A new study by the Bertelsmann Foundation has found that half of all German’s “perceive Islam as a threat…. In East Germany, this proportion is even higher at 57% than in West Germany [50%].” The report does not include information on whether sharia-supporting Muslims were included in the sample survey.
No matter how hard the Muslim Brotherhood works to subvert democracies and convince Westerners that Islam is no different from any other religion — despite its 1,400-year history of violent and stealth conquest — people are starting to wake up to the truth. People are beginning to recognize that normative Islam is supremacist and expansionary, and sanctions violent and stealth jihad, as well as the abuse of women, apostates, infidels and others. Globalist leaders, however, continue to ignore the legitimate concerns of their populations, and brand any fear of Islam (no matter how prudent) as being “Islamophobic.”
Canada also ascribes to open-door immigration under the current Liberal government, although the majority of the Canadian population does not support it. 63 percent of Canadians believe the government should prioritize limiting immigration levels, because the country might be reaching a limit in its ability to integrate them. Canada has long been an immigrant society; in the past, integration concerns were merely about some communities preferring to stick to their own cultural communities and languages. Never before have Canadians experienced any internal danger or domestic threats to its safety and freedom until the rise of Islamic influence that has warranted government designations of some Islamic groups as terrorist entities and associated with jihad terror. Other Muslim groups in Canada, as well as in the U.S., are Muslim Brotherhood entities and unindicted co-conspirators to jihad terror, linked to Hamas. Canada also introduced the Zero Tolerance For Barbaric Cultural Practices Act, which was passed, but then altered to remove the words “barbaric cultural practices.”
Dr. Yasemin El-Menouar, an Islam expert with Bertelsmann, “suspects that the negative result for Islam is influenced by the perception that Islam is more of a political ideology and less of a religion.” “Perception” does not apply here. Normative Islam is a political ideology. The Sharia is divine law in Islam, and promotes a top-down approach of governance, in which mullahs and Islamic leaders protect and defend the Sharia as an all encompassing way of life that includes politics, legal dictates, social and personal instruction.
The Bertelsmann Foundation study also found that only a third of respondents found that Islam enriches German society, while the “majority of Germans say Christianity, Judaism, Hinduism, and Buddhism serve to enrich Germany.” Visible minorities are largely found among the Hindu and Buddhist populations, proving further that “racism” has nothing to do with opposition to Islam.
“Half of Germans view ISLAM as a threat, says new study,” by Benjamin Weinthal, Jerusalem Post, July 11, 2019:
he Bertelsmann Foundation released a study on Thursday revealing that every second German feels threatened by Islam. Dr. Yasemin El-Menouar, an Islam expert with Bertelsmann, wrote “Overall, about half of the respondents perceive Islam as a threat. In East Germany, this proportion is even higher at 57% than in West Germany [50%].“
The new study surveyed 1,000 people. It was conducted by the foundation’s Religion Monitor department and the data was collected in the Spring of 2019. Only a third of those surveyed said Islam enriches German society. In contrast, a majority of Germans say Christianity, Judaism, Hinduism, and Buddhism serve to enrich Germany.
El-Menouar suspects that the negative result for Islam is influenced by the perception that Islam is more of a political ideology and less of a religion. However, the study also noted that “Only a minority of citizens show a clearly anti-Islamic view and demand, for example, to prevent the immigration of Muslims.”
According to El-Menouar, “Although our study shows a widespread skepticism of Islam, but that is not necessarily synonymous with hostility toward [Muslims]. Many people have reservations about Islam, but that does not lead to political demands or anti-democratic views.”….
CRUSADER says
Until we can get this Free Speech issue corrected,
we are all in for an influx of mayhem and hell….
Supreme Court Rejects Petition for AFDI’s Writ of Certiorari for Free Speech Case
(June 19, 2019 AFDI Ad Campaign, First Amendment Lawsuit)
https://afdi.us/supreme-court-rejects-petition-for-afdis-writ-of-certiorari-for-free-speech-case/
The Supreme Court declined to take up our free speech case against Washington Metropolitan transit. It was expected. We filed petition for writ of certiorari (A type of writ, meant for rare use, by which an appellate court decides to review a case at its discretion. A writ of certiorari orders a lower court to deliver its record in a case so that the higher court may review it. ). It was denied.
