The idea of statutory rape in U.S. law is based on the quite reasonable assumption that a child cannot reasonably consent to behavior he or she only dimly understands, if at all. Nor is a child’s ability to assess possible consequences developed enough for reasonable consent to be considered to have been given. Maybe they don’t have such laws in Italy, or maybe Judge Valeria Rey just didn’t want to appear “Islamophobic.”
“Bangladeshi migrant avoids sexual assault conviction after impregnating 10-year-old girl in Italian asylum hotel after judge rules ‘no evidence of coercion,’” Remix News, June 18, 2026:
An Italian prosecutor is considering an appeal after a court sentenced a 29-year-old Bangladeshi man to five years in prison for sexual acts with a minor rather than sexual assault, despite the fact that a 10-year-old girl became pregnant following sexual encounters at a refugee reception center.
The case stems from events that took place in September 2024 at a refugee reception facility in Collio, housed within the “Il Cacciatore” hotel. The girl, who was 10 years old at the time, became pregnant after two sexual encounters with the defendant.
In a ruling, Judge Valeria Rey concluded that while there was sufficient evidence to establish that sexual intercourse had taken place, the prosecution had failed to prove beyond doubt that the encounters involved physical violence, threats, or coercion. As a result, the court reclassified the offense from sexual assault to sexual acts with a minor.
As reported by Giornale di Brescia, the child told investigators that she had been taken by force, sexually abused, and threatened with death if she disclosed what had happened. She described two separate incidents occurring in different rooms within the reception center. Her mother testified that she noticed her daughter appeared distressed during the period in question and later learned that her unhappiness was linked to the defendant’s actions.
However, the judge wrote that the girl’s allegations of violence and threats were not supported by objective evidence. According to the ruling, material recovered from the defendant’s mobile phone did not corroborate either version of events, while surveillance footage from the center failed to capture any scenes of aggression or intimidation.
“The present proceedings feature two competing versions,” the judge wrote. “If one accepts the minor’s version, it will be a case of sexual assault; if one accepts the defendant’s version, the act must be classified as sexual acts with a minor.”
The ruling also addressed a defense argument concerning the girl’s mother. According to the judgment, the mother was presented as being open to the possibility of a future marriage between her daughter and the defendant, despite allegedly being unaware of any sexual relationship between them. The judge noted that child marriage had historically been common in the family’s country of origin and cited UNICEF data stating that around 30 percent of marriages involved minors, with 10 percent involving children under 15.
Judge Rey wrote that this cultural background made the defendant’s account “not implausible,” while stressing that it did not absolve him of criminal responsibility….
Taffy@binkmail.com says
Hmmm! The Muzzie is in Italy now and not in Bangladesh. The “not implausible” defense should have been stripped once he crossed the Italian border.
After he serves his sentence, he should be given a one way ticket back to Bangladesh with interpol notification so he can’t just reappear elsewhere in Europe.
David Lakatos says
These judges are as bad as the terrorists.
Ernie says
+1
Patriot64 says
Agreed
OLD GUY says
When did sex with a 10 year old become dependent on whether the child was Coerced. This judge is a lunatic.
Luchtpint says
Sure as hell.
This judge is actually implying that this girl must have been sex-crazed at the age of ten.
gravenimage says
Yes–and this is not the first I have seen of this kind of insanity. I’ve seen Muslims say that they have to marry children because these little tots are demanding that they become their spouses. What bollocks.
Anon says
The entire macro situation is a train wreck waiting to happen. Historically, Lebanon has changed from a majority Christian to a Muslim country and experienced civil war. Yugoslavia broke up in violence. Nigeria has widespread religious violence. The list goes on and on. Hope to see some assimilation and selectivity with immigration.
very old white guy says
With Islam being the common thread???
gravenimage says
Yep.
Patriot64 says
Hang the Rapist . Lock up the judge.
jerry glenn says
He is no migrant. He’s an invader.
gravenimage says
+1
StevenRSA says
Appropriate hotel name.
gravenimage says
Yes–“Hunter”.
40 rounds says
Sufficient evidence that intercourse took place. That judge has a brilliant legal mind!
Beans🫘 says
UK SEXUAL HEALTH CLINIC FOR GROOMED GIRLS RAN BY MUSLIMS—-Prostitution LOOP
One woman described watching a girl being stabbed, beaten, and set on fire. Another account described a child just 5 or 6 years old tied up and abused, and the report includes allegations of some victims branded with the initial M for Muhammad. It’s sickening, incomprehensible, and preventable.
