Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

UN official denounces planned UK legislation against illegal immigration, tells UK to leave borders open

By

The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR)  representative to the UK, Rossella Pagliuchi-Lor, is urging British politicians to consider keeping their borders open, and she “criticised pending government legislation against illegal immigration.”

Last year, the Boris Johnson government committed to the UN Migration Pact, recognizing mass migration as a “human right.” In fact, the UK has been repeatedly demonstrating its commitment to open borders, despite the string of lies it has been telling its own people. Pagliuchi-Lor’s plea to the UK is therefore essentially redundant.

As reported by Jihad Watch last year, when the Boris Johnson government committed to the UN Migration Pact:

A major survey found that the UK public voted for Brexit because of the EU’s reckless immigration policy. But that has not deterred British Prime Minister Boris Johnson from allowing in huge numbers of illegal migrants via the English Channel. Brexit party leader Nigel Farage has never let up on his justified criticism of the Johnson government, branding the daily recorded arrival of 416 migrants this past summer and fall as a “complete humiliation,” adding that “unless the Conservative government has the political will to pull out of the EU’s asylum regulations, the boats will keep coming.”

As predicted, the boats just kept coming in droves, and now Pagliuchi-Lor is pushing the UK to keep its doors open, which it would likely do anyway. The Johnson government, particularly Home Secretary Priti Patel, has continuously vowed its “unwavering determination” to stop the influx of illegals into the UK via the English Channel through various tough initiatives. Yet each such initiative has proven to be futile.

For years, the UK government has been pledging to “cut immigration,” evidently to assuage the growing frustration of its citizens. The latest pending legislation against illegal immigration doesn’t inspire any more confidence that it would be adhered to than its predecessors. Already the UK has decided to scrap passports for Afghans who are coming in, so the UK certainly needs no prodding by Pagliuchi-Lor. Afghan evacuees are now also demanding chain migration of extended families and colleagues.

“UN Official Denounces Planned UK Legislation Against Illegal Immigration,” by Jack Montgomery, Breitbart, September 17, 2021:

United Nations representative Rossella Pagliuchi-Lor has urged British politicians to “consider keeping your borders open” and criticised pending government legislation against illegal immigration.

Pagliuchi-Lor, who represents the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) — the UN Refugee Agency — in the United Kingdom, made the comments at a Home Affairs Select Committee evidence session titled ‘Afghanistan: safe routes and resettlement’, examining the situation in the South Asian country and related migration issues in the wake of the Taliban takeover there.

The select committee was warned of an “impending humanitarian catastrophe” in the newy-declared Islamic emirate by another contributor to the session — with Afghanistan having been “on life support” under the former Western regime, and the “extreme fragility of the economy” likely to be dealt a devastating blow by factors including drought and city-dwellers with no land losing their former salaries — and Pagliuchi-Lor did say the UNHCR had already noted an “uptick” in people leaving the country, if no “dramatic outflows” as yet.

She had a great deal of criticism for the upcoming Nationality and Borders Bill, which will supposedly toughen measures against illegal migrants and those who facilitate illegal migration, claiming to find it “a bit ironic to be honest, that the very same people we felt so affected by when we saw them hanging from planes in Kabul, or those we are now discussing how they should be extracted … if they extracted themselves and made it here, they would, if that bill were law, be liable to potentially four years in jail and then subject to some attempts to return them to some other countries.”…

Comments

  2. One thing I’ve noticed with these people who get to top positions: They lose ground contact overnight and get delusions of grandeur; start thinking they’re born an Aristocrat; have descended from Mt. Olympus; or even contain blue blood. An employee needs to hold them by the hand or they start floating upward. It would surprise me if the High Commissioner doesn’t live on some high hill overlooking a lake, a thousand miles from a no-go zone with a private jet at her disposal. If she pays taxes, she should be taxed in the UK to pay for all the Islamization, turmoil and expenses she wants to create there.

