While the UK government pretends to care about stopping the massive illegal Muslim migrant influx via the English Channel, it has been discovered that authorities actually recently facilitated the migrant invasion.
Less than two weeks ago, British protesters declared: “Stop the Invasion” and “enough is enough” as 400 more Muslim migrants arrived via English Channel.
The Boris Johnson government grows more desperate daily, veering from trying to hide the issue to lying to the public about its many alleged efforts to try to stop the illegal influx. And now UK authorities have been caught red-handed, actively involved in facilitating illegal migration.
It is also important to note that “at no stage did the French crew, who had been tracking the migrant boat for hours, suggest the vessel was in difficulties – and only referred to its progress being ‘slow’. Therefore, the Border Force’s incursion into French waters was not an emergency life-saving mission..”
Will the Home Office take action now and send these migrants back, given its repeated promises to stop illegal migration across the English Channel?
“Exposed: Home Office launches urgent probe into how our Border Force entered French waters to collect asylum seekers with grateful permission from a Calais patrol that was supposed to stop them – as REVEALED in captains’ radio discussion,” by Sue Reid and David Barrett,Daily Mail, June 4, 2021:
Channel migrants were secretly picked up by UK Border Force last Saturday, radio transcripts between HMC Valiant (pictured on mission to Greece in February 2020) and French patrol ship Athos reveal
Last night Miss Patel ordered an urgent investigation into the incident, and said it ‘should not have happened’.
During a revealing maritime radio conversation, a recording of which was obtained by the Mail, the officers discuss the ‘legality’ of the operation.
The UK’s 140ft cutter Valiant then heads over to the French side of the Channel and launches a fast inflatable boat to collect the dinghy migrants and take them to Dover.
The extraordinary action came in the middle of a frenzied four-day period during which more than 560 migrants reached Britain.
The previous day – Friday, May 28 – was the busiest of the year so far, with 336 migrants sailing the 21 miles to the UK from the north French coast.
The behaviour of the Valiant, a Government vessel on sea patrol to protect our borders, flies in the face of Whitehall’s repeated promises to stop the relentless flow of boat migrants.
The Home Secretary has made clear she wants the French to do far more to combat migrant vessels at sea. Currently, France will intervene only if migrants ask for help.
In May last year, Miss Patel asked her Paris counterpart to agree to more interception in French waters – and even to accept vessels that were turned around in UK waters.
However, no deal was reached and instead the UK handed France £28 million for extra beach patrols.
This year the number of arrivals expected to reach the south coast from France will far outstrip last year’s 8,400 if current rates continue.
Since the start of this year more than 4,300 have reached the UK, including 1,058 in the past seven days.
The radio conversation – which took place on open frequencies between British and French officers – started at 12.23pm British time last Saturday.
A British officer with a northern accent is heard proposing the illicit handover.
He then double-checks with his French counterparts that he has legal authorisation to carry out the manoeuvre.
‘The difficulty we have is the vessel is in your waters, and we cannot come into your waters to take the vessel,’ the British officer says.
He later asks: ‘Would you have a problem if we put our boarding boat into the water near the vessel, however, we will just escort it towards UK waters?’
Ship tracking charts show that just 23 minutes later, the Valiant moved over the international sea border into French territorial waters.
It launches a fast inflatable craft to bring the migrants back to the Valiant, and then to Dover.
At no stage did the French crew, who had been tracking the migrant boat for hours, suggest the vessel was in difficulties – and only referred to its progress being ‘slow’.
Therefore, the Border Force’s incursion into French waters was not an emergency life-saving mission.
The incident took place on a day when 144 migrants reached UK shores, Home Office figures show. It is not known how many migrants were picked up by the Valiant….
Elizabeth Lawson says
I have ONE question. What possible advantage does the UK hope to achieve by importing God knows how many impoverished, frequently violent, anti democracy, anti Christian, anti Semitic and Western haters into their country? second question. Why have the people of Europe elected suicidal idiots to lead them all to the gallows? Third question. Why have European governments and citizens stood by passively while their Christian heritage is steadily replaced by Islamic mosques and all that the ideology of Islam represents? The Christian faith, you know, the religion that underpinned all that they (used to?) cherish, churches etc., are replaced with physical reminders that they are being – not so quietly – occupied by a foreign culture and ideology. Have Britishers gone mad?
Wellington says
“Have Britishers gone mad?”
Sadly, Elizabeth, at least the British elites have gone mad, though stupidity might be a more accurate characterization—and there is no kind of stupidity quite like well educated stupidity. Another factor in this unnecessary descent is sheer timidity which is effectively a euphemism for pure cowardice.
James Lincoln says
Wellington says,
“…there is no kind of stupidity quite like well educated stupidity.”
