“We’ve got to take common-sense approaches towards controlling gun ownership.”Fri Apr 22, 2022
Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is an investigative journalist and writer focusing on the radical Left and Islamic terrorism.
“How many more times are we going to watch this on the news? How many times are we going to read about it and say, ‘Oh we can’t do nothing to stop it?’” House Minority Leader Todd Rutherford demanded three years ago while pushing for gun control. “It’s time that we do all that we can to protect our children, to protect the lives of other people’s children, to protect the lives of people that simply want to go to Wal-Mart and go back-to-school shopping.”
Now, acting as the lawyer for Jewayne Price, the suspect in the Columbiana Centre mall shooting in which 14 people, as young as 15 and as old as 73, were injured, the South Carolina Democrat watched as his client was released with an ankle monitor so he can go back to work.
All that we can do to protect our children involves banning guns while freeing criminals.
“We’ve got to take common-sense approaches towards controlling gun ownership to make sure bad people don’t get guns,” Rutherford has insisted.
Except when those bad people are his clients.
“I need the students of South Carolina to know that we are paying attention and that ‘never again’ actually means something in South Carolina,” Rutherford had argued during a previous gun control proposal. I’m sure that the 15-year-old injured in this attack is happy to hear that.
As are the children he wanted to condemn to death when he led a walkout to protest the fetal heartbeat bill, putting the abortion lobby ahead of the lives of babies.
Never again, to Rutherford, means banning AR-15s and freeing criminals from prison.
Rutherford’s involvement hammers home the paradox of Democrat politicians who believe that guns need to be controlled and criminals don’t. Their efforts have unleashed an unprecedented wave of shootings in major cities even while they clamor for more gun bans that don’t work.
Instead of criminalizing guns, we need to criminalize criminals.
Murder are up 51% in South Carolina in the last 5 years.
Why might that be? The disastrous Omnibus Crime Reduction and Sentencing Reform Act of 2010, backed by Democrats and far too many Republicans, led to the closure of six prisons and cut the prison population by thousands of criminals. The prison population has declined from 24,000 a decade ago to less than 19,000. The projected population, accounting for demographics, should have been close to 30,000. That’s a difference of around 10,000.
What happens when a third of the prison population is roaming around South Carolina?
Murder rates are the highest they’ve been since 1993. In the 90s, growing crime rates were rolled back by locking up criminals with a clear turnaround kicking in by the end of the decade so that despite significant population growth in the new century, murders fell sharply and so did most other crimes. The same prison system that Rutherford decries and that pro-crime South Carolina politicians helped dismantle had done its job. Now that job has been undone.
If Rutherford really cares about protecting children, he would fight to lock up criminals. Instead, not just as a lawyer, but as a legislator, he has battled to keep criminals out of prison. And he has blamed anything and everything for shootings except the criminals carrying them out.
Rutherford, who had previously opposed attempts to keep Drag Queen Story Hour out of children’s libraries, also blamed FOX News for shootings, claiming, “these networks that broadcast what they call news, but it’s not. It’s really hate speech and coded language.”
FOX News doesn’t kill people. Neither do inanimate objects. Criminals kill people.
Rutherford previously blamed the NRA and gun owners for making it too difficult to pass gun control legislation, but the latest mass shooting isn’t a call for gun control, but criminal control.
Controlling criminals is a much more just solution than gun control which means controlling everyone. And yet given a choice between controlling criminals and everyone, Democrats like Rutherford invariably choose to restrict everyone’s rights instead of restricting criminals.
But if they can’t even control criminals, how do they hope to control everyone?
The politician and lawyer has addressed anti-police rallies and represented the family of a teen shot by police while advocating for police defunding.He pushed a bill to ban law enforcement from using automatic license plate readers, but proposes “controlling gun ownership”.
Rep. Rutherford’s House Bill 3322 would, in its original form, have released kidnappers, robbers, and killers while wiping out mandatory minimums.
None of this is a “common sense” approach to crime.
Rutherford has fought for mask mandates in schools, denouncing Gov. McMaster for proposing to protect people “without forcing them to do things that they do not want to do.”
The House Dem leader supports governments forcing people to do things when it comes to COVID or gun ownership, but not when it comes to murder, robbery, and drugs.
