Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

India: Member of Parliament Nusrat Jahan deceived a country of 1.3 billion for two years

By

 

Just months after the Trinamool Congress party (TMC) formed its first government in the Indian state of West Bengal, the notorious Park Street case brought the focus of the entire nation to the state. On February 6, 2012, Suzette Jordan, a Christian woman from an Anglo-Indian family, was raped by five men in a moving car on bustling Park Street.

At that time, the TMC had not yet come out as the Muslim-pandering party it is known to be today, but the party matriarch Mamata Banerjee’s mishandling of the infamous case, including her victim-shaming, transferral of the top police officer who was working on the case, and claim that the widely-debated crime was a minor incident left many people stunned.  Four of the five perpetrators were Muslims, including the prime accused, Kader Khan. Khan was dating the newly introduced actress Nusrat Jahan, also a Muslim, and the two were in contact even when Khan was at large. Khan was detained by the West Bengal Police in 2015 in a Noida hideout. Police also learned that Jahan had booked a hotel room in Mumbai for the two.

Khan and Jahan have since broken up. By 2019, Nusrat Jahan had established herself as an influential Bengali film actress, while the TMC was recognized as the most blatant Muslim-appeasing party in the country. So when the TMC introduced this actress as the parliamentary candidate for the Bashirhat constituency, no one was surprised.

Bashirhat is a Muslim-dominant constituency. Track record, reputation, or fitness for office are not important. The Muslim identity is enough to gain votes. Nusrat Jahan won the seat effortlessly and was set to enter the temple of the world’s largest democracy, the Indian Parliament, which represents a population of 1.3 billion people. But the newly-elected parliamentarian was absent from the parliament for the oath-taking ceremony.

The reason? Nusrat Jahan was busy with her extravagant wedding in Turkey where she, surrounded by her friends and family members, she tied the knot with Hindu tycoon Nikhil Jain, and the Internet was awash with incessant updates about the high profile “marriage,” or so we thought.

Upon her return from the marriage junket, the first-time parliamentarian set foot on the floor of the Indian parliament draped in a saree, sporting vermillion in her hair-partition, mangalsutra (a gold chain with black beads), choodah (red and white bangles) and henna-painted hands (all extremely revered matrimonial emblems of the Hindu culture) and took her oath as Nusrat Jahan Ruhi Jain. The elected representative went on the Parliament’s records with her marital status as “married,” and her spouse’s name as Nikhil Jain.

This marriage was celebrated by the liberal lobby, and riding on this adulation, Jahan criticised the anti-Love Jihad laws that had been proposed by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) to stop the increasing instances in which Muslim men, masquerading as Hindus, deceived Hindu women into romantic involvements that often culminated in murders, rapes or other acts of violence. Calling the BJP “poison,” Jahan said at a 2020 press conference that she practiced “secular love” and slammed the central government for introducing a law regarding it.

With the passage of time, this “marriage” hit the rocks. There were rumours that the actress-cum-parliamentarian was seeing a different actor. Soon there surfaced news of her alleged pregnancy. Responding to this news, Nikhil Jain spell out that he had not lived with his “wife” for months. There is nothing uncommon about couples falling out of love, finding love elsewhere and moving on. India is progressive enough to acknowledge that, and there are divorce laws to liberate people from bad marriages. So would the parliamentarian divorce her “husband”?

The question was common. And then the honourable people’s representative dropped the bomb. She said she had never been married to Nikhil Jain. It was just a “live-in” arrangement. “Interfaith marriage in India requires validation under the Special Marriage Act, which never happened. As the marriage was not legal, valid and tenable, there is no question of divorce,” Nusrat Jahan clarified.

The parliamentarian, who less than a year before had spoken up for “secular love,” condemning the regulating of it by “laws,” was reaching for “interfaith marriage laws” that “validate” a “marriage.” Now had this been any random pretty actress, we wouldn’t have been concerned. The reason why this has become a high-voltage drama in India was that this was an elected parliamentarian who was making self-contradictory statements according to what suited her, and had criticized Love Jihad laws on false pretenses.