Brilliant!
john smith says
I’ll go with that James, Wellington comes out with some brilliant sayings.
gravenimage says
+1
Brando says
Their behavior is Logical when you consider that: according to JORDAN PETERSON, the ZOOMERS ( or Generation Z),
those born between 1995-2009( ages 12 to 26 ) are:
the Most NARCISSISTIC group and due to it….the Most Emotionally FRAGILE ( a lot of suicides ).
And 70% of them are LEFTISTS.
PROPHECY BY NIETZSCHE
The greatest philosopher of the 19th century, in his masterpiece THUS SPOKE ZARATHUSTRA,
Zarathustra ( Iranian) ,after 10 years living alone meditating in a mountain, descends and
says “God is dead” and that because of it one would have to change, and preached the UBERMENSCH ( Superman).
The NAZIS took his concept and gave it a Racial Twist, as they did with the New Man concept of Marx , and both concepts became the Ubermensch=ARYAN.
HITLER AND THE SISTER OF NIETZSCHE (Elisabeth Förster-Nietzsche)
By the way,the SISTER of Nietzsche , was anti-Jewish and very pro-Nazi.
1.Hitler visited Elisabeth many times.
2. She became a member of the Nazi Party.
3.Her funeral in 1935 was ATTENDED by Adolf Hitler and other Nazi dignitaries.
THE LAST MAN
Zarathustra also said that in the West there would appear,due to circumstances, the LAST MAN.
His description is that of Leftists and most of Generation Z:
passive nihilist, tired of life, take no risks, and seek only comfort and security.
Brando says
I forgot to add that the Greatest Philosopher of the 20th century,HEIDEGGER ( atheist) was also, from 1933 till 1945,
a NAZI member. And his adherence was Sincere.
His masterpiece,which has influenced philosophy for all time ,is his “Sein und Zeit” ( Being and Time ).
THE LEADER PRINCIPLE
Fuehrer means “leader” and in several discourses in NOVEMBER 1933 Heidegger endorsed the Führerprinzip (“leader principle”),
the principle that the Führer is the embodiment of the people; that he is always right and that his word is above all written law and demands total obedience
gravenimage says
Neither Boris Johnson or Priti Patel are “zoomers”.
somehistory says
When people leave the very thing that keeps them on a common sense course, the very thing that can give them a “good feeling” because they helped others to succeed without abandoning their own needs and what is right, they must replace this “very thing” with something.
The something they have replaced their heritage of Christian goodness, charity and “do to others as you would have them do to you,” with is pretending that islam is worthy of “respect” and its adherents worthy of anything and everything they can do, anything and everything they own, including their lives and children.
So, they can say, “We don’t need the God or the Christian beliefs of our forefathers in order to be “good” people; just look how good we are to the poor mozlums. We decide what is “good” and this is it.”
Brando says
That reminds of an argument used, they say Jesus said in
MATT 7:1 / LUKE 6:37
“Do NOT judge, and you will not be judged.
Do NOT condemn, and you will not be condemned.”
And so we can’t condemn Muslims and Islam,yet it is also written that Jesus said:
JOHN 7:24:
“Do not judge by APPEARANCES, but judge with RIGHT JUDGEMENT.”
somehistory says
You know how many times someone has written that to me on these pages? I don’t know either, but it has been so many, many times.
And, as I have explained each time: I am not “judging” when I write that people will be “judged” by God and held accountable for what they do, don’t do, say, don’t say and even what they think.
Jesus was telling us not to “decide” who gets to live and who has to die for the things they did/didn’t do.
If He had meant for us not to even **think** about another person’s actions/words being good or bad, He never would have told us “Do not give what is holy to dogs, or throw your pearls before swine,” and He would never have said, “Rotten trees produce rotten fruit,” and “Wolves in sheep’s clothing,” and so many, many other Scriptures that warn us of people who are pretending to be good and actually are far from it.
We can certainly “judge” a person’s actions and words as to whether they are good or bad, evil or righteous, even though we are not in the seat of Judgment to decide what happens to anyone.
Brando says
Hello somehistory, I completely agree with you, and you are right in emphasizing the role Jesus has played in the West.
NIETZSCHE’s DEFINITION of the SUPERMAN
It is interesting because for him the Ubermensch is:
“A ROMAN CESAR with the SOUL of CHRIST”
The Superman is not supposed to be a brute.
THE RELIGION OF HUMANITY
It is,as far as I know,the Only Religion created by an ATHEIST, by COMTE ( French). He is the creator of POSITIVISM.
He had fallen in love and his love died and that inspired his atheistic religion.
THE POSITIVIST CALENDAR
It consisted of 13 months, each month named after a great man of history: one was in honor of MOSES, another in honor of ST PAUL.
I was very surprised,since he was an atheist.
The others were: Homer,Aristotle,Archimedes,
Cesar,Charlemagne,Dante,
Gutenberg,Shakespeare, Descartes,
Frederick the Great and the scientist Bichat.