People not wearing masks are not a threat. A firearm is not a threat. A criminal however is.
The Columbiana Centre mall shooting shows how crime has begun to affect the state’s capital.
Police Chief Skip Holbrook has been reported as saying that around four percent of the population are committing 80 percent of the violent crimes in the city. That’s as true of Columbia, as it is of most major cities. A small population of career criminals and gang members is committing most of the crimes. When that population is locked up and closely monitored, public safety dramatically improves, and when they’re set free, they rob, stab, shoot, and kill at will.
“When you have a country in which you have more firearms on our streets than you actually have people, we got a problem,” Columbia Mayor Steve Benjamin whined. “We need more help from the State Legislature, we need more help from the national government, the federal government, and we need more help from each and every one of our citizens doing our share.”
Benjamin, like Rutherford, is wrong. The number of guns isn’t the problem, the number of criminals is. When Democrats free criminals and lock up guns, everyone lives in terror.
The Columbiana Centre mall shooting is just the latest reminder of that simple reality.
The way back begins with reversing South Carolina’s disastrous pro-crime measures which were enacted with “guidance” from left-wing and libertarian pro-crime groups that cut prison populations while growing the size of the criminal population roaming the streets.
Politicians boasted of saving hundreds of millions of dollars by closing prisons. Now as crime rates soar, the money gained has been lost ten times over.
And we can’t even begin to put a price on the loss of human life.
House Minority Leader Todd Rutherford is right. “It’s time that we do all that we can to protect our children, to protect the lives of other people’s children, to protect the lives of people that simply want to go to Wal-Mart and go back-to-school shopping.”
Mall shooters shouldn’t be roaming the streets. We can protect our children from them.
All we have to do is lock them up.
gravenimage says
Gun Control Dem Helps Free Alleged Mall Shooter
………
How can you release someone with an ankle monitor who randomly *shot 14 people at a mall*? Absolute madness.
And this is not just on his appalling lawyer, but also on the clueless judge.
Even more bizarre, Rutherford claimed that Jewayne Price shot “in self defense”. Even with multiple shooters–as it appears there were–his shooting over a dozen innocent bystanders including children and the aged is proof that he can’t be trusted out on the street.
Wellington says
The Democratic Party, gravenimage, as I have been averring for many years now, is beyond reformation, beyond redemption, and which is why, even with primaries in mind in the hope to elect more “moderate” Democrats, it is as much of a fool’s errand as counting on moderate Muslims to reform Islam.
Just as Islam is hopeless in its entirety, so has the Democratic Party of the USA entered into a realm of no possible redemption. And which is why everyone of sense and knowledge who still remain Democrat must leave the Democratic Party once and for all, just as any reform-minded Muslims with good intentions (though always confused nonetheless) must give up on Islam in its entirety.
Yes, this comparison is apt. You betcha’. And massive defection from the putrid Democratic Party would go a long way to destroying the Democratic Party, just as so-called moderate Muslims finally giving up on Islam would do the same with that warped belief system.
gravenimage says
Sadly true, Wellington.
Keith O says
This is pathetic.
When, not if, this scumbag commits another crime, then anyone who was complicit in his release should also be charged and thrown into a cell next to the offender.
There is a reason why these bastards want the law abiding population disarmed, it then paves the road to a complete take over by the federal government.
This is the only reason that the second amendment was written. Americans had just gone through a war with a despot,(the king of England) and the founding fathers knew that an armed population is the only thing keeping a government in check.
WhyNot says
So, if the Jan 6ers had been armed ….. they would all be out on bail by now … Right?
The ONLY “common sense” gun ownership is that if you are a Citizen of one of the Sovereign States, several, or, you are a citizen of The United States …. then you have the RIGHT to have a firearm.
If you are a “felon” that has been released from confinement and has had your citizenship restored (remember. a citizen cannot be confined against his will), this includes you.
Huapakechi says
Has anyone questioned why control is the key word in the great majority of democrat talking points? What have they accomplished since the imposition of the biden administration? Disaster.
OLD GUY says
Hey it was the GUN that shot all these people, he was just pulling the trigger. Can’t be hie responsibility.
Beneath the Veil of Consciousness says
He’s going back to work? Who’s hiring him? Are there financial incentives for employing violent criminals? Why?