The Muslim Brotherhood’s plan for North America states:
“The process of settlement is a ‘Civilization-Jihadist Process’ with all the word means. The Ikhwan [Muslim Brotherhood] must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and “sabotaging” its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.”
The ultimate duty of the Muslim Brotherhood is violent jihad in order to impose Sharia. Its groups, like chameleons, adapt their practices to whatever environment in which they exist. For example, Muslim Brotherhood associates will not present the same image in America, Canada and other countries in the West that they present in Egypt, Israel (remember, Hamas calls itself the Muslim Brotherhood for Palestine), or Africa.
The Muslim Brotherhood is now showing its true colors, with planned jihad attacks in Sudan. Authorities there have been monitoring several jihad groups linked to the Muslim Brotherhood — “from Egypt, Lebanon and Palestine….They want to disrupt the revolutionary government and scare off its leaders and symbols, as well as frighten the youth groups that support the transitional government.”
Egypt, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates have designated the Brotherhood a “terrorist organization,” which it is. Unfortunately, the Muslim Brotherhood manipulates Western officials who fall for their tactics. In the West, the Brotherhood often couches its activities as “anti-racism” ventures and the like, which the Brotherhood exploits to bring about a steady erosion of the freedom of speech. Remember also that Muslim Brotherhood groups in North America were discovered to be linked to Hamas during the Holy Land Foundation trial, the largest terrorism funding trial in U.S. history. Brotherhood groups, meanwhile, hammer on the word “Islamophobia” anytime their stealth objectives and those of their fellow jihadists are pointed out. There is a reason they are not satisfied with the term “anti-Muslim bigotry,” but insist on the term “Islamophobia.” This gives the Brotherhood the cover to label virtually any resistance to jihad as “hate.”
“Planned Attacks by Muslim Brotherhood in Africa Strengthen Case for Terrorist Designation,” by Irina Tsukerman, Times of Israel, March 24, 2020:
A recent paper by Sami Moubayed exposes an underreported planned attack in Sudan, not by a Muslim Brotherhood-terrorist cell, but by the Muslim Brotherhood itself. The attacks would have taken places in February in Sudan’s Khartoum and in Cairo. Members of the cell included individuals of assorted backgrounds, such as Egyptians, and entered Sudan using fake Syrian passports, which was allegedly supplied to them by the Turkish government. Worth noting that there are two separate issues worth exploring: first is the apparent shift in strategy by the Muslim Brotherhood central organizations, which had in the past distanced itself from direct involvement in violent activity.
Up until recently, the Muslim Brotherhood touted itself as a political movement, which nevertheless, funded other organizations with a record of terrorist activity, such as Hamas, Hassm, Liwa al-Thawra, which have all been designated as terrorist organizations in the United States, Egypt, and other countries. Indeed, Muslim Brotherhood activists in Egypt touted being peaceful, and presented themselves as a more “reasonable” alternative to violent jihadists – which worked in recruiting western intelligence agencies and governments, including the Obama administration, to backing them, at least in the short term. Many members of violent jihadist groups were also members of Muslim Brotherhood or shared the loose ideology and core approaches of the movement. According to some interpretations, Muslim Brotherhood always had an underground terrorist branch, which operated as a network of loosely affiliated cells and euphemistically named organizations, as a way to avoid direct accountability.
This secret apparatus is traced back to the founding of the organization by Hassan Al-Banna, who, just as like his ideological descendants, portrayed himself as a political thinker and activist, participated in elections, ran for office, and otherwise claimed to support democracy. Indeed, Al-Banna touted a militant path from the very beginning, touting religious terminology of “jihad” and openly defining jihad to include violent activity just as much as political, legal, economic, or ideological struggle. “‘Jihad means the fighting of the unbelievers and involves all possible efforts that are necessary to dismantle the power of the enemies of Islam, including beating them, plundering their wealth, destroying their places of worship, and smashing their idols.” – he wrote in his book, “The Way of Jihad”, going as far as to defend attacks on religious institutions, something that organizations like Hamas and Hassm became known for in more recent years. Jihadists inspired by Islamist ideology, for instance, murdered 305 people in a Sufi mosque in Egypt in 2017…..