    Rossella Pagliuchi-Lor is purposely looking the other way from the built-in dangers of 1400 years of Islamic doctrine (Jihad, Taqiya, Jizya extortion, Female Genital Mutilation, et al) invented by an Arab in the 6th century for Arab Conquest. Instead of pushing non-Islamic host nations toward destabilization and civil war, she should be busy setting up express routes for peaceful repatriation or resettlement of illegal Muslim migrants to areas that are already infected with the Islamic pathogen. Islam is not compatible with infidel host nations and ends up killing the host.

  3. Why stop with the U.K? She is a high commissioner for the UNITED Nations. ALL the members of the UNITED Nations should be calling for ALL the nations which are members of the UNITED Nations to throw open their borders and accept anyone who wants to migrate freely across the world. Come to think of it why are there any borders at all? Why are there any nations? Members of the UNITED Nations should act in UNITY. Every single representative to every single member of the UNITED Nations should be calling for every country to open their borders. It should demand that not a single nation that is a member of the UNITED Nations be allowed to be a member of the UNITED Nations if that country is run by a degenerate bunch of RACISTS who think of their country as a nation. There is no greater crime than racism and if racism is allowed at the UNITED Nations then the UNITED Nations is nothing more than a UNITED bunch of nationalists and hypocrites and racists and …. yeah, racists (I can’t go any lower than that).

  4. “The days of hiding behind borders and fences are long gone…
    migrants are good for a community, economically and every other way.”

    “we … ourselves, who still nurse a sense of our homogeneity and difference from others…..
    “And that’s precisely what the European Union, in my view, should be doing its best to undermine.”

    — the late Peter Sutherland of the UN, Paid Migration Promoter

    https://gatesofvienna.net/2020/03/gate-crashers/
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-18519395

    • Here is Sutherland’s announcement about sovereignty:

      “states have to become more open states, in terms of the people who inhabit them”,
      “sovereignty is an illusion – … sovereignty is an absolute illusion that has to be put behind us.”

      Dangerous stuff.

  6. Notice who she is: A white woman. Lethal to the West. Don’t comment on me, I am irrelevant, comment on how women can actually welcome Islam. Probably for evolutionary reasons, as women did not go out and hunt, they are not equipped to ‘Identify Friend or Foe.’

    That does NOT mean I condone leftist men eager to submit to Islam. I am just shocked as to how WOMEN should welcome it.

    • I’d say I’m closer to your camp Otter, two key factors in war imo are biology and ideology. Women by Evolution are designed to be nurturers and caregivers. It is not in their nature to understand warfare or know how to fight.

      This is why female leaders in general (obviously not all, some can be ‘male-minded’ or warrior-like) are completely inept when it comes to recognizing Islam as a threat, just think of morons like Nancy Pelosi, H. Clinton, Jacinda Ardern (from New Zealand), etc. all of them bow and scrape to Islam and Muslims.

      They are unable to understand the idea of warfare to identify and then have to will to defeat a very dangerous enemy. They will seek out compromise and ‘peace’ meaning surrender in order to avoid warfare because it is not in their genes to consider ending their foes.

      I put weasley cowardly beta males in that category from both the left and right, but most of them are on the Left as we know.

      I realize most people want to believe that men and women are equal and I believe in rights they are…but not when it comes to understanding issues like conflict and battle.

      They really should be kept out of high level govt positions which may involve warfare…along with beta males like Biden, Macron and that dummy Stefan Löfven running Sweden today who sits by and does nothing while Muslims burn/bomb neighborhoods and rape women en mass.

      • Fitna, you obviously cannot explain leaders like Margaret Thatcher and Golda Meir–or, for that matter, Anti-Jihadists like Pamela Geller, Brigitte Gabriel, and Jihad Watch’s own Christine Douglas-Williams, nor all the other female Anti-Jihadists here. The idea that they are all masculine freaks of nature actually makes no sense.

        • Graven,

          How about you explain Rossella Pagliuchi-Lor and Jacinda Ardern first?

          It seems you never took a course in biology in your life or know the difference between males and females. Much to learn you have.