Will Cain: Keir Starmer was the Director of Public Prosecutions. It has been reported that while he was there, 13,000 suspected rape gang members and pedophiles were left off with warning letters.
I guarantee the British men and people will do nothing , and will probably make excuses for Muslims taking over these sex clinics. I think they would volunteer themselves to be branded with a M or two.
somehistory says
It isn’t just because the child can’t make informed decisions, but her physical body should not be subjected to the physical actions; and in this case (and so many others) having a baby.
The rapist scum and the *judge* should hang together.
Westman says
Yes. The poor girl is likely to have a C-section delivery or worse. The UK allows abortion up to 24 weeks so maybe the girl’s mom, dumb as she sounds, wants it.
somehistory says
The poor girl has no real options. the killing of the unborn is not an answer; not the baby’s fault the mom is too young.
What a lot of people miss is the physical and emotional damage done by killing the unborn.
Females with any level of motherly instincts are forever haunted by what was done, and the physical aspects can be worse than delivery.
This poor child is between that awful rock and the hard place. And the decisions….like the rape,, and the low prison sentence, etc. will be made by others.
Westman says
If geneticists and psychologists are correct that genes determine half our behavior the baby has a 25% chance of the sperm donor’s behavior which will influence the mom for 20 years. Agree however, that abortion is not a good choice.
JD says
Are you a woman?
The pregnancy should be ended. What kind of life would this kid suffer?
somehistory says
When I studied Criminology, it was clear to me that doctors, scientists, etc. don’t have a clear answer about why some become criminals.
if one looks at alcoholism, it’s likely he will see that some are predisposed to being an alcoholic, but only if he drinks it. If he avoids it, if he refuses to give in when his friends offer it, he will avoid being an alcoholic. His siblings, his children, might become alcoholics if they do not copy his way of dealing with it.
And the opposite is true….if he gives in, his family may see the damage and abstain.
Killing the unborn never is a good option.
somehistory says
Well jd, it’s good you weren’t there pushing baby killing because this was nearly two years ago “The case stems from events that took place in September 2024 ‘ and it’s not clear what was decided.
Perhaps the baby survived, and from the article, the little girl survived to tell what happened to her.
And it doesn’t matter “If”…..murdering the unborn is one of the worst things humans have every practiced. Millions upon millions for big bucks filling the pockets of those who have no heart, no soul, no conscience, no morals, no virtues.
somehistory says
The “judge” was not “objective”….nor did he get an “objective” view. The scummy “judge” took the side of the perp.
And in a court of law, culture of another nation shouldn’t be the deciding factor. The Law and who broke it should be at the top, but his creep wanted to go easy on the muzzie,
Name says
If not approving of sex between and adult and a 10 yr old child makes me islamaphobic then I wear the name proudly
Tim gallagher says
Probably some far left judge and a political appointees. Judges like this are either complete fuckwits or total degenerates. If some 10 year old is willing to have sex any decent, civilised human being would tell her to get lost, but I guess Muslim scum would no do so. Islam, what a sewer it is. Not one good aspect to the entire rotten belief system.
Spiro says
And what are the Italians going to about this
Complain say it’s awful but take action
No just worry iabout their next handout
Maybe the Vatican can open there doors
Oh wait they just tell iothers. what to do
gravenimage says
Italy: Muslim migrant impregnates 10-year-old girl, no sexual assault charge, judge says ‘no evidence of coercion’
……………………………………………………
This is *insane*. No little child can consent to being raped. Does this mean that the rapist will be free to rape other grade school kids?
owensgate says
“No coercion”! Yeah, right, a ten year old girl was “asking for it”!
The perpetrator should have gotten a “penisectomy”!
Alkflaeda says
If what the perpetrator did was perfwctly legitimate, why is his name being withheld?
gravenimage says
“Islamophobia”? sarc/off
John T.R. Gorman says
Just 25 years removed from 9-11 and it’s like nobody remembers or cares how murderous Muslims can be.
Of course “Mohammud Islum” goes downtown every night after work to try and buy the best 10-year-old hookers he can find, because they know all about legal consent, right?
You don’t have to wonder why Europe is crawling with these brain dead, inbred Muslims because their only “opposition” comes in the form of brain dead liberal judges like this!
God help us!