Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Palestinian Islamic ‘Scholar’ Blames Europeans For Everything, Including Sex With Animals

By

That indispensable source of information on Muslim lands and peoples, MEMRI, has just carried a report on a speech given by Yousef Makharzah, a Palestinian Islamic scholar, in which he accuses the Europeans of every conceivable atrocity, including having “sex with animals and beasts more than with humans.” MEMRI’s report is here: “Palestinian Islamic Scholar Yousef Makharzah: Europeans Practice Bestiality, Sleep With Animals More Than With Humans; Western Civilization Is Inferior, Asinine, Racist,” MEMRI, March 6, 2022:

Palestinian Islamic scholar Yousef Makharzah said in a March 6, 2022 speech that aired on the Hizb-ut-Tahrir-affiliated Al-Waqiyah TV (Lebanon) that Syrian refugees were driven to Europe by “oppressive Europeans” and that the Europeans are the cause of the Muslims’ tragedies. Makharzah claimed that Europeans practice bestiality to the extent that “they have sex with animals and beasts more than with humans.” He also said that that Western civilization is inferior, asinine, and racist, and that it causes “a man to oppress his brother and kill him with no justification.” In addition, Makharzah asserted that when European colonialist came to Muslim countries, they made the Muslims “more ignorant and shallow” so they would purchase the European consumer goods. For more about Sheikh Makharzah, see MEMRI TV Clips No. 7849, No. 8500, No. 8557, No. 8877, No. 9207, No. 9356 and No. 9411.

Yousef Makharzah: “Why did the Syrians flee to Europe? They were driven there by the oppressive Europeans. Why did the people of the poor countries in Africa flee to Europe?

“They were driven there by the injustice of colonialism that devoured the wealth of those countries. The [Europeans] are the cause of our tragedies.

The 6.7 million Syrians who fled the 11-year-old Syrian civil war were driven to do so to avoid the unending violence of the war, and especially the repeated attacks, by Assad’s army, on  civilians. Europeans had nothing to with those atrocities.  The refugees were Syrians fleeing other Syrians. Why would the Europeans have “driven” Syrians to Europe, where they are not wanted, and where they constitute a terrific drain on the economies of the generous welfare states of Europe, that provide those Syrian refugees who do arrive with free housing, medical care, education, and family allowances. Fortunately, of the 6.7 million Syrian refugees, 5.6 million remain in the Middle East, in Turkey, Lebanon, Jordan, and Iraq. Only In the crazed imagination of Yousef Makharzah are Europeans “driving” Syrians to Europe.

They brought cattle and beasts into their bedrooms. They have sex with animals and beasts more than with humans.

“Sex with animals”? The only religion whose clerics have solemnly considered sex with animals, and has carefully set out the “rules” that should govern such sex, is Islam. It was that most learned of Shi’a theologians, Ayatollah Khomeini himself, who set out the dating Do’s-N’-Don’ts for Muslims having sex with sheep, cows, camels. Here is what he wrote in his “Tahrirolvasyleh,” fourth volume, 1990:

A man can have sex with animals such as sheep, cows, camels and so on. However, he should kill the animal after he has his orgasm. He should not sell the meat to the people in his own village, but selling the meat to a neighboring village is reasonable.

Good to know, because otherwise you might commit the unpardonable faux pas of serving the meat of a camel — or of a cow, or of a sheep — you have just sodomized, to people of your own village, and that, as Ayatollah Khomeini reminds us, would never do.

Yousef Makharzah continues:

This filthy civilization that is invading us is the Western civilization. Our leaders and our intellectuals were enticed by this bestial civilization. It is an inferior, asinine, and racist civilization, that causes a man to oppress his brother and kill him with no justification.