        • Also tell me how many Pam Gellers and Golda Meirs are out there? I just see one of each. Why are all your brave feminists warriors so quiet about FGM, female slaver, honor-killing,etc that we see committed by Muslim men?

          Suddenly they’re all so shy and timid like the weakly women they are. They’ll march about ‘mansplaining’ and pay-equity, because they know western men won’t attack them but Muslim men will.

          I’ll bet the vast majority of posters on anti-Islam sites are men, not women, geez ‘champion of females’ Graven, I wonder why that is?

        • Fitna, there are many dhimmi fools out there–they are not all white women like the witless Rossella Pagliuchi-Lor and Jacinda Ardern. There are male dhimmis and dhimmis of color. Right above poster David cites Peter Southerland, who was not female.

          And yes, I have taken courses in Biology–the idea that women are biologically incapable of recognizing Islam as a threat is not actually factual. There are biological differences between men and women, but this is not one of them.

          And it is true that there is only one Pamela Geller and Golda Meir–there is also just one Geert Wilders and Robert Spencer, also. I wish there were more like them, of either gender.

          I *wish* more women would speak out against FGM, Sex slavery, and “Honor Kilings”. Of course, I wish more men would, also. The fact is that many in the West, male and female, are in denial about the threat of Islam.

          Are dhimmi men biologically weak for not speaking out against these and other horrors of Islam, as well? I think this is more ideology than biology.

          And there are a great number of Anti-Jihad women on this site–not all of them have usernames that specifically identify them as female–that is the case with myself. In fact, at least three of the posters on this thread are female that I know of, but only one uses a username that identifies her as such. Should I have to identify myself as “Ms. gravenimage”? I assume you are male from the content of your posts I have read over the years, but your username is actually pretty gender-neutral, as well.

        • @Graven, well now it makes sense why you seem to be sensitive to this gender topic since you happen to be a female, but you have utterly failed to prove any point.

          What is it that you’re trying to say, that women are equally aware of Islam and are ready to fight to the death to defeat it as men in general are or would be? Reality proves you wrong and I already made the case earlier with Feminists ignoring Islam.

          You took a course in biology but seemed to ignore biological differences between men and women which make them suited to their roles. Again women are nurturers by nature-they’re designed to have kids and to look after them.

          They have wider hips for childbearing and small shoulders. Men have wider shoulders, higher upper body strength and bigger hands/knuckles to fight battles and wars.

          After hundreds of thousands of years of human Evolution this is the key difference between the two sexes, otherwise men and women would be the same size if they were ‘equal’ when it comes to warfare.

          Some women are able to look beyond their biological programming as a female and see the world the way men do, which is why they are able to see a threat like Nazism, Fascism, Islam, barbarians at the gate, etc, but they are a small minority. The vast majority of women are more concerned with what’s right in front of them, mostly having and looking after kids.

          In the US military only 18% serving are female and the vast majority of them are support roles, since most of them are incapable of carrying the workload men do on the frontlines or think like them.

          Calling Rosella and Ardern ‘dhimmi-fools’ doesn’t answer why they are that way. You want to pretend what’s between their legs makes no difference when it is the only reason they are the way they are, cowardly, weak, subservient, traitors.

          Are there cowardly, weak beta males? Of course they are like the Pope and many leaders today-they are not men of war, nor are they fit to lead during one.

          The Pope doesn’t represent most men, but Jacinda Ardern does represent most women, a fact that is obvious and undeniable…otherwise if women were as strong as you claim, they’d be the ones fighting wars in human history.

          Rather get offended for women being rightly called out for being unfit to lead in high level jobs involving warfare, you should recognize that limitation and be in support of highly intelligent, strong men in power (like Geert Wilders for example) who will do whatever it takes to end Islam.

        • Fitna wrote:

          @Graven, well now it makes sense why you seem to be sensitive to this gender topic since you happen to be a female, but you have utterly failed to prove any point.
          ………………………….

          Well, the implication that men are not offended by sex slavery and other crimes against women (and often boys) is just calumny. Have you never noticed the articles here against these horrors?