Preeminent lawyer, Robert Muise of the American Freedom Law Center explains:
“This important First Amendment case is far from over. It is likely that the Supreme Court denied review because the D.C. Circuit reversed, in part, the lower court’s ruling in WMATA’s favor on whether its rejection of AFDI’s ad was ‘reasonable’ under the First Amendment in light of recent precedent, remanding the case back to the district court for its opinion on the issue. We argued that the high court should take up the case regardless because the issue was a legal one. However, the Supreme Court typically wants to hear the views of the lower courts on an issue before deciding it. Consequently, if we don’t prevail on the ‘reasonableness’ issue in the district court, we will file another appeal to the D.C. Circuit and then petition the Supreme Court once again if necessary.”
We prevailed in part in the D.C. Circuit on whether the rejection of our free speech ad was reasonable. The case was remanded back down for that determination but then stayed because the Archdiocese case was working its way up to SCOTUS (as noted in the ad). So rather than waiting for the Archdiocese case (which is a Paul Clement case—former Solicitor General—so there is a likelihood the Court will grant it), we filed a cert petition on our and similar claims since the case was stayed. The Court denied our petition. So we have to wait for the Archdiocese case to work its way through the system until the stay in our case is lifted.
Every major city has instituted the Geller ban on free speech.
WMATA originally rejected the ads because the ad copy “advocates free speech and does not try to sell you a commercial product” in violation of WMATA’s advertising guideline prohibiting “[a]dvertisements intended to influence members of the public regarding an issue on which there are varying opinions.”
WMATA now claims that the ads also violate its guideline prohibiting “[a]dvertisements that support or oppose any religion, religious practice or belief.”
AFLC contends that both guidelines are unlawful viewpoint-based restrictions.
The district court upheld the speech restrictions, and AFLC appealed that ruling to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
The D.C. Circuit reversed, in part, the adverse ruling and remanded the case for the district court to determine whether WMATA’s rejection of the ads was “reasonable.”
In its ruling, however, the circuit court affirmed that WMATA’s advertising space was a nonpublic forum and that its speech restrictions were viewpoint neutral.
Note Hill headline. “Anti–Muslim” because I defend freedom and oppose jihad and sharia.
CRUSADER says
Supreme Court rejects anti-Muslim group’s challenge to DC Metro ads ban
By Jacqueline Thomsen, The Hill, June 3, 2019:
The Supreme Court has declined to take up the case of an anti-Muslim group that sought to run ads depicting the Prophet Muhammad on public transit in Washington, D.C.
The justices, in an unsigned order issued Monday, rejected the request from the American Freedom Defense Initiative (AFDI) to hear their case over the ads, which they asked to be displayed on the D.C. Metro system. The Southern Poverty Law Center has labeled AFDI as an anti-Muslim hate group.
AFDI has labeled SPLC a hate group.
The ad submitted by the group featured the phrase “Support Free Speech” and then an image of Muhammad, the winning picture of an art contest sponsored by the group.
The Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) quickly issued a ban on “issue-oriented” ads in 2015 after receiving the submissions, and later rejected the ads.
Sharia enforcement.
AFDI, led by anti-Muslim activist Pamela Gellar [sic], argued that the WMATA’s ad space was a public forum and was protected under the First Amendment right to free speech, and that rejecting their ads was also unconstitutional.
WMATA is facing another legal challenge over the issue-oriented ads ban from the Archdiocese of Washington, which sought to run religious-themed ads on the D.C. Metro.
The Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled last year in favor of WMATA’s ad policy, finding that the Metro system was a non-public forum.
The Supreme Court is now weighing whether it should take up that case.
The National Review’s take:
The Supreme Court has declined to hear a challenge brought against the Washington, D.C. Metropolitan Area Transit Authority’s (WMATA) ban on subway and bus “issue oriented” advertisements, which was instituted in response to a proposed ad depicting the prophet Muhammad.
The Court issued an unsigned order Monday declining to take up the American Freedom Defense Initiative’s (AFDI) request that the justices intervene to protect its free-speech rights. AFDI, led by activist Pamela Gellar, submitted an ad to WMATA in 2015 that read “Support Free Speech” above an image of the prophet Muhammad that was chosen from a group of submissions entered into their “Draw Muhammad” contest.
