German authorities are ever solicitous of their growing and restive Muslim population, and so they’re ready to act upon the otherwise univerally denied fact that Islam hates dogs: “Once Gabriel promised the Prophet (that he would visit him, but Gabriel did not come) and later on he said, ‘We, angels, do not enter a house which contains a picture or a dog.’” — Sahih Bukhari 4.54.50
“Abdullah (b. Umar) (Allah be pleased with them) reported: Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) ordered the killing of dogs and we would send (men) in Medina and its corners and we did not spare any dog that we did not kill, so much so that we killed the dog that accompanied the wet she-camel belonging to the people of the desert.” — Sahih Muslim 3811
“Ibn Mughaffal reported: The Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) ordered killing of the dogs, and then said: What about them, i. e. about other dogs? and then granted concession (to keep) the dog for hunting and the dog for (the security) of the herd, and said: When the dog licks the utensil, wash it seven times, and rub it with earth the eighth time.” — Sahih Muslim 551
Remember: opposing Sharia is “bigoted” and “racist.”
“Islamization barks: explosives dog has to wear paw covers during a ‘mosque raid,'” translated from “Die Islamisierung bellt: Sprengstoffhund muss bei ‘Moschee-Razzia’ Pfotenüberzieher tragen,” JournalistenWatch, November 14, 2020 (thanks to Medforth):
The whole madness of pathological hyper-consideration for the “religion of peace”, whose followers like to style themselves as victims and take special rights for themselves as a matter of course, whose refusal are promptly repackaged as “discrimination” or Islamophobia, was shown by a police operation in Mannheim yesterday over a bomb threat against the Yavuz Sultan Selim Mosque in Mannheim.
According to “Südwestrundfunk”, an anonymous threatening phone call was received in the largest mosque in Baden-Württemberg. The police were immediately notified and had the mosque evacuated and cordoned off the surrounding area. But then came the best part: The explosives dog used had to be put on “paw covers” before it could be allowed into the prayer room – so that it would not contaminate the floor.
For so much multicultural circumspection, which was apparently given at least as much importance as the thwarting of the threatened attack, there was prompt praise from the board of the responsible mosque association: The officials had reacted “extremely sensitively”; that the carpet on which the believers bow was not “dirtied” by the dog was “very culturally sensitive”. One is “touched”.
“Cultural sensitivity” even in imminent danger
Apparently the German police, increasingly sinking into preventive-anti-racist compensation complexes, were more afraid that a “haram” explosive dog might hurt the feelings and sensitivities of Muslims (again) than they were of the bomb itself. By the way, it was a false alarm; So the effort was unnecessary – but as an anecdote illustrating where the state priorities are set in the best Germany of all time, it is always good.
If, for their part, the Islamic associations operating in Germany – especially the devout Muslims with a socio-political agenda – could only muster a fraction of that cultural sensitivity for the traditions, values and customs of their German host country, instead of constantly demanding privileges and consideration for themselves (while simultaneously remaining silent on terror and religious violence in the name of Islam), a lot would have been gained… (DM)