The civilization of the advanced West fills so many Muslims with wonder and envy, as it is so obviously superior to that of the Muslims, and this sends the troglodytic Makharzah into a fury. He knows – the Qur’an tells him so – that Muslims are the “best of peoples”(3:110) while the Infidels are “the most vile of created beings.”(98:6) Therefore he insists, though without any evidence, that Western civilization must be “inferior, asinine, and racist.” If it is “inferior,” why have tens of millions of Muslims flooded into the countries of the West, with millions more trying desperately to enter in order to settle deep within that “inferior, asinine, and racist” civilization? And why is that pull felt most keenly among Muslim “leaders and intellectuals,” who presumably have the best opportunity to study and compare the Muslim and the non-Muslim worlds? Could it be because they find that civilization not at all “inferior, asinine, and racist,” but in every respect superior to the Islamic civilization that they with great difficulty are tasked with defending?

When they came to our country, they made us more ignorant and shallow, so that we could become a consumer market for their industry. Through their Muslim leaders-for-hire, they prevented us from innovating. They prevented us from [developing] industry and improving our lives.

So the explanation for Muslim backwardness has nothing to do with Islam; it is the result of a deliberate plot by those who “came to our country” (dar al-Islam) to make us “more ignorant and shallow.” Goodness, how weak Muslims must be, to be used in such a manner. The European reentry into the modern Middle East began with Napoleon’s invasion of Egypt in 1798, but the Middle East and North Africa would remain under the rule by fellow Muslims, Ottoman Turks, for at least another century. And for more than 75 years, no Muslim land has been under non-Muslim — European — rule. Yet Muslims such as Yousef Makharzah must blame the Europeans for all that has gone wrong in their wretched, backward lands.

How did those Europeans make Muslims “more ignorant and shallow”? The French remained in both Morocco and Tunisia for a very short period, about 40 years; only in Algeria did the French have a full-fledged colony, with a large transfer of French colons, that lasted from 1830 to 1962. The Italians held Libya only from 1911 to 1940. All over North Africa, even in that short time, the Europeans did much good. They built the first modern school systems, to replace the madrasahs. They allowed girls to go to school. They built the first universities. They modernized agricultural production. They built hospitals and clinics; as a result, infant mortality plummeted and life expectancy lengthened. They built roads, bridges, ports. They did not make Muslims “more ignorant and shallow.” The Europeans did more to educate the Arabs who were under their rule in North Africa than had been done by the Ottomans during more than 600 years of rule.

In the Middle East, the Europeans — Britain and France — were present not as colonists, but as holders of League of Nations’ Mandates. Britain held those for Iraq, and Palestine, and having sealed it off from Mandatory Palestine, for Jordan as well. The British helped to set up the Hashemite monarchies in Iraq and Jordan, and provided arms and training to their armies, but little else. The French, who held the Mandate for Syria and Lebanon, did a great deal to set up a system of secular schools and, as part of its mission civilisatrie (“civilizig mission”), introduced French-language schools for the Lebanese elite, for whom French became more popular than Arabic, for it was the second language of the enlightened West.

If most Muslims remained “more ignorant and shallow,” this was not because of the Europeans, but because Islam itself encouraged submission to authority, and discouraged, even punished, skeptical inquiry. This habit of mental submission kept people “more ignorant” as they rejected, for example, new scientific theories, and the True Believers clung to the belief that all knowledge could be found in the Qur’an, which dampened any desire to learn more..

Yousef Makharzah claims that “through their Muslim leaders-for-hire, they prevented us from innovating.” There are several things wrong with this claim. What “Muslim leaders for hire” were there? Not Hafez nor his son Bashar Assad, the Syrian despots who despise the West. Not Gamal Abdel Nasser, nor Saddam Hussein, dictators who embodied anti-Western pan-Arabism. None of the rich Sunni Gulf states, such as Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Kuwait, Qatar, and Kuwait, were “Muslim leaders-for-hire”: it was they who paid, and still pay, Western politicians and P.R. firms to do their bidding in the capitals of the Western world.

It was never the West that “prevented us [the Muslims] from innovating.” It is Islam itself that warns Muslims of the dangers of innovation, or bida. Innovation in any aspect of life is a danger for Muslims, because it might lead Believers to want to “innovate” in matters of faith, even perhaps seeking changes in the tenets and teachings of Islam, iand that would never do.