          Here is one such story:

          “Female al-Azhar prof: Allah allows Muslims to rape non-Muslim women”

          https://jihadwatch.org/2016/01/female-al-azhar-prof-allah-allows-muslims-to-rape-non-muslim-women

          This is from Robert Spencer, who runs this site–and he is male.

          Moreover, the Muslim apologist for sex slavery in this case is female–in her case, being Muslim trumps being female–the victims are all Infidel women.

          There are many other male Anti-Jihadists who have opposed these sort of horrors.

          Then, *you yourself* spoke negatively of Muslims raping Infidel girls on this thread a couple of days ago:

          https://jihadwatch.org/2021/09/fort-bliss-afghan-muslim-evacuees-assault-female-service-member#comment-2376199

          So, clearly, my opposing sex slavery is not just because I am myself female.

          Then, I also oppose the horrors of Islam done to men–including castration of captured slaves. I am of course not incapable of caring about this because the victims are male.

          More:

          What is it that you’re trying to say, that women are equally aware of Islam and are ready to fight to the death to defeat it as men in general are or would be? Reality proves you wrong and I already made the case earlier with Feminists ignoring Islam.
          ………………………….

          I noted that most men *and* women in the West have ignored these horrors–this is not gender based. Then, there have been both men and women who have spoken out against this savagery.

          And I have no idea if the numbers are equal or not–and I doubt if you know, either. If you have results from polls or studies, please present them.

          More:

          You took a course in biology but seemed to ignore biological differences between men and women which make them suited to their roles. Again women are nurturers by nature-they’re designed to have kids and to look after them.

          They have wider hips for childbearing and small shoulders. Men have wider shoulders, higher upper body strength and bigger hands/knuckles to fight battles and wars.

          After hundreds of thousands of years of human Evolution this is the key difference between the two sexes, otherwise men and women would be the same size if they were ‘equal’ when it comes to warfare.
          ………………………….

          The idea that since women tend to be physically smaller than men that they cannot recognize the threat of Islam makes no sense at all.

          Then, not all opposition to Islam takes the form of physical fighting, either.

          Robert Spencer is not a tall man–he is in fact shorter than some women–in a story not that long ago, people jovially compared him to a hobbit. This makes no difference at all in his staunch opposition to Jihad and Shari’ah.

          More:

          Some women are able to look beyond their biological programming as a female and see the world the way men do, which is why they are able to see a threat like Nazism, Fascism, Islam, barbarians at the gate, etc, but they are a small minority. The vast majority of women are more concerned with what’s right in front of them, mostly having and looking after kids.
          ………………………….

          The idea that women opposed to the horrors of Islam are somehow actually male makes no sense. It is that humans of both genders are capable of thought and moral action.

          More:

          In the US military only 18% serving are female and the vast majority of them are support roles, since most of them are incapable of carrying the workload men do on the frontlines or think like them.
          ………………………….

          There are more women in the military all the time. In fact in the US women have only served in combat positions for the last five years.

          And again, not all opposition to Jihad takes the form of military action–or even law enforcement. First, it is ideological. Then, there are dhimmi generals in the military, as well.

          More:

          Calling Rosella and Ardern ‘dhimmi-fools’ doesn’t answer why they are that way. You want to pretend what’s between their legs makes no difference when it is the only reason they are the way they are, cowardly, weak, subservient, traitors.
          ………………………….

          It comes from “political correctness” and denial, not from gender. There are men and women who are in denial.

          Then, if you *really* believe that virtually all women are “cowardly, weak, subservient, traitors”–and are so because they have vaginas–then you must be a very lonely man, particularly if you are heterosexual.

          More:

          Are there cowardly, weak beta males? Of course they are like the Pope and many leaders today-they are not men of war, nor are they fit to lead during one.
          ………………………….

          Pope Benedict was not a military leader, either–but he understood Islam just fine. The idea that it is only military leaders who understand Islam is mistaken.

          Then–as I noted–there are also military leaders who are clueless about Islam. These stories are actually covered here quite frequently.

