Shamima Begum, who is a high-level threat to Britons, an enemy of the state, will be allowed to “return to the UK to fight the Home Office’s decision to revoke her British citizenship for joining the murderous Islamic State regime.” The Daily Mail asks the right question: “Who’s next? Judges are accused of ‘opening floodgates’ to MORE ISIS brides and up to 150 terrorists after Home Office LOSES bombshell High Court case to keep Shamima Begum out of UK.”
This ruling is yet another example of the normalization of jihad and Sharia. Shamima Begum said she had “no regrets” as she “faithfully” served the Islamic State. She left Britain in order to join an entity that had declared war against Britain. Tory MP Andrew Bridgen said: “Most Brits will rightly think that when you swear allegiance to another country that declares war on Britain, that you have given up all the rights and protections and privileges of your British citizenship. After today’s ruling it appears you have not.”
Jihad Watch has followed the story of Shamima Begum since the beginning, including why she was stripped of her British citizenship while her lawyer relentlessly fought for her; the dangerous nature of Islamic State brides, who are no less brutal and threatening than their male counterparts; and the children of these women, who are known as “cubs of the caliphate” and were conditioned and groomed to wage jihad against infidel individuals and nations.
She should never have been allowed back. We permit more and more of what should be intolerable, and over time the freedom of our societies is chipped away by patient Islamic supremacists and their battalion of useful idiots.
“Who’s next? Judges are accused of ‘opening floodgates’ to MORE ISIS brides and up to 150 terrorists after Home Office LOSES bombshell High Court case to keep Shamima Begum out of UK,” by Martin Robinson and Paul Thompson, MailOnline. July 16, 2020:
Up to 150 British jihadis and their brides will be celebrating today after senior judges ruled that Shamima Begum must be allowed to return to the UK to fight the Home Office’s decision to revoke her British citizenship for joining the murderous Islamic State regime.
Begum – one of three east London schoolgirls who travelled to Syria to join ISIS when she was 15 – was stripped of her UK passport after she was found, nine months pregnant, in a Syrian refugee camp in February last year.
Tory MP Andrew Bridgen was left furious by today’s ruling saying it risked a flood of jihadis returning. He told MailOnline: ‘It opens the door for all her fellow jihadi brides to return to Britain – and potentially their terrorist partners too.
‘Most Brits will rightly think that when you swear allegiance to another country that declares war on Britain, that you have given up all the rights and protections and privileges of your British citizenship. After today’s ruling it appears you have not’.
These include Tooba Gondal, a former AK-47-wielding ISIS bride who groomed others online and bragged online about her ‘real freedom’ in Syria before the caliphate collapsed.
She is also in the Al Hol camp with Begum and has begged to come back to the UK because of ‘dire conditions’ there.
British jihadi fighters believed to be alive including former bouncy castle salesman turned alleged executioner Siddhartha Dhar, 36, ‘Jihadi Jack’ Letts, ISIS grave digger Shahan Choudhury, fast food addict ‘Hungry’ Hamza Parvez and Cardiff ice cream salesman Aseel Muthana may also try to seize on Begum’s legal victory.
UK civil rights groups including Liberty helped launch Begum’s legal battle in Britain and today the Court of Appeal found she could not have an ‘effective’ appeal against the decision by the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC) in February while she is out of the country – and said letting her back into the UK ‘outweighed national security concerns’.
The three judges, led by Lord Justice Flaux, said: ‘The Court concludes that Ms Begum’s appeal to the Court of Appeal should be allowed, so that she can have leave to enter the UK in order for there to be a fair and effective appeal before SIAC’. …