Yousef Makharzah has made wild charges about the West that do not withstand scrutiny. He rants against “this filthy civilization that is invading us is the Western civilization. Our leaders and our intellectuals were enticed by this bestial civilization. It is an inferior, asinine, and racist civilization, that causes a man to oppress his brother and kill him with no justification.” In what respect is Western civilization inferior to that of the Muslims? In its scientific achievements, in its political framework, in its art, its music, its literature, its philosophy? In its equal treatment of men and women, and of people of all religions, and of no religion? In what way are Western states “inferior” to such states of high Muslim civilization as Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Kuwait, Qatar, Syria, Egypt, Libya, Algeria?

As to the charge that Yousef Makharzah makes against our “filthy civilization that is invading us [the Muslim lands]” – to repeat, we are not invading you. You are invading us. Tens of millions of Muslims have already settled in Europe, deep behind what they are taught to regard as enemy lands. Please, we don’t want you here, please go home, back to your wonderful Muslim countries, instead of remaining in our “inferior, asinine, and racist civilization,” where a “man will kill his brother with no justification,” so very unlike what happens in the peaceable kingdoms of Syria, Libya, Lebanon, Yemen, Afghanistan, and so very many more.

Comments

  1. These inbred perverts point a finger at the West. What a laugh. What to say other than the idiot “scholar” couldn’t possibly pass a fifth-grade class in any civilized country.

    • Sex With Animal in ISLAM is approved.

      https://radicalmuslims.wordpress.com/2017/09/28/sex-with-animal-in-islam/

      – al-Uzma Seyyid Ali al-Sistani(Sex with animals Fatwa )
      “Sex with animals (نكاح الحيوانات ) before the mission (Islam) was wide spread and many narrations are narrated that it is halal but makrooh (disliked). And on the compulsory precaution one should abandon this practice that may cause self harm. And you must admit this to the owner of the sheep and pay the owner.
      ” [ http://www.wikiislam.net/wiki/File:Sistani-fatwa.jpg ][ Allamah Hassan bin Mansoor Qadhi Khan, Fatawa Qadhi Khan, Page 820 ]
      The Arabs have never taken quite so condemnatory attitude towards the practice of bestality, and indeed a popular Arab saying that “The pilgrimage to Mecca is not complete without copulating with the camel.”[Robert E.L. Masters – Forbidden Sexual Behavior and Morality – The Julian Press, 1st edition 1966,]

      – Abu Bakar al-Kashani (d. 587 H), Badaye al-Sanae, Vol. 2, p. 216″ ولو وطئ بهيمة لا يفسد حجه ” “If he had sexual intercourse with an animal, that will not make his hajj void”
      – Allamah Hassan bin Mansoor Qadhi Khan, Fatawa Qadhi Khan, Page 820
      “Sex with animals, dead people and masturbation, does not invalidate one’s fast provided ejaculation does not occur”
      – Abu Dawud Book 38, Number 4450:Narrated Abdullah ibn Abbas:”There is no prescribed punishment for one who has sexual intercourse with an animal.”As you see in this hadith if the action of having sex with animal is forbidden then why there is not any prescribed punishment for this forbiden action?According to Judith Worell (PhD, a clinical psychologist and Professor Emerita at the University of Kentucky in Lexington winner of Gold Medal Awards by The American Psychological Foundation (APF) recognize distinguished and enduring records of accomplishment in four areas of psychology ) :”the permissibility of bestiality seems to have been left open to ‘interpretation.’”[ Encyclopedia of women and gender: Volume 1 (p. 298) – Academic Press; 1 edition, September 27, 2001, ISBN 9780122272455 ]