If Indians were to go by her recent claims that she was never married, then this is a parliamentarian who lied on the floor of the Indian parliament while taking the oath as a representative of the house, and who provided false information in her introduction as a Lok Sabha Member.

Nusrat Jahan attended Hindu festivals as a married woman and participated in customs observed exclusively by Hindu married women. This is a parliamentarian who insulted the majority’s religious sentiments and their holy symbols.

In interviews, she had introduced Nikhil Jain as her husband and referred to Jain’s mother as her mother-in-law. This is a parliamentarian who lied to the Indian population in broad daylight.

A tainted politician, Nusrat Jahan demonstrates why Love Jihad laws are all the more essential, not only in India but in every country where both men and women are at risk of being conned by the likes of this parliamentarian.

Comments

  1. Nusrat Jahan attended Hindu festivals as a married woman and participated in customs observed exclusively by Hindu married women

    And she earned a couple of fatwas against her, for doing unislamic things like celebrating Durga Puja and so on. In one of her interviews, she stated that she didn’t need to embrace Arabic culture in order to be properly muslim. And her celebration of that festival even happened last year, in defiance of social distancing laws

    Having lied under oath while taking her oath, she ought to be expelled from the Indian parliament and barred from running again. But that would depend on whether the speaker has the cojones to do that to her

    • Under sharia law men and women who are not married according to Islamic law or are unrelated,
      cannot be in the same room together unchaperoned. This is adultery and punishable by death, usually by stoning, ‘live in’ arrangements are not possible. Thus she is in big trouble with her religion twice over. Also I think it must be difficult for a young woman to be both and actress and a Muslim, considering the lives they lead. But being hypocrites by nature I expect they make it work!

    • If indeed her constituency is largely muslim, I look forward to her going on the hustings during the next election. I hope nothing too Islamic happens to her when she is surrounded by her kind on a Friday afternoon after local imams have given another rabble-rousing theme on adultery.

      • Yeah, there is a segment of muslims who just hate her precisely for seemingly ingratiating herself w/ Hindus. One of the imams who passed a fatwa on her demanded that she officially apostatize – a novelty coming from an imam. Everything in the story above that she did which endeared her to Hindus is something that plenty of, if not most, muslims hate her for

        On top of that, she betrayed her ‘live-in partner’ for another Hindu, not a muslim, so it’s not even like muslims will like her for whoring herself to a muslim. What’s more, that guy, another actor, joined the BJP a few months ago, so it’s not even like they’re still in that relationship, since the relations b/w the 2 political parties is toxic

        Next elections, I think both muslims and Hindus will turn on her. I wouldn’t be surprised if she doesn’t run

    • Infidel Then you should correct the article yourself. Everybody knows that so called love jihad is practice overwhelmingly against non Muslim women

      • You seem pretty unaware of the fact that Wiki’s governing board is made up solely of Leftists, which is why that ‘encyclopedia’ heavily tilts left and is totally worthless for anything political, and also about a lot of history. Not only does Wiki believe in ‘Islamism’: in that article, they even define something called ‘Moderate Islamism’, which is a ______ (anybody have an opposite for euphemism? Couldn’t find one online!) for islamic reform

  4. India: Member of Parliament Nusrat Jahan deceived a country of 1.3 billion for two years
    …………..

    Particularly elaborate Taqiyya. I wonder why the “husband” agreed to this travesty?

  5. Like most Hindus (and Christians) her husband would have had absolutely no idea at all of the devious ways of the Ummah and foolishly relied on common human decency and honesty.

  7. “Deceit deceit deceit” She is following mihammed’s example to the core.
    Deceive the husband, his relatives, the people of India, deceive everyone.
    That’s essential islam for you.

  8. “Deceit deceit deceit” She is following mohammed’s example to the core.
    Deceive the husband, his relatives, the people of India, deceive everyone.
    That’s essential islam for you.

  9. 1.3 HIndus are fools, but not fools enough. That is why they are still Hindus. Otherwise, they will be like Persians.

    • Her involvement in that Calcutta rape was well hidden by the media, otherwise she would not have been as glorified as she ultimately was

Discover more from

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Skip to content