“French police are said to be reluctant to report the suspicious activity of Muslim colleagues over fears of being branded Islamophobic. Institutional failures in reporting possible extremist behaviour are in the spotlight in France after a Muslim convert working in a police support role killed four officers in Paris. Senior officers are under pressure to explain how a radicalised individual could continue to work inside the force without being identified, with unions representing rank-and-file officers demanding to know what is being done to tackle the issue of infiltration.”
Robert Spencer explains in FrontPage Magazine how this “radicalized individual,” Mickaël Harpon, was enabled:
If you utter the slightest word against Islamic jihad violence or any suspicion of any individual Muslim, you’ll be fired and publicly defamed as an “Islamophobe,” a “racist,” and a “bigot.”
It is this fear of being called “Islamophobic” that has also allowed Muslim rape gangs to continue destroying the lives of young girls in the UK. Recall Muslim MP Naz Shah’s retweet of a statement that the victims should “shut up for the good of diversity.”
The fear of being called “Islamophobic,” “racist,” “bigoted,” etc. merely for telling the truth about normative Islam is opening the door to the Islamization of the West and putting citizens at risk. Where did this fear originate? With Islamic supremacist lobbies who relentlessly beat down critics of Islam as a means to subvert of the House of War; and in the meantime, terror is cast into the hearts of disbelievers (Quran 8:60) as jihad violence continues. But those who have accepted dhimmitude are the ones who bear the real blame.
It isn’t only French police who are in neglect of duty over fears about being called “Islamophobic,” but all leaders of free nations who allow Islamic supremacists to run roughshod over citizens who tell the truth.
“French Police Afraid to Report Suspicious Colleagues Due to ‘Islamophobia’ Label,” by Chris Tomlinson, Breitbart, October 10, 2019:
French police are said to be reluctant to report the suspicious activity of Muslim colleagues over fears of being branded Islamophobic.
Institutional failures in reporting possible extremist behaviour are in the spotlight in France after a Muslim convert working in a police support role killed four officers in Paris. Senior officers are under pressure to explain how a radicalised individual could continue to work inside the force without being identified, with unions representing rank-and-file officers demanding to know what is being done to tackle the issue of infiltration.
French newspaper Le Parisien reports part of the problem stems from fear by officers that if they report Islamic radicalisation in their colleagues, they could be flagged as potential Islamophobes by their superiors.
A spokesman for a police union said in response to the issue that the government should be preparing to “fight against radicalization in the police” and that whistleblowers within the force raising suspicions about colleagues should receive legal cover to protect them.
“An investigation has been launched into a grudge the assailant may have held against his colleagues, but terrorism cannot be ruled out,” a source said following the Paris police station attack.
It has also been revealed that radicalised Islamic convert Mickaël Harpon possessed a top-secret security clearance and had full access to the police prefecture’s directorate of intelligence (DRPP).
It was also reported that he had a USB stick in his possession that contained both Islamic State propaganda and the personal details of dozens of police officers. Investigators found the USB stick in his apartment shortly after the attack took place….