In response, WMATA banned all “issue oriented” ads and rejected the AFDI’s submission.
AFDI held an event associated with the “Draw Muhammad” contest in Garland, Texas in May 2015. The gathering, which organizers claimed was intended to serve as a defense of free speech, made national news after two gunmen opened fire on police outside the venue. The gunmen were the only fatalities.
WMATA is also facing another challenge to the ad policy leveled by the Archdiocese of Washington, which tried and failed to run religious ads on the Metro. The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in WMATA’s favor in that case last year and the Supreme Court is now considering whether it will take up the Archdiocese’s appeal.
In a similar case brought in 2012, a federal judge required New York and Washington, D.C. transit authorities to accept an ad that read: “In Any War Between the Civilized Man and the Savage, Support the Civilized Man. Support Israel. Defeat Jihad.” AFDI has also won similar lawsuits in New York and Philadelphia.
CRUSADER says
Washington Examiner:
Supreme Court rejects Pamela Geller’s appeal over ads depicting Prophet Muhammad on DC Metro
by Melissa Quinn | June 03, 2019 :
The Supreme Court declined to consider an appeal from anti-Islam activist Pamela Geller over advertisements depicting the Prophet Muhammad that were rejected by D.C.’s public transit.
Geller and her organization, the American Freedom Defense Initiative, argued the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority violated their free speech rights when it refused to post the ads in 2015. The cartoon featured a depiction of the Project Muhammad — which Islam forbids — holding a sword and saying, “You can’t draw me,” with the words “Support Free Speech” across the top.
The organization blocked the ads, intended for WMATA’s buses and dioramas, under new advertising guidelines passed just days after submission that barred issue-oriented displays.
Geller’s organization argued the restrictions are content- and viewpoint-based, in violation of the First Amendment’s guarantee of freedom of speech.
The group accused WMATA of adopting the advertising guidelines “to silence the viewpoint” it expressed, but lost an initial lawsuit in federal court in Washington as well as an appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. The federal appeals court said the advertising space was a nonpublic forum and rejected Geller’s claim that rejection of the ads was discrimination.
gravenimage says
Bless Pamela Geller for keeping up the fight for freedom of speech.
J D S says
a name for this picture. .. “.BUTTS IN THE AIR FACES ON THE GROUND”
CRUSADER says
ACT!
Act to help Canada put the words “barbaric cultural practices”
back into the Act…
ACT! for Canada:
http://www.ACTforCanada.ca
mortimer says
Half of Germans are Islamo-perceptive and Islamo-discerning. They use their eyes and ears to deduce the motivation of Muslims.
Islam teaches that Muslims must hate kafirs ‘for the sake of Allah’ and make war against them in order to subjugate them.
mortimer says
Most Germans know the word ‘SALAFISM’ and that is further ahead than most countries. SALAFISM is the name of the Arabian IDEOLOGY that promotes JIHADISM and a return to strict Sharia law.
Laura Ann says
Britain and the invaded countries of the E.U. have fallen to Islamic rule because the males are wacked out cowards and didn’t learn history. https://www.lewrockwell.com/2019/07/paul-craig-roberts/the-obituary-for-western-civilization-can-now-be-written/
gravenimage says
Don’t preach surrender here.
IanB says
Hey Laura Ann, how many British males do you know?
Tarring us all with the same brush is lazy and ignorant.
Tommy Robinson isn’t the only one kicking back against Islamification. Thousands of us are.
Alarmed Pig Farmer says
Only half? Apparently the Germans aren’t as smart as they’re reputed to be.
CRUSADER says
Well, please understand an aspect of German mindset and attitude:
many Germans in Germany are full of themselves
and so they literally don’t see what’s in front of them as any threat
and they are so caught up in their own lifestyles they don’t perceive else-wise
and they are so astonishingly arrogant that they believe they are more robust
— and can handle anything coming their way….
It would be painfully delusional to have Germans set the stage and run the show.
It’s like that old joke of what’s hell like:
Hell:
The police are German
The cooks are British
The engineers are Italian
The administrators are French
The lovers are Swiss
…..
CRUSADER says
Dunning–Kruger SYNDROME:
In the field of psychology, the Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias in which people mistakenly assess their cognitive ability as greater than it is. It is related to the cognitive bias of illusory superiority and comes from the inability of people to recognize their lack of ability.
nicu says
lol good joke – well for us Germans the Police are really no fun , but for real criminals they are a joke cos they may not touch them !
