My latest at PJ Media:
Fresh from the destruction of its credibility due to its involvement in the attempted deep-state coup against President Trump, the FBI was revealed Tuesday to have made yet another “mistake”: it “inadvertently” revealed the name of the official of the Saudi Embassy who is suspected of aiding two of the 9/11 jihad hijackers.
What the FBI’s game is in revealing this name (Mussaed Ahmed al-Jarrah, who is described in a news report as “a mid-level Saudi Foreign Ministry official who was assigned to the Saudi Embassy in Washington, D.C., in 1999 and 2000”) is unclear. President Trump has maintained the U.S.’s alliance of convenience with Saudi Arabia, as leverage against the Islamic Republic of Iran that his predecessor so energetically worked to empower. It could be that the deep state, in its undying hatred for the President, is trying to undermine his strategy in this by reminding the world of the undeniable Saudi involvement in the 9/11 jihad attacks.
The sham alliance with Saudi Arabia will have to be confronted sooner or later, but the deep state FBI is hardly the one to do the job. Investigative journalist Paul Sperry reported in the New York Post last September that the notorious Robert Mueller, back when he was the top dog at the FBI, “covered up evidence pointing back to the Saudi Embassy and Riyadh — and may have even misled Congress about what he knew” regarding “multiple, systemic efforts by the Saudi government to assist the hijackers in the lead-up to the 9/11 attacks.”
Mueller, noted Sperry, “threw up roadblocks in the path of his own investigators working the 9/11 case, while making it easier for Saudi suspects to escape questioning, multiple case agents told me. Then he deep-sixed what evidence his agents did manage to uncover, according to the 9/11 lawsuit against the Saudis.”
Nor is that the extent of the FBI’s perfidy.
There is much more. Read the rest here.