      According to Ayatullah al Uzma Khomeini’s book , “Tahrirolvasyleh” fourth volume, Darol Elm, Gom, Iran, 1990 :
      23 :
      الحيوان الموطوء إن كان مما يراد أكله كالشاة و البقرة و الناقة يجب أن يذبح ثم يحرق و يغرم الواطئ قيمته لمالكه إن كان غير المالك ، و إن كان مما يراد ظهره حملا أو ركوبا و ليس يعتاد أكله كالحمار و البغل و الفرس أخرج من المحل الذي فعل به إلى بلد آخر فيباع فيه ، فيعطى ثمنه للواطئ ، و يغرم قيمته إن كان غير المالك .
      Issue 23 – The animal which has had intimate intercourse done upon it, if it of (a type) that one wants to eat, like a sheep, and a cow, and a she-camel, then it is wajib to slaughter it then burn it, and the doer of the intimate act is fined its value toits owner if he was not the owner. And if it is of (a type) that one wants to (use) its back to carry (i.e. a beast of burden) or to ride, and its eating is not customary, like the donkey and the mule and the horse, it is taken out of spot in which it was done to another balad (country?) and sold in it. So its price is given for (? Unsure) the doer of the intimate act and he is fined its value if he was not the owner.
      In simple word:”A man can have sex with animals such as sheep, cows, camels and so on. However, he should kill the animal after he has his orgasm. He should not sell the meat to the people in his own village; but, selling the meat to the next door village should be fine.”

  2. Bestiality is a capital offense in the Bible. The Islamic scholar should read it in Leviticus 18:22-30, 20:15-16, Deuteronomy 27:21-22, Exodus 22:19-20 before commenting.
    Persons who desecrate the sanctity of marriage and gender roles and defile themselves with bestiality are obviously fakes. Anyone can claim they are Christian, Superman, Batman, can fly, but a little commonsense would tell any observer that their lifestyle does not correlate with the claim.

    Regarding bestiality and Islam:
    “The only religion whose clerics have solemnly considered sex with animals, and has carefully set out the “rules” that should govern such sex, is Islam. It was that most learned of Shi’a theologians, Ayatollah Khomeini himself, who set out the dating Do’s-N’-Don’ts for Muslims having sex with sheep, cows, camels. Here is what he wrote in his “Tahrirolvasyleh,” fourth volume, 1990:”

    Any rational Muslim would run screaming and jumping out of Islam by now.

    • Poor CAMELS and Sheep, how disgusting and they call it a religion. Then you can throw in sex with 6 yr olds and you have the true meaning of a religion. Or how about rape of women who are not islamic. And don’t forget wife beatings and honor killings of family members. Islam is not a religion it is a murderous cult.

  3. Bestiality is a capital offense in the Bible. The Islamic “scholar” should read it in Leviticus 18:22-30, 20:15-16, Deuteronomy 27:21-22, Exodus 22:19-20 before commenting.
    Persons who desecrate the sanctity of marriage and gender roles and defile themselves with bestiality are obviously fakes. Anyone can claim they are Christian, Superman, Batman, can fly, but a little commonsense would tell any observer that their lifestyle does not correlate with the claim.

    Regarding bestiality and Islam:
    “The only religion whose clerics have solemnly considered sex with animals, and has carefully set out the “rules” that should govern such sex, is Islam. It was that most learned of Shi’a theologians, Ayatollah Khomeini himself, who set out the dating Do’s-N’-Don’ts for Muslims having sex with sheep, cows, camels. Here is what he wrote in his “Tahrirolvasyleh,” fourth volume, 1990:”

    Any rational Muslim would run screaming and jumping out of Islam by now.

  4. “islamic scholars”…know one thing, but lie about it. “islamic scholars” know islam, and nothing else. all of their “knowledge” is garbage, feculent filth and straight from satan the devil.

  5. In India, animals, especially cattle, are raped exclusively by muslims. I’m guessing that the Europeans, who are nowhere near, are responsible for that as well?

  6. Betcha Arabs/Muslims were committing Acts of Bestiality with camels, donkeys, sheep, goats etc. long before some Europeans were..
    Strange though, this “far superior” “Culture has not really invented anything. Yet, they grab anything that is “Kuffar”.
    i can recall some 50years ago talking to ex-Servicemen who were in the North African Campaign of WW2 & they’d talk about the Arabs. One of the most repeated phrases they’d tell me was: “The best F*ck is when you do a camel, the second best is a young boy & if you can’t get either, then you’ll have to f*ck a woman.”