CRUSADER says
Germany makes good cars and good roadways.
Very pushy drivers and very complex road systems, however.
IanB says
And in CRUSADER’s bell … The fair-minded are American *
* Note: this is a stereotype as idiotic as those in CRUSADER’s list.
IanB says
“bell” – spellchecker’s version of hell …
Emilie Green says
“Half of all Germans ‘perceive Islam as a threat'”
Perceive? Just perceive? That’s how far the Germans have advanced? Islam’s a very definite threat. There’s no perceiving anything about the whole situtation.
1400 years of consistent, aggressive, murderous behavior, and half the Germans are still in the perception stage?
Yikes!
Kilauea says
NEWS FLASH ! Angela Merkel considers half of Germans a threat.
CRUSADER says
Throw her into a volcano, please !
IanB says
She’d block off its eruption.
nicu says
TV showed that , too and encouraged us to talk WITH Muslims instead of Talking about Islam – cos we are so stupid not knowing anything:((( all these killings and rapes are NO reason for that of course . Oh , yes lets get rid off MerKILL !
andra says
You must take into account that this survey was run by the left Bertelsmann-Stiftung. It is surprising that they publish a percentage of 53 at all.
Other polls however – which are not as lefty – come up with a percentage of far over 60%.
Heidi says
How right you are, Andra. That was the first thing I thought when I read this. Considering that Liz Mohn, the head of Bertelsmann, one of the best friends of Angela Merkel, it is a big surprise that they even reported 53%. Something must have gone incredibly wrong like maybe Angela and Liz were not speaking to each other.
Keys says
Good points, andra and Heidi. And this from the Federal Statistical Office (Statistisches Bundesamt) on Wikipedia:
As of 2016, about ten million of Germany’s 82 million residents did not have German citizenship, which makes up 12% of the country’s population.
Regarding the immigrant background, 22.5% of the country’s residents, or more than 18.6 million people, were of immigrant or partially immigrant descent in 2016. The largest share of people with a migrant background consists of returning ethnic Germans (Aussiedler and Spätaussiedler), followed by Turkish, European Union, and former Yugoslav citizens. Since 1987, around 3 million ethnic Germans, mostly from the former Eastern Bloc countries, have exercised their right of return and emigrated to Germany.
In 2015, 36% of children under 5 were of immigrant or partially immigrant descent.
Islam is the second largest religion in the country. In the 2011 census, 1.9% of the census population (1.52 million people) gave their religion as Islam, but this figure is deemed unreliable because a disproportionate number of adherents of this religion (and other religions, such as Judaism) are likely to have made use of their right not to answer the question. Figures from Religionswissenschaftlicher Medien- und Informationsdienst suggest a figure of 4.4 to 4.7 million (around 5.5% of the population) in 2015.[4] A study conducted by the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees found that between 2011 and 2015 the Muslim population rose by 1.2 million people, mostly due to immigration. Most of the Muslims are Sunnis and Alevites from Turkey, but there are a small number of Shi’ites, Ahmadiyyas and other denominations.
Not doubt these figures for Muslims have increased even more under mad Merkel.
Fake news and trick news.
Heidi says
@Keys, those numbers don’t even reflect those who are in country illegally without papers. The maine focus is on the Germans who relocate to another area and don’t register with the authorities within 8 days. The others are none of their concern and if they sell drugs they are provided with areas where they can sell their drugs without being disturbed by the police. This country is going to hell in a basket. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/may/09/berlin-park-criticised-for-designating-spaces-to-drug-dealers
RichardL says
Agreed. I believe nothing the Bertelsmann Stiftung publishes. Might as well believe Merkel. Gruess Gott aus den USA, andra!
gravenimage says
Thanks for the background, Andra.
CRUSADER says
“Yes We Can!”
Over 1 million Muslims came to the USA as immigrants
during the Obama Administration’s terms….
doubling the population of Muslims in America!
Germany’s slogan under MerKILL: “We Can Do This!”
But — there is no redemption in Islam….
….only a guarantee into paradise: killing others! HORRIBLE !