THE 3 PRINCIPLES OF THE RELIGION OF HUMANITY
1.Altruism ( a word he Invented): he said it means “LIVING for OTHERS”
2.ORDER
3.PROGRESS
Their slogan was: LOVE as the PRINCIPLE, ORDER and the BASE and PROGRESS as the GOAL.
WHY DID HE INCLUDE ST PAUL IN THE CALENDAR?
Comte certainly knew the NT well so his “Live for Others” sounds similar to the NT definition of the LAW as
“Love your Neighbor as Yourself”.
And his Love as the PRINCIPLE of the Religion of Humanity seems to also come from St Pauls:
1 CORINTH 13:13:
“And now these three remain: faith, hope and love.
But the GREATEST of these is LOVE.”
somehistory says
Brando
Thank you. ?
Robert Callow says
Elizabeth, I should warn that it’s not just the UK that is being governed by idiots, traitors and cowards. Western society as a whole has never looked so deceived, so depraved, so divided and so weak as it does now.
gravenimage says
Grimly this is true, Robert.
Andrew Blackadder says
Elizabeth: I have asked the exact same question and have never received a reply, and I was born in the UK, Scotland, and thankfully I left it in 1970, never to live there again.
Wellington says
Andrew Blackadder: I wish you didn’t have to write what you did but I fully understand why you wrote what you did. All those Scots who fought for Sottish freedom, like William Wallace, Robert the Bruce, James IV and James V would be appalled at what has happened to Scotland and, by extension, to all of Britain.
Beyond sad. Utterly tragic. And so stupid and unnecessary.
For the record, I am of Polish and German descent but I grieve for Scotland, England, Wales and Ireland nonetheless. My God, we are witnessing the destruction of all four of these for completely indefensible reasons. Madness.
john smith says
It’s just heartbreaking to watch your country being destroyed like this, and what is even more heartbreaking is listening to the f-ing politicians who are doing f-all to stop it, as they have become allies of the invaders. Excuse the language, but it just makes my blood boil.
somehistory says
How about if the “f” stands for finagling?
When I read of mozlums in Florida hooking and crooking, lying and “finagling” their way along, my blood boils too.
gravenimage says
I know how you feel, John.
john smith says
Somehistory and Gravenimage,
It’s nice to know that there are others who feel the same way as I do, unfortunately most of our political elite don’t feel this way, and things wont change until they do.
gravenimage says
Sadly true. And for all this Boris Johnson was still the least worst choice.
john smith says
Yes Gravenimage, had Jeremy Corbyn won the election he’d of probably added a star and crescent moon to the union jack by now.
gravenimage says
Yes–Corbyn was actively pro-Jihad. Truly terrifying. But patriotic Britons had no good choices–just bad and worse.
Crusades Were Right says
Once upon a time it was considered TREASON to assist foreigners attempting to invade one’s country.
The fact that a state agency is involved in this doesn’t make it “OK”…
…it just makes it much more worrying!
tim gallagher says
It is suicidal behaviour to be letting these invading Muslim barbarians into the UK or any other western country. I wonder if it is that the majority of the population and the politicians are seeking a peaceful life and ignoring the problem for as long as they possibly can. One day they are going to have to get really tough with the Muslim invaders because the Muslims, when they have grown their population enough will definitely try to impose their barbaric Islamic way of life on everyone. That is all Muslims are ever about. The Hungarians and those other sensible Visegrad bloc countries are showing what needs to be done. Slam the door shut on Muslims, otherwise any country is in for a very tough time in the future. Keep Muslims out or face terrible consequences later on.
gravenimage says
UK Border Force entered French waters to pick up illegal migrants and bring them to Britain
………………
Suicidal insanity.
Check Burry says
No worries, they will set up a 4 year public enquiry behind closed doors, decide it was all legal, good for everyone, meanwhile in January 2030, there have been an average of 10 terrorist attacks today, a record we are proud of, signed The Mullah of London.
I have finally decided after reading about the taxi service expansion of services in the once english channel, that we are led, deceived, by a bunch of PLONKERS.
gravenimage says
All too likely.
Hank says
Politicians can only give you “lip service” as they have no alternatives. No established, formal routes for swift, orderly processing and repatriation/deportation of illegal migrants. Mainstream politicians have left it up in the air.
gravenimage says
Some politicians could do this–not the lot in power in Britain right now, though.
OLD GUY says
Big question that needs answering in UK, Europe and America is why are our political leaders so hell bent on allowing this muslim/islamic migration invasion to take place? Who’s profiting? Is it corporations hoping for new customers or cheaper labor? Is Saudi Arabia funding our universities and our political system? Maybe we need to investigate as to how many and which of our political leaders have off shore bank accounts receiving funds from muslim countries and individuals.
Personnel opinion something STINKS.