Social media companies are becoming more authoritarian by the day. Social media platforms including Twitter, Facebook and YouTube have banned the accounts of many prominent individuals who oppose Sharia oppression and the worldwide jihad. People such as Tommy Robinson and numerous others have been deplatformed by these social media giants for speaking the truth and peacefully exposing Islam and its barbarianism. Meanwhile, jihadi preachers are allowed to incite violence and propagate the tenets of the inhumane, uncivilised and destructive Sharia law.
A popular Islamic preacher named Mufti Menk has over six million followers on Twitter. In one sermon, which you can find on YouTube, he openly propagates the idea that if someone commits adultery, “the Sharia says such a person should be stoned to death, no doubts and ifs or buts.” He also preaches violence and calls for the establishment of an Islamic caliphate. Why are Twitter, Facebook and YouTube allowing a jihadi to do these things on their platforms? When someone such as Tommy Robinson exposes these barbaric practices and incitement, these social media companies have banned him because of “Islamophobia.” What the owners of these social media platforms are really saying is that a Muslim can incite violence against unbelievers and propagate inhumane practices such as stoning, but if anyone opposes these things, he or she will be banned. We are living in very strange times; the capitulation to Islam from these companies is breathtaking.
Zakir Naik is another popular Islamic preacher who openly advocates what Mohammed stated, that the adulterer should be stoned to death. Why are these social media companies allowing real hate preachers who want to violate human rights to have a platform? Naik, like Mufti Menk, has a massive following; he has over two million followers on YouTube. Muslims and new converts are becoming radicalised by the concepts these preachers propagate, and are willing to implement them — and then turn around and deceive non-Muslims that Islam is peaceful.
What is also outrageous is how supposedly moderate Muslims are sympathising with jihadis and praising them on social media. In the image on the left, you can see a supposedly moderate Muslim supporting the Muslim who shot an Ahmadi Muslim in Pakistan by using his photo as a profile picture, praising him as a hero and adding roses to his photo. His image received 41 likes from other Muslim. The Muslim in the picture on the right is named Ahmed Naqshbandi; he is showing his support for a jihadi named Khadim Hussain Rizvi, a man who put a death fatwa on the head of the Christian woman Asia Bibi in Pakistan for blasphemy, and another death fatwa on Geert Wilders for drawing Mohammed. This allegedly moderate Muslim openly shows his support for this jihadi. It no wonder that we don’t see the peaceful Muslims protesting against these jihadis, when other Muslims are openly endorsing them and the social media companies don’t take any action.