    On youtube,, if they’re still on please watch: something titled – Algerian Author destroys Islam; Al-Jazera, 2009; or Anwar Malik, al-Jazera, 2009.
    In these trying & dangerous Times, in the SearchBox, type in: IRAQI TV DEBATE – Is the Earth Flat? BOTH are qualified Astronomers, but only one is correct.

  8. We prevented them from innovating what, making more bad excuses 🙂 He sounds like a broken record and I doubt he even believes is own foolishness. The Left though is another matter entirely. Maybe they should join forces and invent new ways of stealing other peoples money and property… wait what… oh they have already… I see…

  9. The only important prerequisite for becoming a Muslim scholar is brain damage.

  10. Every claim by Yousef Makharzah is a justification for Palestinian failure and he offers nothing to inspire or motivate success.

    Why do Muslims countenance a “scholar” who is telling them they are failures because of other nations? Doesn’t this rhyme with Hitler’s claims about the Allies after WWI? Is Makharzah stirring up anger for the next intifada?

  11. “When they came to our country, they made us more ignorant and shallow…”

    Impossible.

  12. Oh, another moronic, know nothing islamic “scholar”. I think all that these fuckwits have to do is grow a very long beard and Muslims think the fools are “scholars”. Islam has to be the most degenerate, evil religious ideology that still is polluting the human race, so this “scholar” and his imbecilic views about the western world are way off the mark. It is degenerate islam that causes the backward, primitive lives of Muslims to be the way they are. Trying to live the way 7th century Arabs lived is bound to hold back any human beings from achieving anything worthwhile or of having a civilised life. islam is a completely destructive way of living life and its hate filled attitude towards non-Muslims makes it a constant danger to all non-Muslims.

  13. Palestinian Islamic ‘Scholar’ Blames Europeans For Everything, Including Sex With Animals
    …………………

    This is hilarious given that bestiality is illegal in the civilized world, but sacralized by Muslim scholars like the Ayatollah Khomeini in his “Little Green Book”. Then, the country with the largest number of online searches for bestiality is Islamic Pakistan, despite them having fewer computers and less internet access than the civilized world.

    Note that he thinks that having pets means sex with animals. Of course, a pious Muslim thug cannot conceive of pets as companions, but assumes that they are kept as sex slaves. Needless to say this says more about the perverse Yousef Makharzah than it does about Western pet owners who let their dogs and cats curl up in bed. (Our cats curl up with us most nights–no bestiality involved).

    Then, the idea that Muslims have to flee to Europe because the Europeans have somehow forced them to is ludicrous. These countries were ruined by Islam, not colonialism.

    And why is he using a microphone if he hates Western civ?

    And how did the West prevent Muslims from innovating? Doesn’t this Islamic “scholar” know that Islam itself condemns “Bi’da” (“innovation”)?

    What a tool.

    Fine analysis from Hugh Fitzgerald.

    • It might be the pot calling the kettle black, but actually is more like the goat calling the camel promiscuous.

  14. Every sin and every suffering of any muslim is the fault of the devil or the infidels. That is how pious muslims think and sometimes they say it openly.

  15. Palestinians don’t complain about all the millions of euro,s that’s freely given to them from Europe .
    They claim they have nothing, and yet the number of new housing estates all over Gaza that are empty as the owners are working overseas in Europe. Why are they constantly complaining that they have no accommodation. Europe are being taken for a ride as these people are constantly saying they have nothing and are very poor. Free money coming from Europe must stop now.
    The same people are very well off and most of the European,s free money goes to terrorists .
    I am sure it’s wiser to choose what you say, than to say what you choose .
    Take the plank from your own eye before you try to take the spec from others.
    Please note that your own people are so unrighteous, so it may be wise to try and change their sinfulness.

  16. If Robert and our comments section can’t laugh Islam out of existence, I don’t know what can.

Discover more from

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Skip to content