          More:

          The Pope doesn’t represent most men, but Jacinda Ardern does represent most women, a fact that is obvious and undeniable…otherwise if women were as strong as you claim, they’d be the ones fighting wars in human history.
          ………………………….

          This “reasoning” makes no sense. Up until fairly recently combat was based almost entirely on physical strength. That doesn’t mean that women were rooting for the enemy to win as you appear to believe.

          My mother and aunt served in the British army during WWII–yes, in non-combat positions, but both with physical danger. My mother went through the London Blitz, surviving a direct bomb hit on the building she was working in. My aunt drove huge supply trucks under dangerous blackout conditions. Both enlisted. The idea that they were actually cheering on the Nazis because of their biology is grotesquely false.

          More:

          Rather get offended for women being rightly called out for being unfit to lead in high level jobs involving warfare, you should recognize that limitation and be in support of highly intelligent, strong men in power (like Geert Wilders for example) who will do whatever it takes to end Islam.
          ………………………….

          This is ludicrous–I include Geert Wilders in my “Heroes Against Jihad” series. The idea that I don’t admire him is absurd.

          Then, Geert Wilders is not physically fighting Islam, either. He is a political leader.

          Then, he often allied with Ayaan Hirsi Ali–a female political leader in the Netherlands who has also opposed the horrors of Islam.

          There is also Jayda Franzen–whom you decided to ignore because it doesn’t fit your narrative–and others like Marine Le Pen.

          I welcome *all* patriotic Anti-Jihad leaders–I don’t really care about their gender, because it is ultimately irrellevant.

    • Rossela Pagliuchi-Lor is a moron–as everyone here knows.

      But OTTER is being disingenuous here. He says that he doesn’t condone leftist men submitting to Islam, but he doesn’t say they are lethal to the West as are white women.

      Note his saying that no one should say anything about OTTER himself–but his shtick here is that men have to control white women, and that this involves denying them the right to get an education, vote, and work outside the home.

      Further, he has said that white women have to be forced to breed–in other words, that they have to be raped. But he discovered that Anti-Jihadists do not actually want to embrace the sort of horrors of Shariah. If they wanted that, they would just convert to Islam.

      Then, his constant false claims that women specifically are unable to recognize threats is ludicrous. This tripe is given the lie here every day from all the Anti-Jihadist women nere–who OTTER is fine violently forcing to submit to men, including dhimmis. Sick, sick stuff.

      • Graven, if Otter is a woman-hating, male-supremacist, even if you are exaggerating and strawmanning his as you did with my post, I’ll still grant you that as I have no respect for incels and misogynists.

        I believe in equality for women but unless they are like a Margaret Thatcher, they need to stay the F away from any ruling position that can entail war because they’re more likely to be a surrender-money like Jacinda Ardern than a Xena warrior-princess.

        And you should already know this-it’s common sense.

        • No, I am not exaggerating OTTER’s comments here about white women.

          And no–it is not commonsense that Jacinda Ardern is endangering her people–*no* leader should do this, and no intelligent person should vote for them (save in the rare cases where the opposition is even worse, as was the situation with Boris Johnson and the even more appalling Jeremy Corbyn–both men, incidentally). Joe Biden and Justing Trudeau are pretty appalling, as well–neither female last time I checked…

  7. The Southern border of the U.S. is like it was in the days before there was a U.S.

    Like cheesecloth. Has anyone noticed how the “migrants” are dressed? Even those from the poor country of Haiti….all the hats and shirts and backpacks look new…so colorful in the crowds of thousands.

    And, how on God’s green earth, did they get from Haiti to Mexico with all that water in between the two countries? They should still be wet from the swim…

    And how many mozlum terrorists are among them? From the cells of hamas, hezbollah, isis, al queda, who have been in South America and pay drug cartels and human smugglers to get them to the U.S. so they can live high on the free hogs while they plan their next large terror attack…after voting more demons into office.

    satan is in full control of the world. All of the “leaders” are heeding his call to gather together for the war of the Great Day of God Almighty…Armageddon.

