago it was reported that he had joined ISIS in Sinai. [2]
Following the report of his killing, Egyptian journalist Amira Khawasek published an article in the daily Al-Yawm Al-Sabi’, in which she mentioned other terrorist attacks against Egypt that some Egyptian elements had attributed to Hamas. She stated that Mus’ab Mutawa’s ties to both Hamas and ISIS prove that “ISIS, Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) are equal in their depravity and crimes, and do not differ in any way.”
The following are translated excerpts from her article:[3]
“Last Friday [March 25, 2022], while the Egyptians rallied around their national [soccer] team to root for it in the match between Egypt and Senegal, an ISIS operative penetrated the Egyptian border into Sinai. He was counting on the obsolete belief [which claims] that there are occasions on which everyone is preoccupied and distracted, for example during the iftar [the meal breaking the daily fast] on Ramadan or when our [soccer] team has an important match… But, to [his] surprise, the heroic Egyptian army was watchful and alert… and, although most Egyptians were [indeed] busy watching the important match, the terrorist did not manage to infiltrate [Sinai] and was killed….
“As mentioned, the [recent] terrorist plot was thwarted and the dangerous operative, Mus’ab Mutawa’, was killed trying to join other operatives who were hiding like mice in their holes….
“The third surprise was that the terrorist [Mutawa’] was the son of Jamil Mutawa’, an official in Hamas’ charity [foundations] who is in charge of collecting donations and alms in Khan Younis, and the nephew of Yahya Al-Sinwar, the leader of the Hamas movement and the head of its political bureau in Gaza. This proves that ISIS, Hamas and the MB are equal in their depravity and crimes, and do not differ in any way. In fact, they constitute a single entity, even if they have different names. [I say this] to those who repeatedly claim that ISIS is different from the MB and Hamas. The truth is that they are all filthy criminals and murderers who spill innocent blood…”
gravenimage says
Nephew of Hamas top dog joins ISIS, Egyptian writer says no difference between ISIS, Hamas, and Muslim Brotherhood
…………
But don’t we always hear that Hamas is all about “Palestinian liberation”, and has nothing to do with Islam? Of course, this violence against Israel has always been a Jihad.
Adaptively Emergent says
Critical Theory based ‘ostrich syndrome’ is what I call it. Having your ‘societal head’ burried in the sand will only make matters far worse in the long run. Basing policy around a false wishful and vindictive narrative while relying on ‘the social construction of truth’ as a basis for decision making can only lead to eternal darkness.
Keith O says
A breath of fresh air and truth from this woman.
I wonder how long it will be before she is raped and murdered by those peace loving mudslimes she wrote about?
OLD GUY says
ISIS, HAMAS and The Muslim Brotherhood are the same, what a surprise.
Walter Sieruk says
That Egyptian writer has a good valid and true statement that “There’s no difference between Hamas, ISIS and the Muslim Brotherhood.
For the Muslims members of those organizations all believe in the same deity, Allah the god of Islam
Therefore is should be make clear that God of the Bible is not really Allah the god of Islam. To explain, through the passing of time it has become widely accepted that the word “Allah” is just the Arabic word for God. This started when truth compromising Bible “translators” substituted the word Allah where the word God should have had been uses in the Arabic translation of the Bible.
Furthermore, in the glossary in the book ASSASSINS! By Dr. Haha Lung it defines Allah as the “Pre-Islamic Lunar god : the god of Islam. “
Likewise, in the book entitled INSIDE ISLAM by a former Muslim who is now a Christian, Reza F. Safa on pages 22, 23 it reads “In pre-Islamic times both Allah –worship and Baal-worship involved the worship of the sun, the moon and the stars which h defines them as astral religions. [Which are condemned in the Bible, Second Kings 23:5] The crescent moon, which was the symbol of moon worship, is also the symbol of Islam.” In conclusion the Islamic god, Allah, is not the God of the Bible.
The words in brackets are my own. In addition other some other books that expose this little known truths are WHO IS THIS ALLAH ? by G..J.O.. Moshay also UNVEILING ISLAM by Ergun Mehmet Caner and Emir Fethi Caner and THE ISLAMIC INVASION by Robert Morey . There is also PHILISTINE by Ramon Bennett and ANSWERING JIHAD by Mabeel Qureshi
Walter Sieruk says
An Egyptian author wrote the truth that he stated “There’s no difference between Hamas ,ISIS and the Muslim Brotherhood since the members of all three entities believe in that Qu’ ran the is perfect infallible error free word of their god ,Allah
This leads to very important question: “Is the Qu ‘ran the Word of God or is it a fabrication of a man. Thus, is the Qu ‘ran the truth or a fiction and a hoax ?”
The answer is clearly given on pages 145 through 157 in THE ISLAMIC INVASION by Robert Morey in which he wrote a section on the Qu‘ran with its self-contradictions. Just two of the many he cited are the following “The Qu’ran differs on whether a day is a thousand years or fifty thousand years in God’s sight’ and “Who was first to believe? Abraham or Moses [Sura 6:14 versus 7:143]? The above is inconsistent and illogical. Further, Morey wrote about “The fact that Judaism and Christianity broke up into different sects was used in the Qu ‘ran to prove that they are not of God [Suras 30:20-32. 42:13, 14]. Yet Islam has broken up into many warring sects and therefore cannot be true if the Quran is right.”
Moreover, Morey in his book shows many more contradictions and absurdities in the Qu ‘ran, there are and how Muhammad incorporated extra Biblical and Jewish folklore along with pre-Islamic Arabian myth and parts of Zoroastrian and Hindu stories into the Qu ‘ran.
Furthermore, the Muslims claim that “the Qu ran is the direct, literal word of God unmodified in any way by the Prophet who uttered them at the bidding of God.” In addition , in the book UNVEILING ISLAM by Ergun Mehmet Caner and Eethi Caner has shown that the Qu ‘ran was modified in the following account on pages 45. “Muhammad felt the need to improve on the words of Allah, since he changed Allah’s wisdom for his own on several occasions. A hadith tells of the nonchalant emendations of Muhammad:’ On a number of occasions he [a scribe] had, with the Prophet’s consent changed the closing words of verses. For example, when the prophet had said ‘God is mighty and wise ‘ Adbollah b. Abi Sarh suggested writing down ‘Knowing and wise’ and the Prophet answered that there was no objection. Having observed a succession of changes of this type, Adbollah renounced Islam on the grounds that revelations, if from God could not be changed at the prompting of a scribe such as himself. After his apostasy he went to Mecca and joined the Qorayshites.’ Other writers reveal that later Muhammad and his people did go war with the Qorayshites and he personally killed Abdollah. Obviously Abdollah knew too much and Muhammad wanted Abdollah’s knowledge to die with him.”
In conclusion, the Qu ‘ran is not only a fiction, it’s also a hoax.
Even though the above essay was posted before, it should now be added that the last statement of the above that “the Qu ‘ran is not only a fiction, it’s also a hoax.” To put this in a Biblical way. As in from the Bible, it may be truly explained that the Qu ‘ran is a deceptive work of “the cunning and craftiness of men in their deceitful scheming.” Ephesians 14:12.. [N.I.V.]