“Pointing to the letter, she said using the defence of consent suggests the departments don’t understand how ‘a young person of 13 or 14 does not have the capacity to consent in a situation like that.'”
Nonsense. They understand very well. They just were paralyzed by fear of being accused of “Islamophobia” and “racism.” They were willing to sacrifice Britain’s girls, and its future, to preserve their professional reputations from attacks by the likes of Nick Lowles and Fiyaz Mughal.
If Britain were remotely a sane society today, Lowles, Mughal, and other Leftist and Islamic supremacist leaders who for years stigmatized as “racist” those who called attention to Muslim rape gang activity would be forever discredited, and all the officials responsible for ignoring Muslim rape gang would be removed from their positions and forever barred from holding another position of responsibility. But if this were done, virtually the entire political class of Britain would be removed from power. That wouldn’t be a bad thing at all, but that’s why it isn’t going to happen.
“Prosecutors told 13-year-old Telford grooming victim’s family they couldn’t prosecute because she had consented to sex,” by Cheyenne Roundtree, Mailonline, April 1, 2018 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):
Prosecutors told a Telford grooming victim’s father they couldn’t prosecute the alleged abuser because the 13-year-old had consented to have sex with the man, according to uncovered documents.
The letter was discovered after papers were handed over to the Home Office as part of the ongoing investigation into what may be Britain’s ‘worst ever’ child abuse scandal.
It was sent from the Crown Prosecution Service to a father in 2016, and stated the branch couldn’t prosecute the man because although the young girl may not have wanted to have sex, she agreed she would.
‘Also at the time this took place the suspect held a reasonable belief that she was over the age of 16.
‘In her statements to the police she was clear that although she may not have wanted sexual intercourse with the suspect, she agreed to do so.’
Last Monday, it was announced that the National Independent Inquiry into Child Exploitation would talk to grooming victims as part of its ‘Truth Project’.
It came about due to claims that cases were mishandled by authorities in the Shropshire town, with many perpetrators going unpunished, and reports that similar abuse was continuing in the area.
MP for Telford Lucy Allan has slammed local police and the Crown Prosecution Service in wake of the letter, saying the evidence she’s compiled from victims and their families shows ‘a failure to understand the nature of grooming’ on the officials’ parts.
Pointing to the letter, she said using the defence of consent suggests the departments don’t understand how ‘a young person of 13 or 14 does not have the capacity to consent in a situation like that.’…