Listen to Robert Spencer speak about immigration issues:
(minute marker 39:00)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=22wS89hBZy8#action=share
Noel says
It is my understanding that many Germans are buying air rifles for defense, as they have no 2nd. amendment like the U.S.
Keys says
I’d prefer bow and arrows, crossbow, sword, knife, slingshot, baseball bat, poison blow darts, etc. to an air rifle, wouldn’t you ?
joanofark06 says
You hit the nail on the head, Keys! I’ve been practicing with a slingshot lately. There are a lot of tools you can use! Bows and arrow too!
Naram-Sin says
Half of all Germans “perceive Islam as a threat”
The other half are still drunk from last year’s Oktoberfest.
Tom says
The majority of Germans are fearful of Islam but do not oppose immigration of Muslims?
So Germans do not equate being Muslim to being Islamic. Yet they know that Islam is the antithesis of democracy and a political, rather than a religiously driven force. There is a definite disconnect here in this thinking.
Which group of people make up the followers of Islam? Christians, Jews, Hindu’s, Buddhist’s? No, Muslims !! Therefore if Islam is a threat, then it follows logically that those who support Islam must be considered to be part of that threat.
Is there a push within Islam to force a reformation of Islam? Not as far as we know. So therefore, it must follow that the average mainstream Muslim supports the oppressive, geo political aims and objectives of Islam.
A rational fear of Islam must also include suspicion of those who are adherents to that ideology.
Germans, Swedes, Brits, Canadians, Australians, and other countries that allow mass Muslim migration must wake up to, and clearly identify, the threat that Islam poses to their existence as a people and to their culture before it is too late.
Can the practice of Islam in the west be limited only to religion? Not in its current form.
So banning or limiting the practice of Islam in the west seems the only rational approach to take until it is clearly shown that Islam is willing to reform itself so that it is no longer a geo political force with the intent of destruction and subjugation of the west.
ntesdorf says
Half of all Germans “perceive Islam as a threat”… Well that’s a good start. When the other half comes on board the Truth will be understood by all. Islam is a major threat even to itself.
Wellington says
Glass half full or half empty. Close call.
gravenimage says
Wellington, the figure is now 57%–up from 51% in a survey done by the same firm in 2013:
“‘Different and Threatening’: Most Germans See Islam as a Threat”
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/3696/germany-islam-threat
This *is* progress–I just hope it is fast enough.
gravenimage says
Sorry–my error. The figure is only 57% in East Germany. So I guess most Germans unfortunately haven’t gotten much savvier in the past six years.
Walter Sieruk says
It might be of some interest to a few people that that a book with title of JIHAD IN THE WEST published in the year 1998 authored by Paul Eregosi ,was a man who was thinking ,a bit ahead of his time ,as in before 9/11 and then many Islamic horrors of jihad terrorism that hit London, Madrid Paris as well as other Western nations of Europe .For above mentioned book of page 411 reads “Most worrying , both Islam and the West see each other as potential enemies of tomorrow .The future is a source of concern , not of optimism.”
For now. the year is 2019 so the “future” as seen from the time- frame of year 1998 .as the heading of this site main top article “Half of all German ‘perceive Islam as a threat.’ .”
The author of that book sure had a valid point
Wellington says
Thanks for that Walter. I would also make mention of Ibn Warraq’s tome, Why I Am Not A Muslim, which was published in 1995, six years before 9/11. It is a devastating indictment of Islam and its reputed founder.
gravenimage says
Thanks, Walter–I was not familiar with this book. (One small point–his name is Paul Fregosi). He died in early 2001–before many of us, including myself, understood just what a threat Islam represents.
Angemon says
It doesn’t? Aren’t the people asking for policies limiting the migration from muslim majority countries labelled “islamophobes” and publicly shunned and persecuted? I wonder if that can be a limiting factor for making political demands…
James Lincoln says
Angemon says,
“Aren’t the people asking for policies limiting the migration from muslim majority countries labelled “islamophobes” and publicly shunned and persecuted? I wonder if that can be a limiting factor for making political demands…”
Absolutely true. And worse – look what has just happened to Tommy Robinson.
Regardless, good people absolutely must take a strong stand against Islam.