    • Texas should mark off a 100-mile wide strip of land the entire length of the border with Mexico and give it back to the Comanches and allow them to deal with intruders the way they did a few hundred years ago. The Comanches knew how to treat immigrants.

      • When I lived in Texas and home-schooled my kids, I had to first learn Texas history because I had to teach them. Some may not realize how it was back then when the Comanches ruled the land.

        Many who came from other countries wanted nothing to do with the land that became Texas because of that Tribe. It was too dangerous and they didn’t consider it worth the trouble to try to take it.

        Wonder how many are still alive that they could be given total control as you suggest?

        • Somehistory, have you ever read “Empire of the Summer Moon.” It’s the story of how the last Comanche chief, Quanah, was the son of a white woman named Cynthia Ann Parker. I think the book is going to be made into a movie sometime soon. I hope it stays true to the book.

        • CogitoErgoSum

          I don’t believe I did. The title seems familiar, but I don’t recall reading it.
          I did read about him being the son of the white lady, and hence the name Quanah Parker. I’ll have to see if I can find the book online. I haven’t been to an actual library in a long time, but I sometimes buy books from an online store.
          My mother’s ancestry includes the Apache Tribe, but I find the history of all of them very interesting. The documentary, 500 Nations was fascinating.
          Thanks for the information on the book and movie.

        • If you are member of your local library and your local library is associated with Hoopla you can check out e-books there for free. At least that’s how it was when I joined. It may be different now. Here’s a link to the Hoopla site and you can find out the requirement for signing up. I just looked and they do still have “Empire of the Summer Moon” available to borrow. Here’s the link to Hoopla:

          https://www.hoopladigital.com/

        • I found it for a fairly good price used. Thanks again. I look forward to reading it.

        • I went looking for it before I saw your reply. I’ll have to checkout the hoopla later. Thanks for the link.

        • Okay. That’s good because I just looked again and what is at Hoopla is just a summary of the book. Looks like they no longer have the full book available.

        • Thank you. I bought a few books for my 4 year old granddaughter while I was looking and she’ll be glad I have some new ones for her.
          I saw several different sites offering the book at varying prices, so others who may be interested can find one.

  8. What dangerous fools these clowns. Yes, leave the borders open to all types of evil scum. It is a totally irresponsible attitude that clowns like this have. The horrible consequences never interfere with their cosy, cosseted, very elitist types of lives. Only the average people have to put with living cheek by jowl with the scum who are allowed into countries through open borders. I think that’s why these types of people don’t really give a stuff about the damage their policies cause. It doesn’t have any effect on their lives.

  9. UN official denounces planned UK legislation against illegal immigration, tells UK to leave borders open
    ……………

    The appalling UN has always preached this suicidal insanity. If the Uk had any sense–hardly a sure thing at this point–they should tell the UN to pound sand.

  10. The UN forced the decolonization of the best and most prosperous Empires, all the Western Empires!
    The UN and USA left ALL the Marxist Empires intact and in expansion!
    Now we are being invaded by the failures of the Marxist decolonization which has been a UN lead catastrophe.
    USA has a lot to answer for, with its decolonization and nation building, nothing but failure, USA behaved as another Marxist power (Roosevelt/ Truman). The Marxist empires were not only left intact, they were left in expansion!
    Tibet was invaded and conquered as the British Empire was being dismantled by the UN
    The UN subscribes to the WWIII policy of “one China”, that is suicide.
    The UN must go it has been a Marxist liability for the advanced world economies.

    • The Soviet Union isn’t all that intact these days, and defeating Fascism was actually a good thing. Apart from that your make some good points.

  11. Keep them out. Islamic ideology is totally imcompatible with western or indeed any civilised country and they don’t change but hold onto their backward, barbaric beliefs. they practise them in our countries and breed like vermin. If Muslims don’t like the country they are in MOVE to another MUSLIM country where they can live safely but others cannot. No-one else moves to the Islamic world because they slaughter and abuse others but muslims can live there. The movement is one-way, muslims flood into and will destroy our countries. Confine muslims to the islamic world and save our children’s freedom and future.

Discover more from

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Skip to content