Islamaphone says
El-Manure right about many people having reservations about the Religion of Terrorism; some might even have imagined booting their butts off the street.
gravenimage says
Here’s the appalling Dr. Yasemin El-Menouar agreeing that there is nothing German about Islam, but essentially saying that Germans have to suck it up and accept this alien creed:
https://www.alaraby.co.uk/english/indepth/2019/4/4/german-islam-project-work-in-progress
Greg Harrod says
ONLY half of all Germans??? I would have thought it would be a lot more than that!
gravenimage says
Germany: Half of all Germans “perceive Islam as a threat”
…………………..
And the other half are in denial…
Angemon says
Or afraid to speak. I said so before Trump’s election: the polls predicting Trump’s defeat should not be trusted. Wearing a MAGA hat could put your physical safety in peril (courtesy of those who call themselves “anti-fascists” while acting like fully-fledged fascists) so what are the odds that a Trump supporter being asked by a complete stranger about his preferred candidate would say “Trump”?
gravenimage says
This is true, Angemon.
Francis Weber says
The other 50% are mentally deranged!
Anne says
The German government refuses to declare Hezbollah a terrorist entity.
https://www.fdd.org/analysis/2019/07/11/30-german-mosques-and-cultural-centers-tied-to-hezbollah-intel-report/
gravenimage says
Yes–that story was covered here.
FYI says
Regarding that islamic love of PUBLIC “praying”.
It seems al lah doesn’t approve of their HYPOCRISY;allah is talking about his muslims here..
“Lo!The HYPOCRITES seek to beguile allah but it is he who beguileth them.
when they stand up to worship they perform it languidly and to be SEEN BY MEN”
koran 4:142
If you “pray” in PUBLIC to “be SEEN BY MEN” then that is HYPOCRISY.
Remember that when you see muslims clogging up the streets:they obviously have never read their own koran.
{Also remember that they are “praying” to a pagan Arab god Lah the Best of Deceivers k3:5,a god who gets the religion of Moses wrong.Don’t be impressed by all that false piety.According to allah himself,they are hypocrites}
{Note matthew 6 v 1 where Jesus says NOT to pray in public so “that people see what you do ” thus behaving in a hypocritical manner.It seems allah and Jesus agree on something}
So beguileth not allah o ye muslims lest allah crappeth upon you…
somehistory says
And the other half…are moslims or will soon be. Any person with a working brain…that leaves out the moslims, of course as their brains are given to the fake ‘god’ and its fake ‘prophet’….knows that islam poses danger. And moslims know that they are dangerous to other humans.
Anyone who has heard of the terror attacks, seen the influx of interlopers over the past few years…esp since 2011…has seen the increase in rapes, sexual assaults, stabbings, demands for special accommodations in housing for those same interlopers, …has to realize that islam poses dangers.
Any of the “other half” of the population that answered no danger/risk, have to be afraid or have been living in a cave, or are moslims.
Isn’t Germany the country that had PEGIDA?
Rooster says
Well thanks to Merkel and her cronies Germany will become an Islamic sharia compliant country. Unless the German people rise up and eradicate all Muslims from their borders they will cease to be Germany. The EU was a ponzy scheme to allow Muslims to invade Europe. So far it has worked! For what its worth American’s are making the same stupid mistake!
gravenimage says
This is a problem all over the West.
tim gallagher says
Like some other commenters, I can’t believe it is only 50% of Germans who have woken up,. after the Muslim sexual predator gangs in Cologne a while back and other incidents. Still, although people in Germany and in almost every other country, are proving slow to wake up, I do feel encouraged at signs that more and more people are waking up. I think the election of Salvini, a fairly tough guy, in Italy, and the conservatives winning the recent Greek election, do show that people have had a gut full of the invading Muslim “refugees”. I wish far more people had woken up. Occasionally, I have a dream, to paraphrase Martin Luther King’s speech from years ago, that all the non-Muslim people in the all the western countries will wake up to Islam and all say, hey, we’re having no Muslims in our countries. We are fed up with Islam and the evils it brings. That would give Muslims everywhere something to think about. They’d have to say, hell, everyone hates our foul religious ideology. Muslims might then ditch Islam as a dead loss and as something that is truly hated by all non-Muslims in the world, which I think should be the case. Alas, it’s only a utopian dream, but it would be a wonderful thing if it did happen. Unfortunately, too many people still can’t see what a malignant force Islam is and keep making excuses for it.
Horseman says
The other half must just be stupid.